39
understanding ad formats key ingredients to advertising success Laura Chaibi Director of Research and Insights, EMEA

Yahoo! understanding ad formats - dmexco workshop

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Insight into what consumers think of advertising online and how to create formats that win over the hearts of consumers and meet advertisers' needs. Yahoo! is investing in understanding how to get advertising right for its audiences, are you?

Citation preview

  • 1. understanding ad formats key ingredients to advertising success Laura Chaibi Director of Research and Insights, EMEA

2. Advertising people who ignore research are as dangerous as generals who ignore decodes of enemy signals Werbetreibende, die Forschung ignorieren sind genauso gefhrlich wie Generle, die die Dechiffrierung von feindlichen Nachrichten ignorieren. David Ogilvy 3. journey to ad format enlightenment online ad developments striking consumer / advertiser balance best use of ad space theory to practice: planning 4. brand creative media ad format ad 5. microsite expandable push down 68b online ads in Germany (H1 2010) skyscraper flash layer overlay pre roll tandem banner popup which one do you choose? social ads 6. super banner + LREC (working together) = tandem ad format mix and match: overwhelming choice 7. super banner + LREC (working together) + overlay = tandem + floating auto initiated mouse over on click 8. consumer / advertiser balance 9. 80% of ad formats tested have been approved to run on Yahoo! Yahoo! can help you 10. knowledge building best in class ad format use campaign testing 5 countries: Germany UK France Italy Spain 100+ ad formats (blue bubbles) 50,000 consumers consulted from theory to application for brand advertising planning tool ad format testing 11. low impact high intrusion high impact high intrusion high impact low intrusion low impact low intrusion a framework for decision making impact intrusion 12. Low Impact LowIntrusion Base: Yahoo! User UK, Source: Yahoo! Research, absolute score a = auto initiated; f = floating; m = mouse over, c = click) Custom Expandable (m, f) Floating (a) Video (a) Slidingroom (c) Graphical Wallpaper (a, f) Expandable (m) Autoinitiated (a) Custom (animated) Mail Tandem (m, f) Exspondo (a, wallpaper) Custom ad (animated, f)) Mail Tandem Ad Exspondo (a) LREC Background plain color change (no f) Graphical Wallpaper (no f) MPU interstitial Mail Log Out Video Interstitial High Impact low impact low intrusion high impact low intrusion low impact high intrusion high impact high intrusion HighIntrusion 13. Low Impact LowIntrusion Base: Yahoo! User UK, Source: Yahoo! Research, absolute score a = auto initiated; f = floating; m = mouse over, c = click) Custom Expandable (m, f) Floating (a) Video (a) Slidingroom (c) Graphical Wallpaper (a, f) Expandable (m) Autoinitiated (a) Custom (animated) Mail Tandem (m, f) Exspondo (a, wallpaper) Custom ad (animated, f)) Mail Tandem Ad Exspondo (a) LREC Background plain color change (no f) Graphical Wallpaper (no f) MPU interstitial Mail Log Out Video Interstitial High Impact HighIntrusion 14. Custom Expandable (m, f) Floating (a) Video (a) Slidingroom Graphical Wallpaper (a, f) Expandable (m) Autoinitiated (a) Custom (animated) Mail Tandem (m, f) Exspondo (a, wallpaper) Custom ad (animated, f)) Mail Tandem Ad Exspondo (a) LREC Background plain color change (no f) Graphical Wallpaper (no f) MPU interstitial Mail Log Out Video Interstitial High Impact HighIntrusion Low Impact LowIntrusion a = auto initiated; f = floating; m = mouse over, c = click) Base: Yahoo! User UK, Source: Yahoo! Research, absolute score 15. consumer favourite: slideshow in action... 16. homepage ad variant testing Recruiting Random sample in Yahoo! Connections panel Survey Standardized online survey with random ad exposure Base All Yahoo! Users 14+ Field Time February / March 2010 Sample Size n = 2,103 relative acceptability 17. acceptability = impact - intrusion -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Custom ad (animated bckgrnd with floating) Exspondo - no retracting with wallpaper Colourchange Floating Custom Autoinitiated Exspondo - no retracting Standard MPU interstitial Mail Tandem Ad / user initiated floating Mail Log Out MPU Video Interstitial Custom ad (animated bckgrnd no floating) Mail Tandem Ad / no floating Graphical Wallpaper w/o floating Background plain color change w/o floating Expandable (News) Video Expandable slidingroom LREC Base: Yahoo! user, Source: Yahoo! Research standard deviation from the mean 18. format(s) creative media ad behaviour ad 19. putting theory into practice: live campaign 20. Low Impact High Impact LowIntrusionHighIntrusion Base: Yahoo! user, Source: Yahoo! Research mail tandem control ad (normalised) mail tandem live campaign A brand/creative impacted format negatively mail tandem live campaign B brand/creative fit ad format 2x uplift -1x (less) impact (brand X) 21. vs. what we do... what we say 22. best use of ad space do actions speak louder than words? 23. phase II: ad format testing with usage metrics how do different creative executions of the same ad impact on ad effectiveness acceptability 24. ad monadic testing 2000+ respondents 5 ad format variants Yahoo! homepage 25. what they do (technical measurement) time spent site usage ad click / mouse roll over interaction what they say (survey) advertising recall brand awareness brand image ad assessment homepage assessment + 26. control group: LREC Yahoo! house ad 27. creative control group: LREC + mini banner 28. take over with floating auto initiated & mouse over 31 29. take over with floating and animated background 30. 100 112 144 140 152 control group LREC mouseover autoinitiated take over + animated bckgrd ad recall index = control group (cg) Base: Yahoo! User / Source: Yahoo! Research * compared to control group +40%* uplift for ad format + ad behaviour 31. 100 204 190 250 LREC mouseover autoinitiated take over + animated bckgrd aided recall of advertiser: McDonalds index (LREC= 100) 2.5x* higher recall for most intrusive ad format Base: Yahoo! User / Source: Yahoo! Research * compared to control group 32. 21 18 17 30 21 24 Average control group LREC mouseover autoninitated take over + animated bckgrd browsing duration time spent in seconds (till first click) +33%* time spent with full page takeover +67%* time spent with mouse over ??? touch metrics Base: Yahoo! User / Source: Yahoo! Research * compared to control group 33. control group LREC mouseover autoninitated take over + animated bckgrd Chart Title very good good theory to practice: full page takeovers successful appeal of Yahoo! homepage in % (Top 2 Box on 5-Point scale) 92% 87% 85% 86% 88% Base: Yahoo! User / Source: Yahoo! Research most intrusive ad in theory has highest likeability in practice 34. theory to practice: planning 35. best use of ad format spaces high impact / low intrusion best win win quadrant compliment consumer journey format accepted as part of page suitable for most brands ! format desensitisation: over time becomes low impact / low intrusion high impact / high intrusion ! effective with right brand / creative ! relevant: campaign obj. & audience these formats get message across use for: burst message, time bound offer, new product launch, awareness, limited opportunity, familiar brand low impact / low intrusion least disruptive suits editorial info (news/sports) drip feed campaign / sponsorship more acceptable: older consumer ! creative needs recognisable brand ! harder to get cut through low impact / high intrusion ! brand & ad intent matters! ! cap ad / limit ad format wear out ! use floating elements with care best for entertainment / homepage more acceptable: youth impact intrusion 36. thank you danke schn! Laura Chaibi Director of Research, EMEA Yahoo! Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 207 131 1466 Mobile: +44 (0)7976 454 503 Ricardo Rubio Gonzlez Head of Research Europe Yahoo! Email: [email protected] Tel: +(49) 89 231 97-555 Mobile: +(49) 162 288 99 67 for further information