Upload
zeke
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Accreditation in Germany, Scope of Duties of the Central Authority of the German Federal States for Safety – ZLS regarding the Pressure Equipment Directive. Johann Dietrich Zentralstelle der Länder für Sicherheitstechnik -ZLS- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Accreditation in Germany, Accreditation in Germany, Scope of Duties of the Central Scope of Duties of the Central
Authority of the German Federal Authority of the German Federal States for Safety – ZLS regarding theStates for Safety – ZLS regarding the
Pressure Equipment DirectivePressure Equipment Directive
Johann Dietrich
Zentralstelle der Länder für Sicherheitstechnik -ZLS-Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt, Gesundheit und VerbraucherschutzCentral Authority of the Federal States for SafetyBavarian State Ministry for Environment, Public Health and Consumer ProtectionBucharest, February 2007
• Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik – BSI (Federal Office for Security in the Information Technology)
• Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle für Umwelt – DAU (German Accreditation Body of Environmental Verifiers)
• Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik – DIBt (German Institute for Building and Civil Engineering Technologies)
• Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt – KBA (Federal Authority of Road Transport)
• Regulierungsbehörde für Telekommunikation und Post – RegTP (Accreditation Body of the Regulatory Authority for Telecommunications and Posts)
• Zentralstelle der Länder für Gesundheitsschutz – ZLG (Central Authority of the German Federal Statesf for Health Protection with regard to Medical Products and Medical Devices)
Accreditation Bodies - mandatory area -
• Zentralstelle der Länder für Sicherheitstechnik – ZLS (Central Authority of the GermanFederal States for Safety)
• Maintaining and improving the state of the art of the safety of products, equipment as well as labour and consumer safety reached in the Federal Republic of Germany
ZLS – Scope of dutiesZLS fulfils tasks in the following fields
• Accreditation, recognition and designation according to the - Equipment and Product Safety Act , - Medical Devices Act (active medical devices), - Transport of Dangerous Goods Act, - Ship Safety Act
• Accreditation of conformity assessment bodies (CABs) within the frame of Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRA)
ZLS – Scope of duties (continued)• Accreditation and recognition of Conformity
Assessment Bodies within the frame of the GS- Mark
• Supervision of all activities of notified bodies
• Organising the sectoral and central exchange of experience activities
• Participation in Notifying Authorities Forum at European level
• Coordination of activities with the non-regulatory accreditation bodies
MonitoringMonitoring
ZLS
Procedure - Designation/NotificationApplicationApplication
Assessment by ZLSAssessment by ZLS
Assessment criteriaAssessment criteria
Accreditation by ZLSAccreditation by ZLS
DesignationDesignation
Notification to the EU-Notification to the EU-Commission and Member Commission and Member
StatesStatesPublication in the Official Publication in the Official JournalJournal
Notified Body Notified Body
Annex ofAnnex ofEC DirectivesEC Directives
EN EN 45000/1700045000/17000
series series StandardsStandards
Duration of Accreditation / Notification Accreditation procedures are subject to national and
sometimes international agreements, duration is mostly 5 years
Surveillance audits (monitoring) at regular intervals (1 to 2 years) and for defined purposes(e. g. enlarging the scope, major changes in the organisation, problems occured, etc.)
Notification with no determined duration, can be repealed either if so wished by the body or if extensive irregularities are signalled
Requirements for Notified Bodies
Notified bodies involved in conformity assessment take over Notified bodies involved in conformity assessment take over duties but not all responsibilities of manufacturers !duties but not all responsibilities of manufacturers !
No design, construction, marketing or maintenance activities
No commercial or financial pressures or interests
Skilled, trained staff, facilities, equipment necessary for the tests, administrative possibilities
Adequate liability insurance, unless liability is assumed by the State
Defined by directives (Annexes IV/V 97/23/EC)
No involvement in activities that may conflict with their independence, integrity, impartiality or secrecy
Documentation related to possible subcontractors
Documentation to be prepared by NBs
Documentation demonstrating the ability of the organisation to meet the minimum criteria set out in the relevant annex (-es) of the directive(s) for which notification is sought (either by using standards or by other means)
Quality management documentation must reflect the actual situation in the organisation and needs to be focused on the future activity as a notified body
Commitment to following the rules of conduct, best practices and to cooperate with the accreditation body and other authorities
Application forms as required by authorities / accreditation bodies
Ability to draw up technical reports must be flanked by ability to responsibly draw up certificates
Issues related to secrecy, certificates supervision and archiving
Criteria for notified bodies Additional documents
Guide to the implementation of directives based on New Approach and Global Approach („blue guide“)
93/465/EEC - Council Decision of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonization directives
DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
DIN EN 45011 - General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems
DIN EN 45012 – General requirements for bodies operating assessment and operation of quality systems
DIN EN 17020 – General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection
ZLS within the Frame of Product and Equipment Safety
• ZLS is part of a unit in the Bavarian Ministry for Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
• Acts on behalf of authorities in all other German Federal States on the basis of a State Contract (no other competent authority in these fields of activity in other Federal States)
• Is co-ordinated and advised by representatives of all Federal States and the Federal Government
ZLS within the Frame of the Product and Equipment Safety Act
• ZLS provides in the administrative documents for co-operation of all notified bodies (and GS- Mark granting bodies) with the accreditation body with regard to tests and certification results of possibly defective products on the market
• ZLS exchanges information with market surveillance authorities in Germany, of other Member States of the EU and authorities of third countries with a view to enhancing safety of products for professional, as well as for consumer use
Activities in the field of Directive 97/23/EC
• Before accreditation in a field is started preliminary work is initiated
• Sectoral committees with the participation of all stakeholders are convened (manufacturers, users, interest groups, authorities, standardizers, professional associations, testing and certification organisations, etc.)
• Criteria set out by EU and national documents are concretized, final documents define more specific requirements
Activities in the field of Directive 97/23/EC
• Documents are being made accessible to applicants
• Sectoral committees remain active to allow for corrective actions and to provide guidance to the accreditation body
• Necessary application forms available on the website
• Determine which kinds of accreditation are most suitable (test laboratory, certification body for products, quality assurance systems, personnel)
• Determine specific way of handling special cases (e.g. Recognized Third-Party Organization, User Inspectorates)
Accreditation process• Applicants submit all necessary evidence needed for
recognition• Ability to assess results is considered not to be sufficient,
always also proof of in-house testing possibilities (facilities, testing equipment and personnel)
• Substantial evidence for quality management systems implemented, professional and in some cases vocational training of personnel, experience gained so far in the relevant field, participation in standardization work, ability to determine necessary tests and to carry out assessment of results against the requirements of the directive (not „only“ against standards), ability to assess also against requirements of other national or foreign codes and to perform scientific work in the absence of standards or codes
Assessment of documents and on-site• All documents are being assessed by trained personnel of ZLS• In case necessary specific knowledge is not available, determining
independent specialists in the relevant technical field and involvement of them in the assessment
• On-site review and check whether documents forwarded reflect the actual situation
• If several offices or subsidiaries, on-site assessment of them• In case subcontractors are involved, evidence of their suitability,
review of contracts, agreements and in the absence of accreditation in the relevant field, on-site assessment of them
• In case activities abroad are likely, review of all the procedures applicable, of working contracts with staff working abroad and of the way responsible personnel of the notified body ensures quality of work, documentation and responsibilities
Accreditation and designation• If the applicant organization satisfies the accreditation
requirements formal recognition is granted• At the same time the designation and subsequent
notification process is started• Notification is somewhat more simple nowadays, as it is
being done electronically by means of the NANDO database
• Notification is only the goal to be reached, permanently satisfying the notification requirements is a constant challenge, in order to remain eligible and to get better
• ZLS has also the task to provide evidence at all levels of the way criteria have been met by the bodies and to monitor all activities of them, be it in Germany, in other Member States or elsewhere
Monitoring notified bodies• The act of designation contains also information and
conditions on subsidiaries and their involvement in the overall conformity assessment
• Basically two ways to perform tests and certification: Substantial parts of testing and inspection done on the site
of the notified body, some tests (e.g. pressure test) on the premises of the manufacturer (in or outside the EU), certification in the office of the notified body (in Germany)
Substantial parts of required testing and inspection in the offices of the notified body (e.g. design, documentation provided by the manufacturer), on-site tests at the manufacturer site and certification by personnel of the notified body detached to the respective country
N.B.: Subcontracting certification is not allowed!
Monitoring notified bodies• Documentation on who and where carried out tests and
inspections needs to be forwarded to the certification body, i.e. notified body
• Accreditation clauses require from the notified body to produce all evidence of the conformity assessment process to be inspected by the authority (ZLS)
• The strategy adopted allows for quick information possibilities for the designating authority
• Checks of subcontracted work are also possible under the terms of these provisions (as the notified body retains the whole responsibility)
• If necessary, the designating authority can also check the premises of subsidiaries or subcontractors abroad
• The work of certification, if done outside the country of origin of the notified body, is subject to special arrangements to be observed at all times and monitored by ZLS
Subsidiaries outside Germany of companies notified under the PED
• If subsidiaries of German notified bodies are located in other EU Member States, they can act as subcontractors for their parent company (only for testing and inspection work). If they wish to become notified body themselves, they need to apply to the authorities in charge in the country they are registered and undergo the notification process according to the rules set by them
• „Licensing“ of subsidiaries to perform certification work on behalf of the notified body in the country of origin is not possible for legal reasons
• Nevertheless, even if working as subcontractors, these subsidiaries need to observe the laws of their „host“ countries and the rules and procedures imposed by the contracts with their parent company (who is responsible for the results delivered)
Certification staff abroad• Needs to know and follow the procedures of the notified
body• Has the obligation to participate regularly in exchanges of
experience organized by the notified body• Remains fully responsible to the head of the notified body
(technically, administratively, disciplinary)• Can, under circumstance, be the citizen of the
„host“country and even perform other types of work (not certification) if there are neither conflicts of interests nor activities impairing their ability to act as personnel of the notified body (part time activities)
• No certification activities in the same field for two notified bodies!
• Needs to be hired by the organization which is notified
Is the system efficient?• Yes! (So far...)• Additional work for the designating authority....• Can become a burden, if huge companies develop „global
player“ strategies, for the frequency of controls raises and travel time too...
• The number of the notified bodies is still very high, the costs, however should be kept low...
• Still, competition among the bodies plays a significant role• With the growing dimensions of notified bodies „fears“ to
lose notification, with all the consequences also grow...• Potential for authorities to get hold of adverse information
is higher, still cooperation with other national authorities is necessary!
Are there other strategies? For sure!• Making the notification preceding and monitoring activities
more expensive?• Supervising abroad activities of notified bodies not in a
somewhat „remote“ manner but by frequent visits of the foreign sites?
This is not exactly meeting the needs of the manufacturing industry or of the „accompanying“ conformity assessment community! Nor is it helping small and medium sized enterprises to survive in the ever growing competition with the industry outside the EU!
Cooperation with market surveillance and occupational health and safety authorities across the EU, better contacts with designating authorities and accreditation bodies may help get hold of possible problems
What is the future bringing?• Activities of the CAB forum to concentrate on the problems
of notified bodies and to help assuring a „level playing field“ for them and thereby also for the manufacturing industry
• Cooperation of designating and notifying authorities to allow for comparable results of assessments of bodies seeking notification
• Constant monitoring of notified bodies, RTPOs and user inspectorates in their home country and abroad
• Exchange of experience of the CAB community with all its members
• Appropriate measures of the competent authorities in Member States against non-compliant products (market surveillance) and against bodies not fulfilling (any more) the notification criteria
• Strive of all stakeholders to ensure an appropriate level of safety on the European market for the benefit of its citizens
Thank you very much for your attention !
im
Location: Address: Contact:Rosenkavalierplatz 2 ZLS im StMUGV phone: +49 (0) 89 9214 2321D - 81925 München fax: +49 (0) 89 9214 3442
Postfach 810140 e-mail: [email protected] - 81901 München
Bayerischen Staatsministerium für Umwelt, Gesundheit und VerbraucherschutzBavarian State Ministry for Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection