Gernot Pohl Uppsala – 05.04.2019

Steingauquartier - Kirchheim unter Teck

2

3

4

5

6

competition result 2010

KLE Architekten

Kirchheim unter Teck

7

Project Timeline

2010 Competition involving selected architects

2011 – 2016 Negotiations with land owners

2011 – 2017 zoning plan process

(important: decision for first option of property for the city)

2013 - development of „Kirchheimer Modell“

Commissioning of external consultants

2015 City council resolution “Kirchheimer Modell”

2017 Land Property, conclusion of development plan

start of allocation process

2018 Land purchased, zoning plan in legal effect, start of allocation process

2019 Start of building construction

8

9

-

„Kirchheimer Modell“

- Sale single of plots only (not parts of / entire blocs!)

- … to CoHousing-projects, professionnal developers, families, single investors ….

- … ranked by project quality - General description of housing project

- Participants, architect, project‘s management

- Site preference

- Preferred size, stated flexibility regarding size of the buliding

- Decision criterias - Project quality

- Experience of architect, project manager

- Benefit for the neighborhood

- Benefit for the urban community

- Defined approach - Main developer/secondary projects

- Forming of allocation comm. - Head of administration / all departments involved

- Representatives from all city council fractions

- Representatives of advisory council for design

- Members of public

- External consultants

- Decision on plot prices

Quotes from City Council Session 2015-06-24

... I couldn’t imagine a more complicated proposal

... this constitutes improper market interference, regulation frenzy

... dealing in real estate is not in the public administration’s job description

... this process seems overly complicated, expensive and time consuming

... Kirchheim unter Teck is not Tübingen

... successful conclusion of the project seems uncertain

... would developers in Kirchheim even want to participate

... there is no plan B

... “this whole process is the result …

… of a very limited point of view of an ideologically (mis)guided urban planner”

10

11

Plot prices

project calculation

project phases

12

expenses 16,6 Mio €

Land property, civil

engineering, management,

public spaces …

receipts 17,2 Mio €

Plot sales

internal communication

13

- Persuasive efforts within administration

- Political backing from the head of administration

- Close collaboration between different administration departments (urban planning, civil

engineering, building authorities, property register)

- Efficient organisation (well defined responsibilities, clear timetable, transparency, outside

perspective of external consultants)

- Political persuasion (visits to completed developments with city council members, notaries, bank

employees, property developers)

- Regular reports to city council

- Strictly standardised procedures and milestones (conferences, negotiations, forms, allocation

commission)

- Circulation of questionnaires, public register of applicants

- Regular newsletter

- Public events for co-housing applicants

- Education sessions for architects on co-housing

- Visits to completed developments with architects and applicants

- Special arrangement with banks and notaries (preferential rates for Co-Housing projects)

- Regular press meetings

- Continuously updated website / forum

external communication

14

Public communication

15

Project realization

schedule 2. phase

16

3 Wochen

7 Wochen

4 Wochen

11 Wochen

17

3 Wochen

6 Wochen

28 Wochen

16 Wochen ab

Ankernutzervergabe

Project realization

schedule 2. phase

18

session of

allocation committee

bloc

Underground Car-park

Existing building

Main developer

CoHousing project

Professional developer

Family housing

19

FZK ZwoDrei

1./2. floor orthodontist

MiZ

All app. 10% reduced

rental fees

High thermal insulation

standard

Freiheit 8+1

1 business space

2 app. at 33% reduced

rental fees

Waldetagen

Complete timber house

WerkStadt

2 app. at 33% reduced rental

fees

Community open Studio /

Atelier

Quarter office of a property

manangement

Main developer

CoWorking-Space

2 Atelier-Appartments

2 Cluster-housings

Bloc 2

20

Nestbau

20% of living space at 33%

reduced rental fees

CoWorking / CoLiving -

spaces

Dementia commune

Impuls

All appts. 10% reduced rental

fees

E.Z.A. 4.0

High thermal insulation standard

1 App. at 33% reduced rental fees

2 Parkings for Carsharing

Forum for social neighbourhood

development

Lebenshilfe DYCK

counseling Center für handicaped persons

ambulant commune for handicaped persons

Commun roof-terrasse

Lückenfüller

Family Housing

Chamäleon

Main developer II

Complete building with

33% reduced rental fees

Lebensreich

32% of living space as

Cluster Housing

20% of living space 10%

reduced rental fees

Haus der Generationen

Children‘s day care

association

High thermal insulation

standard

Bloc 4

Main developer I

Big commun room for

neighbourhood

KirchHeimat

Family housing

21

Main developer

Business space

Cluster Housing unit

Service Wohnen Steingau

Housing for Seniors with free

selectable support

Diverse commun rooms

Bloc 7

Dyck & WEK

Café, bakery and icecream

production by handicaped

persons

Senior Housing with 10% reduced

rental fees

22

Bloc 3

maindeveloper I

1 Atelier space

Main developer II

1 office space

KDW

District Center

Diakonie

Business space

Wohnkonzept

Family Housing Haus Fernengel

Dentist /

orthodontist

4 Appts. at 33%

reduced rental fees

Pocketpark

Midwife surgery

Green fassade

1 Appt. 10% reduced

rental fee

Naturhaus

1 Guest appartement

Complete timber house

Complete green fassade

Im Steingau

1 Guest appartement

Neighbourhood

organization

Full house

Business space

Hand in Hand

Business spaces

All Appts. 10%

reduced rental fee

Spektrum

Coworking Space

2 Appts. with reduced

rental fees

Baufeld 6

Main developer BG

Stadtregal

Office of Architecture

Zwischen(t)raum

Family Housing

23

Bloc 2

24

25

Bloc 4

26

27

Quotes from City Council Sessions 2018-03-07 and 2019-02-27

... we are amazed and impressed by the proposed projects and ideas

... the opportunity for developing a new city quarter has been seized

... each proposal would positively impact both neighborhood and urban community

... the city quarter’s character has been formed through the decision criteria

... the approach has obviously proven successful

… the novel procedure has proven viable and innovative

... this project demonstrates what an impact long-term thinking of policy-makers can have

... and should be applied to future larger projects

Bloc 6

2020

28

Commun courtyards

Französisches Viertel Tübingen 29

Bloc 2

Commun courdyard

31

Public space

32

Gernot Pohl

Stadt Kirchheim unter Teck

Leitung Abteilung Städtebau und Baurecht

g.pohl@kirchheim-teck.de

07021-502439 33