Institute for Structural Analysis• e.g. input: 2 draw bead forces, 1 binder force result: thinning...

Preview:

Citation preview

Institute for Structural Analysis

Umformsimulation mit LS-DYNA und ETA/DYNAFORMInstitute for Structural Analysis

Beurteilung und Beeinflussung der Beurteilung und Beeinflussung der Zuverlässigkeit von Tiefziehprozessenin der frühen Entwurfsphasein der frühen Entwurfsphase

Stephan PannierWolfgang GrafMichael KaliskeMichael Kaliske

Kathrin GrossenbacherMarkus GanserMarkus GanserArnulf Lipp

Martin LiebscherMartin LiebscherHeiner Müllerschön

Introduction

Motivation

charge A too many rejects in reliablecharge Bcharge A y j

production process production processcharge B

• numerical verification afterwards

• source of trouble - delivery tolerances

Institute for Structural Analysis 2

Introduction

Definition

reliability analysis

reliability analysis

reliability analysis

design process manufacturing

t

• reliability analysis in an early design stages

modifications of design parameters easier

less expensive modifications

Institute for Structural Analysis 3

• identification of alternative design spaces

Introduction

Example

• e.g. input: 2 draw bead forces, 1 binder forceresult: thinning of blank

• simple deep drawing example – 3 input quantities, 1 results quantity

result: thinning of blank

Institute for Structural Analysis 4

Introduction

Example

• e.g. input: 2 draw bead forces, 1 binder forceresult: thinning of blank

• simple deep drawing example – 3 input quantities, 1 results quantity

result: thinning of blank

Institute for Structural Analysis 5

Introduction

Solution statement

reliability assessment

no rejects rejectsno rejects

identification of permissible design and uncertainty ranges

j

unmodifieddesign

and uncertainty ranges

design specification of alternative design spaces

• preconditionspreconditions

rare, vague information about uncertainty ranges

arbitrary structural behavior, no one-to-one functions

Institute for Structural Analysis 6

applicability of alternative design ranges in industrial environment

Institute for Structural AnalysisInstitute for Structural Analysis

Reliability analysis

Reliability analysis

Uncertainty modeling

uncertainty

aleatoric epistemic

randomness perception/evaluation

objective data subjective assessment

• abundant (objective) data• discrete random events• gambling

• limited (subjective) data• imprecise measurements• linguistic quantification

Institute for Structural Analysis 8

• experience/expert knowledge

Reliability analysis

Uncertainty modeling

objective information

f(x) µ(x)f(x) µ=01

f(x)~

µ=1

x

randomness

x

fuzziness

xfuzzy

randomnessrandomness

subjective information

Institute for Structural Analysis 9

j

Reliability analysis

Fuzzy set

1

• general definition

convexity• convexity

• -level discretization • -level optimization

Institute for Structural Analysis 10

Reliability analysis

Fuzzy structural analysis

fuzzy inputquantity

fuzzy inputquantity

mappingmapping

"-level optimization"-level optimization" level optimization" level optimization

fuzzy resultquantity

Institute for Structural Analysis 11

Institute for Structural AnalysisInstitute for Structural Analysis

Specification of lt ti d i alternative design spaces

Specification of alternative design spaces

General scheme

constraints identificationof partition

alternative design spaces

generation of point set

pac

ein

put

s

z=f(x) x=f-1(x)

cesu

lt s

pac

Institute for Structural Analysis 13

res

Specification of alternative design spaces

Dimensionality problem

• 3D • 2D

• more than sensitive 3 input quantities

Institute for Structural Analysis 14

Specification of alternative design spaces

General scheme

constraints identificationof partition

alternative design spaces

generation of point set

pac

ein

put

s

z=f(x) x=f-1(x)

cesu

lt s

pac

Institute for Structural Analysis 15

res

Specification of alternative design spaces

Partition

permissible

constraint

non-permissible

le len- le n- le

per

mis

sibl

per

mis

sibl

non

per

mis

sibl

non

per

mis

sibl

Institute for Structural Analysis 16

p pp p

Specification of alternative design spaces

Cluster analysis – objective

- pairwise disjoint

preconditions on clusters

- nonempty

- reproduce point set

Institute for Structural Analysis 17

Specification of alternative design spaces

Cluster analysis – objective

homogeneity • homogeneitypoints in a same cluster should be as similar as possible

heterogeneity

• heterogeneityg ypoints of different clusters should be as dissimilar as possible

determination of an appropriate cluster configuration ; optimization task

Institute for Structural Analysis 18

predefined number of clusters - challenge

Specification of alternative design spaces

General scheme

constraints identificationof partition

alternative design spaces

generation of point set

pac

ein

put

s

z=f(x) x=f-1(x)

cesu

lt s

pac

Institute for Structural Analysis 19

res

Specification of alternative design spaces

Alternative design space(s)

h ll h b id l convex hull vs.hypercuboid

hypercuboids per cluster vs.maximal possible hypercuboids

interacted design variables hypercuboid

bases on available

ambitiousand expensive

available point set

interaction-free detection design variables of number of

non-connected input spaces

Institute for Structural Analysis 20

Institute for Structural AnalysisInstitute for Structural Analysis

Examples

Rosenbrock function

Rosenbrock function z=f(x,y)

xy

permissibility condition

x x

yy y

Institute for Structural Analysis 22

z z

Metal forming example I

Model

crack sensitive area

computational model FLD

results

Institute for Structural Analysis 23

Metal forming example I

Reliability assessment – Fuzzy Analysis

Input parameters Delivery tolerances Fuzzy quantitiesp p

yield stress

tensile

Rp02

Rm

y

180 … 230

340 … 420

y q

<180, 205, 230>

<340, 380, 420>strength

hardeningexponent

n 0.20 … 0.30 <0.20, 0.22, 0.30>

anisotropy R90 1.80 … 4.00 <1.80, 2.40, 4.00>

1.0

Institute for Structural Analysis 24

Metal forming example I

Reliability assessment – fuzzy analysis

• evaluated results

cracking

(Grossenbacher 2008)

cracking

thinning

f lt tit• fuzzy result quantity

number of -levels: 5

rain

t

determined intervalbounds of -level: co

nstr

simulations runs: 150

Institute for Structural Analysis 25

Metal forming example I

Constraints

cross-plot: n – R90cross-plot: Rp02 – Rm

Institute for Structural Analysis 26

permissible non-permissible

Metal forming example I

Partitioning – cluster analysis

cross-plot: n – R90cross-plot: Rp02 – Rm

Institute for Structural Analysis 27

not assigned non-permissibleCluster Cluster

Metal forming example I

Partitioning – cluster analysis

3 cl ste 4 cl ste 5 cl ste3 cluster 4 cluster 5 cluster

Institute for Structural Analysis 28

Metal forming example I

Alternative design space

cross-plot: n – R90cross-plot: Rp02 – Rm

Institute for Structural Analysis 29

permissible non-permissiblealternative design space

Metal forming example II

Model

Institute for Structural Analysis 30

Metal forming example II

Input quantities

1.0

Institute for Structural Analysis 31

Metal forming example II

Reliability assessment – fuzzy analysis

• evaluated results

− geometry

− cracking (FLC)

− manufacturing

aint

• fuzzy result quantity

b f l l 2

cons

tra number of -levels: 2

determined intervalbounds of -level: bounds of level:

simulations runs: 232

Institute for Structural Analysis 32

Metal forming example II

Demonstrator

Determination of Determination of alternative design spaces

Institute for Structural Analysis 33

Conclusions

Conclusions

• assessment of reliability in an early design stages reasonable

• determination of alternative design spacesinstead of an optimal design

• detection of non-connected point sets with cluster analysis

li bilit i d li d

• assignment of hypercuboids to clusters − only permissible points

• applicability is underlined by means of an industry-relevant example

Institute for Structural Analysis 34

Institute for Structural Analysis

Umformsimulation mit LS-DYNA und ETA/DYNAFORMInstitute for Structural Analysis

Beurteilung und Beeinflussung der Beurteilung und Beeinflussung der Zuverlässigkeit von Tiefziehprozessenin der frühen Entwurfsphasein der frühen Entwurfsphase

Stephan PannierWolfgang GrafMichael KaliskeMichael Kaliske

Kathrin GrossenbacherMarkus GanserMarkus GanserArnulf Lipp

Martin LiebscherMartin LiebscherHeiner Müllerschön

Recommended