9
Clin Investig (1994) 72:526-534 C~inieN Ptlarmeee~egy Review Olinical Investigator © Springer-Verlag 1994 Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors J. Buer 1, H. Kirchner t, A. Schomburg 1, A. Schiller2, M. Manns 2, E. Lopez-H/inninen 1, S. Duensing 1, H. Poliwoda 1, J. Atzpodien 1 Abteilung H/imatologie und Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany 2 Abteilung Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany Received: 30 July 1993 / Returned: 22 November 1993 / Accepted: 18 April 1994 Abstract. Over the past 20 years the administration of cytokines has emerged as an important fourth modality for the treatment of human cancer. Ad- vances in the field of therapy of gastrointestinal tumors have become a major focus of current re- search, given the lack of progress of conventional antineoplastic therapy in most of these tumors. Among the heterogeneous group of gastrointesti- nal malignancies, novel therapeutic strategies have been employed for each individual tumor type, and cytokines (interferon-00 have gained an established role in the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumors. Although our understanding of the mechanisms of biological response modification is still limited, fur- ther improvement in the management of gas- trointestinal malignancies can be expected from multimodality therapy regimens employing cytoki- nes in combination with other biological response modifiers, chemotherapeutic agents, active-specific immunotherapy, and immunotoxin- and radionu- clide-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. A wide range of clinical and preclinical studies have been conducted in colorectal carcinoma; however, po- tential therapeutic benefit of cytokine-based bio- therapy has not been fully defined. Therefore, large- scale, i.e., multicenter, studies are required to quan- tify the potential therapeutic effects of cytokines in gastrointestinal tumors. Key words: Gastrointestinal tumors - Cytokine - Biotherapy - Interferon-~ - Interleukin-2 Over the past two decades, the use of biological agents has been introduced to the therapy of hu- man cancer. The term biological response modifi- ers is used to suggest that these agents function by Abbreviations: FA = folinic acid; 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; GI = gastrointestinal; HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; LAK cells = lymphokine- activated killer cells; TNF = tumor necrosis factor Correspondence to: J. Atzpodien altering the host response to cancer rather than by direct cytotoxicity. Recent progress in the field of biotechnology has allowed the production of high- ly purified cytokines in sufficient quantity to assess clinical usefulness. Although biological therapy is still in its infancy, there are many examples ofsuc- cesful administration of biological therapy to hu- man cancer, reviewed by DeVita and colleagues [19]. While overall progress in the conventional sys- temic therapy of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies has been slow, the promise of systemic im- munotherapy in GI tumors is substantiated by the challenging concept of activating the host's im- mune system toward a highly specific in vivo anti- tumor response. Cytokines as single agent Cytokines are a group of intercellular messenger proteins that are key immunoregulatory com- pounds. They are involved in the pathophysiology of various human diseases. They comprise the largest group of biological response modifiers in clinical trials and include the interferons (IFN-~, IFN-[3, IFN-y), interleukins (ILl-ILl3), and hema- topoietic growth factors [19]. The most frequently administered recombinant cytokines in the therapy of GI tumors are INF-~, IL-2, and INF-% while the clinical experience with other biological re- sponse modifiers including tumor necrosis factor-~ (TNF-~) and IL-1 is overall limited. While human INFs and TNF have been shown to exert direct antiproliferative activity against various GI can- cers, IL-2 affects tumor proliferation solely through the induction of secondary immune functions, both humoral and cellular [19, 75, 77, 99]. Assessing clinical usefulness of these agents has been difficult since the paradigms for cytotoxic chemotherapy are generally inappropriate for cy- tokines. The optimal biological response is often not found at maximal tolerated dose. Rather, cy- tokines usually demonstrate peak activity within a

Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

  • Upload
    j-buer

  • View
    216

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

Clin Investig (1994) 72:526-534

C~inieN Ptlarmeee~egy Review Olinical

Investigator © Springer-Verlag 1994

Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors J. Buer 1, H. Kirchner t, A. Schomburg 1, A. Schiller 2, M. Manns 2, E. Lopez-H/inninen 1, S. Duensing 1, H. Poliwoda 1, J. Atzpodien 1

Abteilung H/imatologie und Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany 2 Abteilung Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany

Received: 30 July 1993 / Returned: 22 November 1993 / Accepted: 18 April 1994

Abstract. Over the past 20 years the administration of cytokines has emerged as an important fourth modality for the treatment of human cancer. Ad- vances in the field of therapy of gastrointestinal tumors have become a major focus of current re- search, given the lack of progress of conventional antineoplastic therapy in most of these tumors. Among the heterogeneous group of gastrointesti- nal malignancies, novel therapeutic strategies have been employed for each individual tumor type, and cytokines (interferon-00 have gained an established role in the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumors. Although our understanding of the mechanisms of biological response modification is still limited, fur- ther improvement in the management of gas- trointestinal malignancies can be expected from multimodality therapy regimens employing cytoki- nes in combination with other biological response modifiers, chemotherapeutic agents, active-specific immunotherapy, and immunotoxin- and radionu- clide-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. A wide range of clinical and preclinical studies have been conducted in colorectal carcinoma; however, po- tential therapeutic benefit of cytokine-based bio- therapy has not been fully defined. Therefore, large- scale, i.e., multicenter, studies are required to quan- tify the potential therapeutic effects of cytokines in gastrointestinal tumors.

Key words: Gastrointestinal tumors - Cytokine - Biotherapy - Interferon-~ - Interleukin-2

Over the past two decades, the use of biological agents has been introduced to the therapy of hu- man cancer. The term biological response modifi- ers is used to suggest that these agents function by

Abbreviations: FA = folinic acid; 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; GI = gastrointestinal; HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; LAK cells = lymphokine- activated killer cells; TNF = tumor necrosis factor Correspondence to: J. Atzpodien

altering the host response to cancer rather than by direct cytotoxicity. Recent progress in the field of biotechnology has allowed the production of high- ly purified cytokines in sufficient quantity to assess clinical usefulness. Although biological therapy is still in its infancy, there are many examples ofsuc- cesful administration of biological therapy to hu- man cancer, reviewed by DeVita and colleagues [19]. While overall progress in the conventional sys- temic therapy of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies has been slow, the promise of systemic im- munotherapy in GI tumors is substantiated by the challenging concept of activating the host's im- mune system toward a highly specific in vivo anti- tumor response.

Cytokines as single agent

Cytokines are a group of intercellular messenger proteins that are key immunoregulatory com- pounds. They are involved in the pathophysiology of various human diseases. They comprise the largest group of biological response modifiers in clinical trials and include the interferons (IFN-~, IFN-[3, IFN-y), interleukins (ILl-ILl3), and hema- topoietic growth factors [19]. The most frequently administered recombinant cytokines in the therapy of GI tumors are INF-~ , IL-2, and INF-% while the clinical experience with other biological re- sponse modifiers including tumor necrosis factor-~ (TNF-~) and IL-1 is overall limited. While human INFs and TNF have been shown to exert direct antiproliferative activity against various GI can- cers, IL-2 affects tumor proliferation solely through the induction of secondary immune functions, both humoral and cellular [19, 75, 77, 99].

Assessing clinical usefulness of these agents has been difficult since the paradigms for cytotoxic chemotherapy are generally inappropriate for cy- tokines. The optimal biological response is often not found at maximal tolerated dose. Rather, cy- tokines usually demonstrate peak activity within a

Page 2: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

527

dose range whereby both higher and lower concen- trations may result in suboptimal effect [6, 14, 81]. Thus, the optimal dose clinically is to be defined as one which produces the maximum effect, not the highest dose tolerated without unacceptable toxici- ty. Previously, single agent cytokine therapy has been investigated; however, this modality rarely produced significant antitumor activity in GI ma- lignancies other than carcinoid tumors (Tables 1- 5). Therefore the immunomodulatory and antipro- liferative effects of biological response modifiers were most widely exploited in combination thera- pies with other immunomodulating or convention- al chemotherapeutic agents, and a plethora of clin- ical studies has been reported.

Preclinical studies determining IFN-~ and 5-fluorouracii synergism

As combination chemotherapy has an established role in the management of various malignancies, the combination of conventional cytotoxic drugs with biological response modifiers is also highly reasonable considering the nonoverlapping mecha- nisms of action and toxicity spectra of these agents. The most extensive preclinical experience with cy- tokine/chemotherapy combinations has been gained with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and IFN-~, which is also the best studied and most frequently used combination in clinical practice [98]. In addi- tion to the separate antiproliferative actions of IFN-~ and 5-FU, various modes of action have been hypothesized for the potential synergy of these agents: (a) improved 5-FU efficacy through IFN-~ mediated inhibition of thymidylate syn- thetase induction [15, 25]; (b) increased formation of active 5-FU metabolites in cells exposed to IFN-

[25]; (c) reversal of IFN-~ related suppression of tumor susceptibility toward autologous natural killer cells after pretreatment with 5-FU [52, 73]; (d) altered pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, i.e., reduced clearance and increased toxicity upon addition of IFN-~ [82]; (e) protection of normal host tissue by IFN-~, allowing for a dose intensification of 5-FU [87].

Despite this body of preclinical evidence it re- mains unclear whether IFN-~ affects the therapeu- tic efficacy of 5-FU via direct immunomodulation or through biochemical pathways as in combina- tions of 5-FU with levamisole, folinic acid (FA), and N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate. Further- more, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of action is needed to clarify not only the optimal choice of the combination agent, but also the drug concentrations, ratios, durations, and sequence of

administration of different agents. The multifacto- rial effects and nonlinear dose-response curves of biological response modifiers further add to the complexity of cytokine combination therapy [76, lOOl.

Clinical trials in gastrointestinal tumors

GI tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of dif- ferent malignancies, and clinical investigations studying the effect of immunotherapy in cancers of the esophagus, the liver, and of the biliary system are sporadic. Following early results by other in- vestigators [51, 88], Kelsen et al. reported a 25% response rate in advanced esophageal cancer pa- tients treated with a combination of IFN-~2a and 5-FU [42].

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. A number of chemotherapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of HCC. However, most of these treatment protocols were associated with signifi- cant side effects and, at best, resulted in an overall survival of several months. Immunotherapy of HCC primarily involved radiolabeled antiferritin antibodies without the concomitant use of cytoki- nes [64, 92]; further immunotherapy trials in HCC included IFN-~ alone [93] or in combination with various agents such as 5-FU [65, 66], doxorubicin [50], and cyproterone acetate [40]; IL-2 in combina- tion with lymphokine-activated killer cells [46] and adriamycine [41] has also been administered to HCC patients, with limited efficacy. In addition, single-agent IFN-~ has been used effectively in the treatment of chronic liver disease induced by hep- atitis B and C viruses, both of which are thought to play an important role in the etiology of HCC [19].

A limited number of clinical trials has been con- ducted in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma (Table 1). Most investigators have employed com- binations of IFN-~ and 5-FU, with response rates ranging from 0% to 34%; other agents include IL- 2 and nonspecific irnmunostimulants, with no re- sponse reported. Recently there has been much fo- cus on monoclonal antibodies directed at highly restricted and more uniformly expressed tumor-as- sociated antigens [771. These antibodies are selected by their ability to effectively induce antibody-de- pendent cell-mediated cellular cytotoxicity, which is potentiated by IL-2 and macrophage colony- stimulating factor [58].

The majority of biotherapy studies in pancreat- ic tumors, including neuroendocrine tumors (car- cinoids, islet cell tumors, and other tumors of the amine and precusor uptake and decarboxylation

Page 3: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

528

Table 1. Selected biotherapy and biochemotherapy studies in gastric carcinoma

Reference Agents n No. of 95% CI Response responders duration

(months)

Nio et al. [59] OK-432 a 6 NR - - Takekoshi et al. [ 1 0 ] OK-432, IFN-7,5-FU, MMC, ADM, CDDP 1 1 NR Arinaga et al. [4] Lentinan u 15 NR - -

Gomez et al. [29] IFN-%a, 5-FU 32 11 19-53% 14+ Iaffaioli et al. [36] IFN-cz, 5-FU, CBDCA, EPI 19 -° - -

Lee et al. [49] I F N - ~ z b , 5-FU 13 4 9-61% 6-28 Pazdur et al. [67] IFN-~2~ , 5-FU 40 10 13-41% 13 J/iger-Arand et al. [38] IFN-~, 5-FU, FA 36 17 NR 5.5 + Modiano et al. [56] IFN-c~, 5-FU, FA, etoposide 4 1 NR NR

Merrouche et al. [54] IL-2, BCNU, auBMT 14 3 5-51% 8 85 Ubhi et al. [94] IL-2, 5-FU 4 _a _

FA, Folinic acid; CBDCA, carboplatinum; EPI, epidoxorubicin; BCNU, carmustine; auBMT, autologous bone marrow transplanta- tion; MMC, mitomycin-C; ADM, Adriamycin; CDDP, cisplatinum; NR, not reported

Picibanil, a preparation from Streptococcus pyogenes used for biological response modification b An immunopotentiating polysaccharide from extracts of mushroom Lentinus edodes c Neoadjuvant setting in locally advanced carcinomas; in 13 previously inoperable patients subsequent gastrectomy was possible a Patients after potentially curative surgery in the adjuvant setting

Table 2. Selected biotherapy and biochemotherapy studies in neuroendocrine and other pancreatic tumors

Reference Classification a Agents n No. of 95% CI Response responders duration

(months)

DiBartolomero et al. [21] Dirix et al. [22] Oberg and Erikson [61] Biesma et al. [8] Sch6ber et al. [80] Creutzfeld et al. [16] Derderian et al. [18] Knuth et al. [44] Modiano et al. [56] Sporn et al. [84] Schmiegel et al. [78] VonHoff et al. [96] Weiner et al. [103] Brown et al. [11]

Neuroendocrine Neuroendocrine Neuroendocrine Neuroendocrine Neuroendocrine Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Carcinoma Carcinoma Carcinoma Carcinoma Carcinoma Carcinoma Carcinoma

IFN-~2a 20 2 1-32% NR IFN-~2b 11 3 6-61% NR IFN-~2b 111 17 b 9-24% 34 IFN-~eb 20 2 1-32% NR IFN-e2b 26 4 4-35% NR IFN-%o 15 0 ° 0-22% - IFN-~2a, 5-FU 46 3 1-18% 5-15 IFN-~2,, 5-FU, FA 13 3 5-54% 4+ IFN-~2,, 5-FU, 7 6 NR NR IFN-%a, 5-FU, FA, cisplatin 11 5 NR 3-21 TNF-~ 15 0 0-22% IFN- 7 30 0 0-12% MoAb 17-1A 16 0 0-21% Taxol, G-CSF 20 5 0-17% NR

FA, Folinic acid; MoAb, monoclonal antibody; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; NR, not reported a Malignant carcinoid tumors and islet cell tumors are neuroendocrine tumors considered to originate from the neural crest u Oberg et al. also reported a significant decrease in hormone secretion in 47 patients c Creutzfeld et al. also reported a significant decrease in hormone secretion in 7% of patients

system), a n d p a n c r e a t i c c a r c i n o m a s (Table 2), have used I F N - ~ a lone or in c o m b i n a t i o n wi th c h e m o t h e r a p e u t i c agents , i.e., 5 - F U wi th or wi th- ou t fol inic acid. W h i l e there were s ign i f ican t re- sponses ( 0 % - 2 7 % ) in n e u r o e n d o c r i n e t u m o r s , p a n - creat ic c a r c i n o m a s a p p e a r to be overa l l r e f rac to ry to I F N - ~ . In a d d i t i o n , s ing le -agen t I F N - 7 , T N F - ~ , a n d the 1 7 - 1 A m o n o c l o n a l a n t i b o d y have b e e n ad-

m i n i s t e r e d to p a n c r e a t i c t u m o r pa t i en t s wi th no s u b s e q u e n t ob jec t ive response .

Colorec ta l cancer

C u r r e n t t h e r a p y for a d v a n c e d co lorec ta l c a r c i n o m a us ing 5 - F U , the m o s t act ive single agen t p r o d u c e s r e sponse ra tes of less t h a n 2 0 % a n d does n o t inf lu-

Page 4: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

529

Table 3. Selected I F N ~ / 5 - F U based biotherapy in colorectal carcinoma ~

Reference Agents b n No. of 95% CI Pretreated responders patients

Wadler et al. [98] IFN-¢~, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 17 13 50 93% 0 Wadler and Wiernik [97] IFN-cx, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 32 23 53-86% 0 Douillard et al. [23] IFN-cq 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 16 5 11-59% 0 Hubermann et al. [35] IFN-eq 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 33 13 23-58% 0 Jaiyesimi et al. [39] IFN-eg 5-FU (CIVI) 23 4 5-39% 0 Wadler [100] IFN-c~, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 36 15 26-59% 0 Weh et al. [101] IFN-c~, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 40 12 17-47% 0 Diaz-Rubio et al. [20] IFN-c~, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 33 8 11 42% 0 Kemeny et al. [43] IFN-~, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 38 9 11-40% 0 Pazdur et al. [68] IFN-~, 5-FU (CIVI, IV) 45 16 22-51% 0 Brunetti et al. [11] IFN-c~, 5-FU (IV) 18 4 6-48% 14% Hansmann et al. [32] IFN-~, 5-FU (2-h CIVI), FA 19 2 1-33% 100% Nobile et al, [60] IFN-c~, 5-FU (IV), FA 41 6 6-29% 63% Piedbois et al. [69] d IFN-e~, 5-FU (2-h CIVI), FA 16 8 25 75% 38% Bukowski et al. [12] IFN-¢~, 5-FU (IV), FA 55 15 16-41% 0 Cascinu et al. [13] IFN-~, 5-FU (IV), FA 45 23 36-66% NR K6hne-W6mper et al. [45] IFN-~, 5-FU (IV), FA 21 6 9-49% 0 Kreuser et al. [47] IFN-cx, 5-FU (4-h CIVI), FA 45 14 18-47% NR Labianca et al. [48] IFN-cc, 5-FU, FA 16 4 8-55% NR Preiss [70] IFN-e~, 5-FU, (24-h CIVI), FA 23 9 20-61% 0 Schmoll et al. [71] IFN-c~, 5-FU (2-h CIVI) 32 3 2-25% 0 Sobrero et al. [83] IFN-c~, 5-FU, FA 44 6 5 27% NR Punt et al. [71] IFN-e~, 5-FU (CIVI), FA 44 11 12-38% 0 Steger et al. [85] IFN-¢~, 5-FU (2-h CIVI), FA 32 9 15-49% 0 Mattioli et al. [53] IFN-c~, 5-FU, mitomycin-C 20 6 12-54% NR Hansen et al. [31] IFN-e~, 5-FU, dipyridamole 15 6 16 68% NR Zaniboni et al. [105] IFN-e~, 5-FU, FA, dipyridamole 26 11 23-63% NR Findlay et al. [26] ~ IFN-e~, 5-FU (CIVI) 118 38 25-41% 52%

FA, Folinic acid; NR, not reported a Only clinical trials comprising more than 15 patients were selected for presentation b Mode of 5-FU application: IV, intravenous bolus; CIVI, continuous intravenous infusion ° In previously untreated patients Nobile et al. observed a response rate of 34.3% a In previously untreated patients Piedbois et al. reported a response rate of 70% e IFN-¢~ was added at the time when tumor became refractory to 5-FU; in previously untreated patients Findlay et al. observed a response rate of 42%

ence patient survival. Given the high prevalence of colorectal cancer, recent clinical and preclinical re- search in immunotherapy has focused on this tu- mor. Results of immunochemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer are shown in Tables 3-5.

Following early reports by Wadler and col- leagues [98], who achieved a response rate of 76% in 17 metastatic disease patients treated with IFN- ~/5-FU as first-line combination therapy, substan- tially lower response rates in advanced colorectal cancer patients were found in multicenter confir- mation trials [43, 68]. However, overall response rates (Table 3) appeared slightly superior to those reported previously with 5-FU based chemothera- py alone; however, a significant survival benefit af- ter combined 5-FU/IFN-~ biochemotherapy has not been demonstrated. Given the wide variety of treatment schedules (e.g., intravenous bolus vs.

continuous intravenous infusion 5-FU, additional FA), patient inclusion criteria (e.g., chemotherapy pretreatment) and reported response rates, further prospective randomized trials are needed.

In addition, a plethora of divergent and rather nonspecific immunomodulators have been em- ployed in colorectal carcinoma patients (Table 4), notably IL-1[3, IFN-7, and TNF; no significant an- titumor effect has been observed.

Interleukin-2 based clinical studies

In contrast, interleukin-2 based immunotherapy and combined IL-2 biochemotherapy have been consistently studied in advanced colorectal car- cinoma patients in a large number of trials. Follow- ing early investigations employing IL-2 single- agent therapy with additional retransfusion of

Page 5: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

530

Table 4. Selected biotherapy and biochemotherapy studies in colorectal carcinoma

Reference Agents n No. of 95% CI responders

Nio et al. [59] OK-432 a 5 NR - Monden et al. [57] OK-432, fibrinogen b 20 NR - Takagi et al. [89] OK-432, TNF 66 15 13-35% Gabrilove et al. [27] IL-l[3, 5-FU NR N R - Crown et al. [17] IL-I~, 5-FU 18 NR - O'Connell et al. [62] IFN-y 31 1 0-17% Weiner et al. [102] IFN-y, MoAb 17-lA 25 0 0-14% Ajani et al. [2] IFN-y, 5-FU 29 2 1-23% Abbruzzese et al. [1] IFN-y, TNF 13 0 c 0-25% Blottiere et al. [9] IFN-y, tumor-binding MoAb mixture 15 N R - Tsugita et al. [94] Autologous LAK cells 18 0 d 0-19% Saleh et al. [77] MoAb D612 e 21 0 NR

FA, Folinic acid; MoAb, monoclonal antibody; NR, not reported a Picibanil, a preparation from Streptococcus pyogenes used for biological response modification b Intratumoral injection prior to surgery c Early trial termination due to excessive toxicity a Tsugita et al. reported one minor remission e This is the first trial of a monoclonal antibody directed to a gastrointestinal-specific tumor-associated antigen

Table 5. Selected interleukin-2 based biotherapy and biochemotherapy studies in colorectal carcinoma

Reference IL-2 a Additional n No. of 95% CI agents responders

Hayakawa et al. [33] CIAI - 9 0 0-34% Atzpodien et al. [5] SC - 4 0 ~ 6 0 % Israel et al. [37] CIVI - 13 0 0-25% Rosenberg et al. [74] IV LAK cells 26 3 2-30% West et al. [104] CIVI LAK cells 13 0 0-25% Mittelman et al. [55] IV LAK cells 8 0 0-37% Rosenberg et al. [75] IV LAK cells 30 5 6-35% Steis et al. [86] IV, IP LAK cells (IP) 12 b 5 15-72% Mittelman et al. [55] CIVI IFN-~, (IM) 7 0 0-41% Rosenberg et al. [75] IV IFN-~, (IV) 9 1 0 4 8 % Atzpodien et al. [6] SC IFN-~, (SC) 8 0 0-37% Hamblin et al. [30] CIVI 5-FU 5 2 5-85% Hayakawa et al. [33] CIAI Cyclophosphamide 9 3 7-70% Hiddemann et al. [34] CIVI 5-FU, FA 22 3 c 3-35% Arinaga et al. [3] IV Mitomycin 33 10 16-49% Atzpodien et al. [7] SC IFN-~z, 5-FU 14 4 8-58% Taleghani et al. [91] SC IFN-~, 5-FU, FA 4 2 7-93% Ziegler et al. [106] SC MoAb L6 5 1 0-52%

FA, folinic acid; MoAb, monoclonal antibody a Mode of IL-2 application: IV, intravenous bolus; CIVI, continuous intravenous infusion; IP, intraperitoneal; SC, CIAI, constant intraarterial infusion; IM, intramuscular b Patients with disease limited to the peritoneal cavity only ° Hiddemann et al. also reported five minor remissions

subcutaneous;

lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, the major- ity of recent studies employed combinations of IL- 2, IFN-~ and/or 5-FU. By combining 5-FU with IL-2, 5-FU has shown to potentiate the effect of IL-2 on LAK cell induction, with significant eleva- tion in LAK cell generation following some days after 5-FU infusion [63]. These data provide a ra-

tionale for the sequential use of 5-FU followed by IL-2 for the boost of circulating immune cells and subsequent enhancement of tumor cell lysis. Unfor- tunately, the clinical results of such an approach have been disappointing. In a series of 14 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in this manner, objective response was only observed in

Page 6: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

531

one pat ient ; toxicity remained significant, and no p ro longa t ion of survival was achieved [72].

In a clinical s tudy using a triple combina t i on of IL-2, IFN-~ , and 5 -FU in advanced colorectal can- cer pat ients an objective response rate of 28% was observed [7], which was not substant ia l ly different f rom results r epor ted with 5-FU, 5 - F U / I F N - ~ or 5 - F U / F A . Overall , the therapeut ic efficacy of IL-2 based b io the rapy in colorectal c a r c inoma pat ients has not yet been established.

Conclusions and future directions

The therapeut ic role of IF N-~ , IL-2, and other bio- logical response modifiers in single-agent and in b i o c h e m o t h e r a p y combina t i on trials of advanced G I ca rc inoma pat ients remains mos t ly exper imen- tal. Cons t i tu t ing a safe and well- tolerated treat- men t modal i ty , I F N - ~ as single agent has a defined role in the pal l ia t ion and s y m p t o m a t i c the rapy of advanced carcinoids. In mos t G I mal ignancies fur- ther clinical studies are required, given the expected potent ia l of mu l t imoda l cancer the rapy involving cytokines and growth factors, active-specific im- m u n o t h e r a p y with vaccines or ant i - idiotypic anti- bodies, as well as passive i m m u n o t h e r a p y with ra- diolabeled m o n o c l o n a l ant ibodies such as anti- TAG-72 . In summary , i m m u n o t h e r a p e u t i c man- agement of pat ients with refractory G I tumors has a proven, yet limited, efficacy and is still in its infan- cy. Despi te our lack of in-depth unders tand ing of the therapeut ic mechan i sms of mos t cytokines, therapeut ic opt ions have substant ia l ly improved , and fur ther invest igat ions of cytokines and o ther biological response modifiers in G I mal ignancies will be evalua ted t oward the following end-points : (a) extended survival of t u m o r pat ients with no cu- rat ive opt ions ; (b) quali ty of life upon and after the rapy ; and (c) p ro longa t ion of relapse-free inter- vals in the ad juvan t setting. Therefore enrol lment of pat ients into control led clinical trials using bio- logical response modifiers in G I tumors is to be encouraged.

References

1. Abbruzzese JL, Levin B, Ajani JA, Faintuch JS, et al (1990) A phase II trial of recombinant human interferon-gamma and recombinant tumor necrosis factor in patients with ad- vanced gastrointestinal malignancies: results of a trial termi- nated by excessive toxicity. J Biol Response Modif 9:522- 527

2. Ajani JA, Rios AA, Ende K, et al (1989) Phase I and II studies of the combination of recombinant human interfer- on-gamma and 5-fluouracil in patients with advanced col- orectal carcinoma. J Biol Response Modif 8:140-146

3. Arinaga S, Karimini N, Takamuka K, Nanbara S, Akiyoshi T (1992) Correlation of eosinophilia with clinical response in patients with advanced carcinoma treated with low-dose re- combinant interleukin-2 and mitomycin-C. Cancer Im- munol Immunother 35:246-250

4. Arinaga S, Karimine N, Takamuka K, Nanbara S, Akiyoshi T (1992) Enhanced induction of LAK activity after lentinan administration in patients with gastric carcinoma. Int J Im- munopharmacol 14:535-539

5. Atzpodien J, K6rfer A, Evers P, Franks CR, Knfiver-Hopf J, Lopez-Hfinninen E, Fischer M, Mohr H, Dallmann I, Hadam M, Poliwoda H, Kirchner H (1990) Low-dose subcu- taneous recombinant interleukin-2 in advanced human ma- lignancy: a phase II outpatient study. Mol Biother 2:18-26

6. Atzpodien J, K6rfer A, Franks CR, Poliwoda H, Kirchner H (1990) Home therapy with recombinant interleukin-2 and interferon-a2b in advanced human malignancies. Lancet 335:1509-1512

7. Atzpodien J, Kirchner H, K6rfer A, Menzel T, Schomburg A, Poliwoda H (1994) Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with 5-fluouracil in combination with recombinant subcutaneous human interleukin-2 and interferon-~. Oncol- ogy 51:273~75

8. Biesma B, Willemse PHB, Mulder NH, Verschueren RCJ, Kema IP, de Bruijn HWA, Postmus PE, Sleijfer DT, de Vries EGE (1992) Recombinant interferon-alpha 2b in patients with metastatic apudomas: effect on tumours and tumour markers. Br J Cancer 66:850-855

9. Blottiere HM, Douillard JY, Koporowski H, Steplewski Z (1990) Humoral and cellular responses of colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies and interferon- gamma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 32:29-37

10. Brown T, Tangen C, Fleming T, Macdonald J (1993) A phase II trial of taxol and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Proc ASCO 12:200

11. Brunetti I, Falcone A, Giannessi P, et al (1991) Double 5-flu- orouracil modulation with folinic acid and alfa-2b interferon in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients. Proc AACR 32:92

12. Bukowski RM, Inoshita G, Yalavarthi P, Murthy S, Gibson V, Budd GT, Sergi JS, Bauer MS, Prestifilippo J (1992) A phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and alpha-2a-in- terferon in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 69:889-892

13. Cascinu S, Fedeli A, Fedeli SL, Catalano G, Luzi S (1992) Double biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucov- orin and cyclic low dose interferon-alfa-2b in advanced col- orectal cancer. Ann Oncol 3:489~491

14. Chou T, Chang AE, Shu S (1988) Generation of therapeutic T lymphocytes from tumor-bearing mice by in vitro sensi- tization. J Immunol 140:2453-2461

15. Chu E, Zinn S, Allegra C (1991) Translation regulation of thymidilate synthase in response to 5-fluorouracil and gam- ma-interferon in a human colon cancer cell line. Proc AACR 32:489-491

16. Creutzfeldt W, Bartsch HH, Jacubaschke U, St6ckmann F (1991) Treatment of gastrointestinal endocrine tumors with interferon-a and octreotide. Acta Oncol 30:529-535

17. Crown J, Jakubowski A, Kemeny N, Gordon M, et al (1991) A phase I trial of recombinant interleukin-lb alone and in combination with myelosuppressive doses of 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Blood 78:1420-1427

18. Derderian P, Pazdur R, Ajani J, et al (1991) Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and recombinant interferon-alpha-2a in the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Proc AACR 10:147

Page 7: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

532

19. DeVita VT, Hellmann S, Rosenberg SA (eds) (1991) Biologic therapy of cancer. Lippincott, Philadelphia

20. Diaz-Rubio E, Jimeno J, Camps C, Aranda E, Massati B, Blanco E, Anton A, Lizon J (1992) Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with recombinant alpha-interferon and flu- orouracil. Cancer Invest 10:259-264

21. DiBartolomeo M, Zilembo N, Castellani R, Tinessa V, Bajet- ta E (1991) Interferon-alpha-2a in carcinoid and other neu- roendocrine tumors. Proc AACR 32:312

22. Dirix JY, Prove A, Fierens H, VanOosterom AT (1991) Al- pha-interferon treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumors. Proc AACR 32:312

23. Douillard JY, Leborgne J, Danielou JY, et al (1991) Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and recombinant interferon-alpha in metastatic, previously untreated colorectal cancer. Proc AS- CO 10:139

24. Elias L, Crissman HA (1988) Interferon effects on the adeno- carcinoma 38 and HL-60 cell lines. Antiproliferative re- sponses and synergistic interactions with halogenated pyrimidine antimetabolites. Cancer Res 48:4868-4873

25. Elias L, Sandoval JM (1989) Interferon effects upon fluorou- racil metabolism by HL-60 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 163:864-867

26. Findlay M, Hill A, Cunningham D, Norman A, Nicolson M, Ford H, Husband J, Evans C, Carter R (1994) Protraced venous infusion 5-fluorouracil and interferon-a in advanced and refractory colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 5:239-243

27. Gabrilove J, Jakubowski A, Crown J, et al (1991) A phase I trial of recombinant human interleukin-1 beta alone and in combination with myelosuppressive doses of 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Ann Hematol 6:99

28. Gandolfi L, Solmi L, Pizza CG, et al (1989) Intratumoral echo-guided injection of interleukin-2 and LAK cells in hep- atocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 36:352-356

29. Gomez J, Pazdur R, Ajani J, et al (1991) Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and recombinant alpha-2a-interferon in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma. Proc ASCO 10:147

30. Hamblin TJ, Inzani V, Sadullah S, et al (1989) A phase II trial of recombinant interleukin-2 and 5-tluorouracil in pa- tients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 16:163-167

31. Hansen R, Schurtz M, Vukelich M, Blake D, Anderson T (1991) A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil infusion, interferon- alpha, and dipyridamole in advanced colorectal cancer. Proc ASCO 10:154

32. Hansmann E, Grnntjens-Prinsen G, Bremer K, Linnemann G (1991) Additional modulation of 5-fluorouracil by inter- feron-alpha-2b in advanced colorectal cancer refractory to 5-FU and folinic acid. Proc AACR 32:93

33. Hayakawa K, Fukushima T, Seito D, Asakura Y, Yamanaka Y, Morita T, Sasaki M, Konn M, Ono K (1989) Continuous arterial infusion therapy of recombinant interleukin-2 and cyclophosphamide in liver metastasis. Gan To Kagaku Ry- oho 16:2842-2844

34. Hiddemann W, Ruelfs C, Ottensmeier C, Ruckle H, Musch E, Koch O, van de Loo J (1992) Interleukin-2 followed by 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in refractory colorectal cancer

- results of a phase II study. Semin Oncol 19:225-227 35. Huberman M, McLay E, Atkins M, Goldsweig H, Bonanno

D, Layton M, Tessitore J (1991) Phase II trial of 5-fluorou- racil and recombinant interferon-alpha-2a in advanced col- orectal cancer. Proc ASCO 10:153

36. Iaffaioli RV, Frasci G, Facchini G, et al (1991) Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. Proc AACR 32:77

37. Israel L, Boaziz C, Moliard M, Morere JF, Breau JL (1991)

Phase II study of interleukin-2 in 18 patients with advanced gastrointestinal tract cancers. Proc ASCO 10:139

38. J~ger-Arand E, Bernhard H, Klein O, Wfichter B, Dippold W, Meyer z Bfischenfelde KH, Knuth A (1993) Combination 5-fluorouracil (FU), folinic acid (FA) and s-interferon 2b (IFN) in advanced gastric cancer. Proc ASCO 12:192

39. Jaiyesimi I, Pazdur R, Patt YZ, et al (1991) Phase II study of recombinant inteferon-alpha-2a and continuous infusion 5- fluorouracil in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Proc ASCO 10:147

40. Kalofonos HP, Gogos H, Vasiliou V, Karatza C (1991) Inter- feron alpha and cyproterone acetate in the treatment of pri- mary hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc AACR 32:226

41. Kawata A, Uchino J, Une Y, et al (1991) Early postoperative chemoimmunotherapy with adriamycin, rlL-2 and spleen derived LAK cells for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc AACR 32:251

42. Kelsen D, Lovett D, Wong J, et al (1992) Interferon-alpha-2a and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:269-274

43. Kemeny N, Younes A, Seiter K (1992) Interferon-alpha-2a and 5-fluorouracil for the advanced colorectal cacinoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Semin Oncol 19:171- 175

44. Knuth A, Bernhard H, Klein O, Meyer z Bfischenfelde KH (1992) Combination of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and inter- feron-alpha-2a: an active regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer. Semin Oncol 19:211-214

45. K6hne-W6mper CH, Schmoll H J, Hiddemann W, et al (1992) 5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, alpha-2b-interferon in ad- vanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 1:195

46. Komatsu T, Ymauchi K, Furukawa T, Obata H (1990) Tran- scatheter arterial injection of autologous lymphokine-acti- vated killer cells into patients with liver cancers. J Clin Im- munol 10:167

47. Kreuser ED, Hilgenfeld RU, Matthias M, Hoksch B, Old- enkott B, Porzsolt F, Disel W (1992) A phase II trial of interferon-alpha-2b with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil ad- ministered by 4 hour infusion in metastatic colorectal can- cer. Semin Onco1-19:57-62

48. Labianca R, Pancera G, Tedeski L, Dallavalle G, Luporini G (1992) High dose alpha 2b-interferon and folinic acid in the modulation of 5-fluorouracil. A phase II study in advanced colorectal cancer with evidence of an unfavorable cost/bene- fit ratio. Tumori 78:32-34

49. Lee KH, Lee JS, Suh C, Lee YS, Min YI, Ahu SH, Park UH, Kim SK (1992) Combination of 5-fluorouracil and recombi- nant alpha-2b-interferon in advanced gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 15:141-145

50. Lotz JP, Grange JD, Hannoun L, et al (1991) Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with alpha-2b inter- feron and doxorubicin. Proc AACR 32:73

51. Lovett D, Kelsen D, Heelan R (1990) 5-Fluorouracil and alpha-interferon in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Proc ASCO 9:121

52. Matheson DS, Green B J, Friedman S J, Hoar DI (1988) Stud- ies on the mechanism of activation of human natural killer function by interferon. Cell Immunol 111 : 118-125

53. Mattioli R, Manocchi P, Pilone A, et al (1991) Mitomycin + 5-fluorouracil + folinic acid in association with alpha-2b-in- terferon in advanced colorectal cancer. Proc AACR 32:92

54. Merrouche Y, Negrier S, Rebattu P, et al (1991) A phase II study of interleukin-2 following high dose BCNU and au- tologous bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. Proc ASCO 10:161

55. Mittelman A, Savona S, Gafney E, et al (1989) Treatment of patients with advanced cancer using multiple long-term cul-

Page 8: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

533

tured lymphokine-activated killer cell infusions and recom- binant human interleukin-2. J Bio Response Modif 8:468- 478

56. Modiano M, Taylor C, Brooks R, Wiggins C, Power J, A1- berts D (1993) Etoposide (E), leucovorin (L), 5-fluorouracil (F), and interferon-a2a (I) (ELFI) is an active treatment for high-risk or advanced pancreatic or gastric adenocar- cinoma. Proc ASCO 12:203

57. Monden T, Morimoto H, Shimano T, et al (1992) Use of fibrinogen to enhance the antitumor effects of OK-432. A new approach to immunotherapy for colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 69: 636-642

58. Moertel CG (1978) Chemotherapy of gastrointestinal cancer. New Engl J Med 299:1049 1052

59. Nio Y, Ohgaki K, Tsuchitani T, et al (1989) Oral administra- tion of OK-432: its immunomodulatory effects on patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Nippon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi 24:1607-1615

60. Nobile MT, Sobrero A, Guglielmi A, et al (1991) Five-fluo- rouracil and leucovorin and interferon-alpha-2b in ad- vanced colorectal cancer. Proc AACR 32:89

61. Oberg K, Erikson B (1991) The role of interferons in the management of carcinoid tumours. Br J Haematol 79:74-77

62. O'Connell M J, Ritts RA, Moertel CG, Schutt AJ, Sherwin SA (1989) Recombinant interferon-gamma lacks activity against metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 63:1998-2004

63. Onodera H, Somers SS, Guillou PJ (1990) Paradoxical effects of 5-FU/folinic acid on lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cell induction in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 62:1042-1046

64. Order SE, Stillwagon GB, Klein JL (1985) Idoine-131 anti- ferritin, a new treatment modality in hepatoma: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 3:1573-1582

65. Patt Y, Noonan C, Pazdur R, et al (1991) Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and recombinant interferon-alpha in hepato- cellular carcinoma. Proc ASCO 10:144

66. Patt YZ, Yoffe B, Charnsangavej C, Pazdur R, Fischer H, Cleary K, Roh M, Smith R, Noonan CA, Levin B (1993) Low serum alpha-fetoprotein level in patients with hepato- cellular carcinoma as a predictor of response to 5-FU and interferon-alpha-2b. Cancer 72:2574-2582

67. Pazdur R, Ajani JA, Winn R, Bearden J, Belt RJ, Pilat S, Levin B (1992) A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and recom- binant interferon-alpha in previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer. Cancer 69:878-882

68. Pazdur R, Moore DF, Bready B (1992) Modulation of 5-flu- orouracil with recombinant alpha-interferon: M.D. Ander- son clinical trial. Semin Oncol 19:176-179

69. Piedbois P, Gimonet JF, Feuilhade F, et al (1991) 5-Fluorou- racil, folinic acid and alpha-2a-interferon combination in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Proc ASCO 10:141

70. Preiss J (1992) 5-fiuorouracil plus interferon-alpha2a and folinic acid in regional and systemic therapy in colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 19:220-224

71. Punt CJA, Burghouts JTM, Croles JJ, vanLiessum PA, de- Mulder PHM, Kamm Y (1993) Continous infusion of high- dose 5-fiuorouracil in combination with leucovorin and re- combinant interferon-alpha-2b in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 72:2107-2111

72. Reid I, Lundy J, Monson JRT, et al (1992) Heteroconjugated antibodies enhance lymphocyte-mediated tumour lysis in vitro and in vivo. Br J Surg 79:628-632

73. Reiter Z, Ozes ON, Blatt LM, Taylor MW (1992) A dual anti-tumor effect of a combination of interferon-~ or inter- leukin-2 and 5-fluorouracil on natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 62:103-111

74. Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Muul LM, Chang AE, Avis FP,

Leitman S, Linehan WM, Robertson CN, Lee RE, Rubin JT, Seipp CA, Simpson CG, White DE (1987) A progress report on the treatment of 157 patients with advanced cancer using lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin-2 or high- dose interleukin-2 alone. NEJM 316:889-897

75. Rosenberg SA, Lotze )/IT, Yang JC, Linehan WM, Seipp C, Calabro S, Steinberg S~ White DE (1989) Combination ther- apy with interleukin-2 and alpha-interferon for the treat- ment of patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 7:1863- 1874

76. Rustum YM (1991) Rational basis for the metabolic modu- lation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin and interferon-alpha. Br J Haematol 19:52-55

77. Saleh MN, Khazaeli MB, Grizzle WE, Wheeler RH, Lawson S, Liu T, Russel C, Meredith R, Schlom J, LoBuglio AF (1993) A phase I trial of murine monoclonal antibody D612 in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Res 53:4555-4562

78. Schmiegel WH, Bftzow GH, Lanwieler T (1988) Biological response modifier in pancreatic cancer: clinical phase one trial with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor. Diges- tion 40:114

79. Schmoll H J, K6hne-WSmper CH, Hiddemann W, Knipp H, Wilke H, Bodenstein H, Harstrick A, Hill H (1992) Interfer- on-alpha2b, 5-fiuorouracil, and folinic acid combination therapy in advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of a phase I/II trial. Semin Oncol 19:191 196

80. SchSber C, Schmoll E, Schmoll H J, Poliwoda H, Schuppert F, Stahl M, Bokemeyer C, Wilke H, Weiss J (1992) Antitu- mor effect and symptomatic control with interferon-alpha2b in patients with endocrine active tumors. Eur J Cancer 28:1664-1666

81. School DD, Gramolini BA, Davidson DL, Eberlein TJ, et al (1988) Adoptive immunotherapy of human cancer using low-dose recombinant interleukin-2 and lymphokine-acti- rated killer cells. Cancer Res 48:5007-5010

82. Schiiller J, Czejka M, Miksche M, Fogl U, Jfiger W (1991) Influence of interferon-alpha2b with or without leucovorin on pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil. Semin Oncol 2:93-97

83. Sobrero A, Nobile MT, Gulglielmi A, Mori A, Schele C, Bolli E, Tixi L, Gallo L, Parodi GE, Bruzzi P (1992) Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid and interferon-al- pha2b in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 28:850 852

84. Sporn JR, Buzaid A, Slater D, Greenberg BR (1993) Treat- ment of advanced pancreatic cancer with cisplatin, 5-FU, Leucovorin, and interferon a-2b. Proc ASCO 12:207

85. Steger GG, Mader RM, Djavanmard MP, Gnant MFX, Locker G, Marosi C, Rainer H, Jakesz R (1994) Double modulation of 5-fluorouracil by high-dose leucovorin and interferon a2b in advanced colorectal caner: a phase I and a phase II study of weekly administration. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 120:314-318

86. Steis RG, Urba W J, VanderMolen LA, et al (1990) Intraperi- toneal lymphokine-activated killer cell and interleukin-2 therapy for malignancies limited to the peritoneal cavity. J Clin Oncol 8:1618-1629

87. Stolfi RL, Martin DS (1985) Modulation of chemotherapeu- tic drug activity with polyribonucleotides or with interferon. J Biol Response Modif 4:634-639

88. Strack M, Wadler S, Lyver A (1990) Phase II trial of fluorou- racil and recombinant alpha-2a-interferon in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophageus. Proc ASCO 9:119

89. Takagi K, Fukushima Y, Takano M, et al (1992) Exogenous and endogenous TNF therapy for advanced colorectal can- cer. Ann Oncol 1:167

90. Takekoshi H, Yoshida K, Moringa S (1992) Im-

Page 9: Cytokine-based biotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors

534

munochemotherapy of carcinomtous peritonitis and pleuri- tis. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 19:1466-1469

91. Taleghani BM, Porowski P, Klink M, Gunzer U (1991) Inter- leukin-2 and alpha-interferon sc in combination with 5-fluo- rouracil and folinic acid iv in advanced progressive col- orectal cancer. Ann Hematol 6:126

92. Tang ZY, Liu KD, Bao YM, et al (1990) Radioimmunother- apy in the multimodality treatment of hepatocellular car- cinoma with reference to second look resection. Cancer 65:211-215

93. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (1990) A prospec- tive trial of recombinant human interferon-alpha-2b in pre- viously untreated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 66:135-139

94. Tsugita M, Yamauchi K, Komatsu T, Suzuki H, Hanyu F (1990) Induction and clinical utilization of lymphokine-acti- vated killer cells in patients with gastrointestinal tract can- cers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:110-115

95. Ubhi SS, Hollingworth J, Horsburgh T, Veitch PS, Franks CR, Bell PR (1992) Evaluation of the safety of recombinant interleukin-2 and recombinant interleukin-2 plus 5-fluorou- racil in the adjuvant treatment of gastric carcinoma patients. Anticancer Res 12:749-752

96. VonHoff DD, Fleming TR, MacDonald JS, et al (1990) Phase II evaluation of recombinant gamma-interferon in pa- tients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. J Biol Response Modif 9:584-587

97. Wadler S, Wiernik PH (1990) Clinical update on the role of fluorouracil and recombinant interferon-alpha-2a in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Semin Oncol 17:16- 21

98. Wadler S, Schwartz EL, Goldman M, et al (1989) Fluorou- racil and recombinant alpha-2a-interferon: an active regi-

men against advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 7:1769-1775

99. Wadler S (1991) The role of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 18:27-38

100. Wadler S, Lembersky B, Atkins M, Kirkwood J, Petrelli N (1991) Phase II trial of fluorouracil and recombinant inter- feron-alpha-2a in patients with advanced colorectal car- cinoma. J Clin Oncol 9:1806-1810

101. Weh HJ, Platz D, Braumann D, et al (1991) Treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma with 5-fluorouracil and in- terferon-alpha-2b. Proc AACR 32:93

102. Weiner LM, Steplewski Z, Koprowski H, Herlyn DM (1986) Biologic effects of gamma interferon pre-treatment followed by monoclonal antibody 17-1A administration in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma. Hybridoma 5: 65-77

103. Weiner LM, Haller DG, Kirkwood J, et al (1991) Phase II trial of repetitive murine monoclonal antibody therapy in pancreatic carcinoma. Proc ASCO 10:161

104. West WH, Tauer KW, Yannelli JR, Marshall GD, Thurman GB, Oldham RK (1987) Constant-infusion recombinant in- terleukin-2 in adoptive immunotherapy of advanced can- cer. New Engl J Med 316:898-905

105. Zaniboni A, Marpicati P, Simoncini E, et al (1991) Fluo- rouracil, high dose folinic acid, low-dose alpha-2b-interfer- on and dipyridamole in the treatment of advanced col- orectal cancer. J Chemother 3:180-182

106. Ziegler LD, Palazzolo P, Cunningham J, Janus M, Itoh K, Hayakawa K, Murray JL (1992) Phase I trial of murine monoclonal antibody L6 in combination with subcuta- neous interleukin-2 in patients with advanced carcinoma of the breast, colorectum, and lung. J Clin Oncol 10:1470- 1478