Hampe - Renz - Schnepf 2011_Spinoz'a Ethica

8/3/2019 Hampe - Renz - Schnepf 2011_Spinoz'a Ethica

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/hampe-renz-schnepf-2011spinoza-ethica 1/14

INRODUCION: SPINOZA’S EHICA ORDINEGEOMERICO DEMONSRAA

Mh H, U Rz, R Sh

1. Aim and Systematic Intention

Sz’ Ethics h j

hh. I hh q, : , hh , h, -, h , hh, h-h, -h, hh , f, h ‘f h’ h , h . T - Sz . A .I h , w f w . Sf w h

h . R h hw w w h q wh h . Sz h w q w h h . Wh A Bh, (wh Ch), h hw h w h h h-h w h , Sz w: “I hI h h hh. I w h I h hh.”1

T q, hw, : hw, x, w

h Ethics? F h :

1) Ontological presupposition instead o deontological oundation.Sz’ Ethics h whhw h q ‘Wh h I ?’ wh hh h-h . I x hw h - h h

1 E. 76; G 4: 319.



2 introduction

w h x. Sz’ Ethics h h x, wh whh h h

wh h .2) Naturalism. Sz h

whh w. S, hh h whh . T h Sz x bonum morale. I, h h w bonum naturale whh— — h . I , hw, w whh h whh

h.3) Universality. I h j ,

Sz h wh h . T Ethics hh h: hh , h q whh h , h h j h w. I , h, h h f . T h h Ethics q q wh . H, , w (445); h, h h h, w (442).

4) Epistemological anti-scepticism. G wh f h - h h w , h . Sz’ Ethics h h h

h h h w. Cq, h Ethics j .

5) Necessity and Systematicity. Sz h h h hh necessarily and systematically . T h h h f h Ethics’ f . Sz , hw, - h w h hh f w w h h h -h -

w h q , ’ h h.



introduction 3

Sz h h . I, h E’ Elements. H h , “ordine geo-

metrico demonstrata”. A h , Szh w f, x, , . T h f- x— . E w h w hh. T h h w h . A wh w wh h . O h h

h h w .B, h x , wh h h q h ‘ x’ q. T Sz h h w h h h hh .

2. Background, Conception and Publication

T h h Ethics F 1678 E. T w . Sz’f h w, Principles o Cartesian Philosophy (1663), -

h wh h whh W Bh, wh w h . I h, Szh C h h h 1660.2 A h h h ractatus

theologico-politicus h h Sz wh h . L, h Ethics, Sz x h wh h h “ ” (115). H w h h F E.3 T A hh L h, h h hh

2 Lé/M (1999: 5).3 K (1989: 318.); K (1996: 18).



4 introduction

h. Sz h h4 q h .5 I h wh -

Sz’ h, h wh h hhw , h h.6

Wh h h ractatus theologico-politicus 1670,Sz w h -. R w h. Lz h ractatus h h .7 O , Sz h h h h. I , h h, whh h h

h f h , h, h whh w h libertas philosophandi. Ahh hhh w h h ’ , Szw h Nh. Nh, hh hh h h . S h h h - h h E h h S.8

G h , h h Sz h h Ethics wh h 1675. w , h h j h O Ph H. T h S h Sz hh w h hh, h h - h h w h h z .9 Sz h h h 10 wh whh h , whh w h

h h h w: “” (“caute”).Wh h , Sz w h h h Ethics w h w w . I h w h Lz, wh

Sz 1676 D H. Ahh Lz h w

4 Bh (1988: 896).5 N (1999: 103.).6 C. h Sz G: Shö (1987) O (1994).7

G (1999: 61.); G (2001: 8.).8 C. I (2001: 285.).9 E. 47; G 4: 235.

10 E. 48; G 4: 236.



introduction 5

Sz’ h , h h h h Ethics F

1678 h Opera posthuma, whh h .T h h Ethics w h

x q h h Eh- . Wh Sz F 1677, h hR h T H A h Ch R w w x. I h, Sz h h hw h , , L Dh .I h Ethics, h w h ractatus logico-

politicus, whh Sz h , h ractatus de intellectus emendatione h Compendium Grammatices Linguae Hebraeae. A I11 h , h w z h, h h w h , , h .

I w Sz’ wh h hEthics h h. wh x w h - h h q whh h - Sz’ w .12

3. Positions

T Ethics f , : O God , O the Nature and Origin o the Mind , O the Origin and Nature o the Afects, O HumanBondage, o the Powers o the Afects O the Power o the Intel-lect, o Human Freedom. T h f h

h h h G— h 13— h h w. P f h h h h h h w h , h h w .Sz’ hh h j. T - h h h hEthics h . I , h

11 I (2001: 288).12 S (1994).13 Sh (1996: 103).



6 introduction

h hh, h hh h h h. T, , h hw

, h, h h, , . Sz h . F, , .

I h h , S-z h f h Ethics wh f hq , whh h “G” “N”. “Wh- , G, h wh G.”(115) T x . I

h G wh h w.P : G h h w h.Fh, h A h w h h w , hC , whh h. T w h w G, w whh : x h. A h f h . T h A- , .. h h f h. U h , Sz hw h h, -, h h . Nh h h w, h wh .

I h f h h Ethics, Sz h h . R h h , h hw h w

h h. O h x, h h wh D, h h h j whh j , h h-. T h q h -w, whh, - Sz, q. T hEthics whh hC h z . I h h ,

whh q, , h . G x, h h . Sz h h x wh



introduction 7

h h . T

h h h w h .H h , Sz

h conatus h h h Ethics: h . Wh h - ‘’ , wh h , ‘’. G j h hh w h whhw f . O h , Sz h f h h h h h hh.

U h h, h hw - . I w h h, w h wh h . I ,hw, h q h - h

hw h w . W h w h h h w - h . I w h h h j h , h h (343).Sz x h -j wh h h imitatio afectuus: w, (327). AhhSz h h - h, h h h h. T h, h “[] h j” (351), w h hh x . S, -

, Sz . Ah , h h hh q j.

T Ethics h h. I h , whh Sz x h h h- . F, Sz, reedom rom: h h - h w h -

. S Sz’ h hhh h h h . H hh h h



8 introduction

h. P wh h h j -

-. Ph h Sz h h - ‘F Sh’, h “h h”.14 A h, h h x wh wh h j ’ h h . B h , Sz’ h hh h ractatus theologico-

politicus h h Ethics.F h

hw. T , h — hx ’ h wh. T , whh hw ’ w ’ w x. T ’ w . T h x h, h h G N. Szh h h w, h h . T w x h- , , , - w h. I h ,h h h h .

4. Reception

A w, h h w -— h h f Sz’Ethics. N h h , h h hx h , h q wh

14 C. A (1973); A/Hh (1971).



introduction 9

h hh x h h hh. D h w h hz

Sz’ w, h h w hh h h18h 19h . ‘Sz’ ‘- h’ h h h f h hh j.

T x h Sz’ hh h h, h hh PB h h Dictionnaire historique et critique,15 h h. Sq, h - ‘Sz

’ 1786. I wh M Mh,Jh Hh J h L, Gh’ Prometheus, h “f” h h “Sz”.16 I h h h , J wh h Sz’ hh h , h q whh w “ ” h Ch h.17 T - wh Mh, J’ , w - h Ethics, whh h h Gh, Sz Gh, Sh, H W. Fh J’ h h Sz’ w reli- gious — h h—18 whh h - ‘C Phh’, whh h wh . Fh h j h - h - f . O h h ,

h Sz h ‘G I’ Sh- H.19 H’ , h “h h h x, , q w j”20 Sz h h j-

15 B (2003: 367–439).16 J (1785: 12.).17 J (1998: 20); (1974); G (2001), S

(2000).18 S S (2000).19 Wh (1992); F (1994); Ehh (1994).20 H (1986, W 3:23).



10 introduction

hh hh. I F, h w Ah, h - “H Sz” hh

h .21

T h W C G I h - Sz “ ” (w h h L J)22 h f hh . I h 19h , hh- h w . Wh G- I h w h f fh hEthics, h h h Sz’ j w w: h h h hh

w w wh . N w hh h G T Fh23 JhMü24 Sz, h hh h h . Fh Nzh, , wh hamor ati z Sz “”25 wh, , h h wh “”—h mos geometricus—h hh w whh h w w .26 I F, h h hh V C h h Sz hh hh f Chh.27 Sz w h x, whhh h hh, .28 F, h w h hh S F Sz. F h w Sz’ h h h. B h h “ j ” hh h h h f x hx .29 I h

h w Sz’ hh F’ ‘ h’, whh h h h?

21 Ah (1998: 181.) w Mh (1990).22 J (1785: 32.).23 M h H (1993).24 C. H (1992).25

L O, 1881, Nzh (1955, V. 3: 1171).26 Nzh (1955, V. 2, §5: 570).27 M (1994: 227); M (1996: 422.).28 M (1994: 237).29 F (1999, V. 14: 64).



introduction 11

I h 20h , Sz hx Bh H (F.H. B J.E.M. M)

N-. Jh C w Sz 1888 H.H. Jh w Sz 1901, h h .30 H, Sz -h h, f , h . I Space, ime and Deity, hN- S Ax Sz h- .31 I h x, S-z h h h h- . O hh

, Sz h h. E’ j- h h q h (“G ”) h h h w geometrically intelligible (. h h ) w - Sz’ h . L F, Ew w h w w h Sz xh h h , h w w.32 T h Sz w hh w h H H, H K C Sh, wh h h hhh, w .33 A 1947, C Sh w “T z h G , j h h -, h ‘’ h D N.”34 T h Sz h h .35 T h Sz h - h h N Lh, wh

q Sz h h Te Society o Society: “Iq , ” (12).B h C Gh h h L — -

h — Sz’ w H 1926,Sz w w-h h h G, wh h w h

30 C (1888) Jh (1901).31

Ax (1966: 389) Ax (1938: 332–348 349–387).32 C. P (1986).33 Wh (1994); L/Hh (1991) S (1991).34 Sh (1991: 28).35 C. L (1994); G (2003).



12 introduction

f. B 1933, h N S h Sz G, whh

h h . Sz h h j - h h h h Nh- I. B , - Sz h F h x A-A hh. I F,Sz w h 1960 w hx D. I ww M G, Ax Mh G Dz.A h w Dz Ah, Sz

h wh w h -.I h hh E S, h h Ethics w x. I h h A N, Jh B Ch J h h Ethics, — h N J— h h h w Sz.36 T Sz h Fh Eh hh h hw h . E , h S Hh’ Spinoza E C’ Spinoza’s Metaphysics, w w, h . T w hh G B. F (, , ), S-z h , wh q wh hh ‘’, .. h w G Dz.37 L E F, D z Sz - h , h h w w

h wh h h hh h h . “I ”, h 1993 w wh Kh Gü, “ h wh h .”38

36 N (1975); J (1978).37

C. h Sz h h h Diférence et Répé-tition; Sw (1992: 133–142); D (1982: 212); D (1999); F- (1999: 42. 95.).

38 Gü (1993: 162).



introduction 13

5. Relevance

T h w Sz h h h-h h w - h h h wh h : h Ethics . “M Sz”, Ah h “ , q’ x: q’ x j’h. P î, î ”.39

Sz’ hh j w h h h h h w whhh hh h . I ,

h x h Ethics h f hw hh h hq.

T h h hh whh , , w f. I h 19h , h h hh- h h h lives h h-h w w h ( h), h Mx K, h, x hh . FMx, h h h h h h. K, h wh h -f H’ , h h hh h h h h wh h h. T h hh h h j, h h w- (h

h f ), relevance h , - h hh A . B h , w-w, h h h h hhh.40 T hh h literary , whh, h , h h . Whh h h

39 Ah (1998: 182).40 R (1988).



14 introduction

h h wh h-h h w h j h z

w, h . T h, h h , w j h h .41

T Sz’ h , h h, h hh h hh h - q - hh. I’

hh. Sz’ hh , h , h whh h hh . R h w h , whh, wh wh h hh Sz, h h - . Nh, w- f hh w h . A , w h h wh h f h h, - h h h, .

41 A B W ruth and ruthulness, W (2002: 3).

Documents

Hampe - Renz - Schnepf 2011_Spinoz'a Ethica