61
Arterielle Hypertonie : Welche Medikamente? Was bleibt von der renalen Denervation? Christian Ukena Klinik für Innere Medizin III Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes

Arterielle Hypertonie : Welche Medikamente? Was bleibt von ... · Arterielle Hypertonie : Welche Medikamente? Was bleibt von der renalen Denervation? Christian Ukena Klinik für Innere

  • Upload
    hadang

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Arterielle Hypertonie :Welche Medikamente?

Was bleibt von der renalen Denervation?

Christian UkenaKlinik für Innere Medizin III

Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin

Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes

40 Millionen Deutsche

haben eine arterielle

Hypertonie

Statistisches Bundesamt & Robert Koch Institut, 2008

Hypertonie in Deutschland

Hypertonie ist Todesursache Nr. 1 weltweit

Zurechenbare Mortalität in Millionen(insgesamt: 55,861,000)

0 87654321

Ezzati et al. Lancet 2002;360:1347–60

Hypertonie ist Todesursache Nr. 1 weltweit

Koronare

Mikroangiopathie

Linksventrikuläre

Hypertrophie

Koronare

Makroangio-

pathie

Vorhof-

flimmern

Diastolische

Dysfunktion

Ventrikuläre

Arrhythmien

Sym

pto

mat

ik

Herz-

insuffizienz

Thromb-

embolien

Systolische

Funktions-

einschränkung

Myokard-

infarkt

Arterielle Hypertonie

Ukena, MMW 2014

Hypertonie Klassifikation

Systolischer

Blutdruck (mmHg)

Diastolischer

Blutdruck (mmHg)

Office (Praxis) ≥140 und/oder ≥90

24-Stunden

Tag ≥135 und/oder ≥85

Nacht ≥120 und/oder ≥70

insgesamt ≥130 und/oder ≥80

Heim-Messung ≥135 und/oder ≥85

ESH Guidelines, Eur Heart J 2013

120

130

140

150

RR

(m

mH

G)

< 140/90

Alle

Patienten

< 150/90

Patienten

>80 Jahre Diabetiker

< 140/85

KHK,

Schlaganfall

139

130

Zielwerte bei Hypertonie

< 140/90

ESH Guidelines, Eur Heart J 2013

ESH Guidelines, Eur Heart J 2013

Relevante kardiovaskuläre Risikofaktoren

• Männliches Geschlecht

• Alter (Männer >55 Jahre, Frauen >65 Jahre)

• Rauchen

• Hypercholesterinämie

• Gestörte Glukosetoleranz (nüchtern, OGTT)

• Übergewicht (BMI >30 kg/m²)

• Positive Familienanamnese

• Asymptomatischer Endorganschaden:

• Linksventrikuläre Hypertrophie (EKG, Echo)

• Mikroalbuminurie

• Chronische Niereninsuffizienz (eGFR 30-60 ml/min/1,73 m²)

Hochrisikopatienten = Diabetes mellitus, KHK, MI, Nephropathie

ESH Guidelines, Eur Heart J 2013

Medikamentöse Therapie

Hypertonie Leitlinien, Deutsche Hochdruckliga 2005

Thiazid

β-Blocker

ACE-I

Ca-Antagonistandere

AT1-Antagonist

Medikamentöse Therapie

ESH Guidelines, Eur Heart J 2013

bevorzugte Kombination

mögliche Kombination

nicht empfohlen

Initiale Kombinationstherapie

Deutsche Hochdruckliga 2011

Hochrisikopatienten = Diabetes mellitus, KHK, MI, Nephropathie

Was tun wenn Medikamente alleine nicht helfen?

Diagnostik und Therapie

Unkontrollierte Hypertonie

Ausschluss der

Pseudoresistenz

Identifikation reversibler

Lebensumstände Lebensstiländerungen

Screening sekundärer Ursachen

Interventionelle

Therapien

Ggf. spezifische

Therapie

Therapieresistente Hypertonie

Nicht-pharmakologische und

optimierte pharmakologische Therapie

Flachskampf et al, Circulation 115 (2007): 3121-9

Six Month of Acupuncture Treatment

Flachskampf et al, Circ 2007; 115:3121-9

Randomized Trial of Acupuncture to Lower Blood Pressure

Circ 2013;127:2353-63

Pet ownership, particularly dog ownership, is probably associated

with decreased CVD risk (Level of Evidence: B)

Recreational walks in people adopting a dog or cat from an animal shelter

Dogs or cats?

Interventional approaches 2014

Blood pressure lowering evidence

FRENCH DENER-HTNRenal Denervation in Hypertension

Primary endpoint: Change in daytime 24-hour BP

Study

• 4-week run-in period with administration of standardized triple combination therapy (Diuretic + ACE inhibitor + CCB)

Optimal and stepped-care antihypertensive treatment + RDNversus

Optimal and stepped-care antihypertensive treatment

Changes in daytime and nighttimeambulatory BP at 6-month follow up

SBP

ch

ange

(m

mH

g)

-6.3 mmHg(95%CI -12.0 to 0.6)

p=0.03

-5.9 mmHg(95%CI -12.3 to 0.5)

p=0.03

Azizi M, ESH/ISH Athens 2014

Changes in daytime and nighttime ambulatory BP at 6-month follow up

SBP

ch

ange

(m

mH

g)

-6.3 mmHg(95%CI -12.0 to 0.6)

p=0.03

-5.9 mmHg(95%CI -12.3 to 0.5)

p=0.03

Primary efficacy endpoint was metAzizi M, ESH/ISH Athens 2014

Changes in daytime and nighttimeambulatory BP at 6-month follow up

SBP

ch

ange

(m

mH

g)

-6.3 mmHg(95%CI -12.0 to 0.6)

p=0.03

-5.9 mmHg(95%CI -12.3 to 0.5)

p=0.03

Azizi M, ESH/ISH Athens 2014

RDN Control P-value

Patients with 24-hour BP <130/80 mmHg % 40 10 P=0.02

Primary safety endpoint was met

Primary efficacy endpoint was not met

2011 2014

Mahfoud F, JACC CI 2013

Average lesion depth in pigs

Mahfoud F, EuroPCR 2014

Average lesion depth in pigs

Mahfoud F, EuroPCR 2014

Results of a human case study

• 36 y/o female• Resistant hypertension since 9 years• Ruptured dissection of the ascending aorta

Underwent bilateral RDN using Symplicity Flex 12 days beforeVink EE, NDT 2014

Renal Artery and Circumferential Peri-Arterial Nerve Location

Sakakura K, JACC 2014

Sweet spots to target?

Proximal Distal

Mahfoud F, JACC 2014Sakakura K, JACC 2014

Sweet spots to target?

Proximal Distal

Mahfoud F, JACC 2014Sakakura K, JACC 2014

Sweet spots to target?

Proximal Distal

Mahfoud F, JACC 2014Sakakura K, JACC 2014

Renal denervation reduces NEPI content and BP in animals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1 2 3 4 5

No

rep

ine

ph

irn

e (

ng

/g)

Number of ablating electrodes

Norepinephrine effect

N=20 pigs

Henegar J, Am J Hypertens 2014Mahfoud F, EuroPCR 2014

Renal denervation reduces NEPI content and BP in animals

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1 2 3 4 5

Number of ablating electrodes

N=20 pigs

Henegar J, Am J Hypertens 2014Mahfoud F, EuroPCR 2014

N=13 hounds

No

rep

ine

ph

irn

e (

ng

/g)

Norepinephrine effect

IVY

RF treatment of the Main Artery

RF treatment of each Branch

RF treatment of the Main Artery and Branches

Optimization of the Treatment Methodology

Melder B, TCT 2014

Co

ntr

ol

Main

Co

ntr

ol

Bra

nch

Co

ntr

ol

Bra

nch

+M

ain

Co

ntr

ol

Bra

nch

+M

ain

x2

0

1 0 0

2 0 0

3 0 0

4 0 0

5 0 0

T r e a tm e n t

NE

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n (

pg

/mg

)O n e -w a y A N O V A w ith T u ke y 's

* P = 0 .0 0 0 3@ P < 0 .0 0 0 1#P < 0 .0 0 0 1

&P < 0 .0 0 0 1

*

@

#&

N 1 2 1 2 1 21 2

I V Y Y 2

71%

83%

92% 91%

Branch & Main Artery Treatment Highly Effective in Reducing Renal NE

Melder B, TCT 2014

News from Symplicity HTN-3

What to learn from Symplicity HTN-3?

Antihypertensive drugs may have been maximized but may not have be stabilized

Home BP & Med Confirmation

Initial Screening

2 weeks

Confirmatory Screening R

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

What to learn from Symplicity HTN-3?

Antihypertensive drugs may have been maximized but may not have be stabilized

Home BP & Med Confirmation

Initial Screening

2 weeks

Confirmatory Screening R

Proportion of patients with medication changes

20% 40%

5%

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

Procedural aspects in Symplicity HTN-3

• 111 operators did 364 procedures• No roll-in• No clear/strict treatment recommendations

Procedural aspects in Symplicity HTN-3

• 111 operators did 364 procedures• No roll-in• No clear/strict treatment recommendations

>50% of interventionalistsperformed ≤2 RDN procedures

Bhatt DL, NEJM 2014

Procedural aspects in Symplicity HTN-3

Data presented are mean (SD)

Impact of Number of Ablations on Change in Office SBP: Matched Cohort Analysis

166 155 134 100 63 46 27 19 10N=163 152 131 98 61 45 26 18 9

*P value change in SBP for RDN compared with sham

Baseline SBP 178.2 180.1 178.6 180.3 178.2 180.5 179.0 179.4 179.1 179.7 178.3 181.3 181.9 182.3 183.2 182.8 185.4 189.4

95% CIP*

-1.7(-7.1, 3.7)0.54

-3.1 (-8.6, 2.4)0.27

-5.4 (-11.3, 0.5)0.07

-7.1 (-13.9,-0.3)0.04

-8.4 (-17.4, 0.7)0.07

-11.5 (-21.8,-1.2)0.03

-14.1 (-28.8, 0.7)0.06

-12.0 (-30.0, 5.9)0.18

-12.4 (-44.6, 19.8)0.43

Propensity scores using baseline characteristics as covariates were used to match sham control and denervation patients

P value for trend= 0.01

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

Procedural variability

Inferior Anterior Superior Posterior

4-quadrant ablation pattern

Cross-section of artery

4 quadrant ablation pattern

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

Procedural variability

Inferior Anterior Superior Posterior

4-quadrant ablation pattern

Cross-section of artery

4 quadrant ablation pattern

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

0 four quadrant ablation

1 four quadrant ablation

2 four quadrant ablation

Procedural variability

Inferior Anterior Superior Posterior

4-quadrant ablation pattern

Cross-section of artery

4 quadrant ablation pattern

0 four quadrant ablation N=253 (74%)

1 four quadrant ablation N=68 (20%)

2 four quadrant ablation N=19 (6%)

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

N=253 N=68 N=19 N=236 N=62 N=17 N=248 N=66 N=19

Systolic Blood Pressure Change at 6 Months According to Ablation Pattern

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

N=253 N=68 N=19 N=236 N=62 N=17 N=248 N=66 N=19

Systolic Blood Pressure Change at 6 Months According to Ablation Pattern

Kandzari D, EHJ 2014

What to learn from Symplicity HTN-3?

What to learn from Symplicity HTN-3?

Bhatt DL, NEJM 2014

Was bleibt von der renalen Denervation?

Multivariate Predictors of Systolic Blood Pressure Change at 6 Months

Symplicity HTN-3

RDN

Baseline Office SBP at ≥180

Total Number of Attempts

Aldosterone Antagonist

Vasodilator

Positive Predictors Negative Predictors

African American race

Alpha-1 blocker use

0.0001

0.04

0.002

0.005

P value

Kandzari D, Eur Heart J 2014

Multivariate Predictors of Systolic Blood Pressure Change at 6 Months

Symplicity HTN-3

Young hyperadrenergichypertensive patient

Obese metabolichypertensive patient

Elderly hypertensivevascular patient

Hypertensive phenotypes

Ewen S, Hypertension 2014

Young hyperadrenergichypertensive patient

Obese metabolichypertensive patient

Elderly hypertensivevascular patient

Hypertensive phenotypes

Symplicity Complexity

Thank you!

Christian Ukena

Elektrophysiologie und spez. RhythmologieKlinik für Innere Medizin III

Universitätsklinikum des SaarlandesHomburg/Saar, GermanyTel. +49 6841-16-23368Fax. +49 [email protected]