Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis - Springer978-3-658-08764-7/1.pdf · 348 Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Macht und Ohnmacht internationaler

Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis

Literatur Abbott, Frederick M. 2001: NAFTA and the Legalization of World Politics: A Case Study, in: Gold-

stein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaughter, Anne-Marie (Hrsg.): Legalization and World Politics, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.], 135–163.

Abbott, Kenneth W./Keohane, Robert O./Moravcsik, Andrew/Slaughter, Anne-Marie/Snidal, Duncan 2000: The Concept of Legalization, in: International Organization 54: 3, 401–419.

Abbott, Kenneth W./Keohane, Robert O./Moravcsik, Andrew/Slaughter, Anne-Marie/Snidal, Duncan 2001: The Concept of Legalization, in: Goldstein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaughter, Anne-Marie (Hrsg.): Legalization and World Politics, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.], 17–35.

Abbott, Kenneth W./Snidal, Duncan 2001: Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance, in: Goldstein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaughter, Anne-Marie (Hrsg.): Legali-zation and World Politics, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.], 37–72.

Abromeit, Heidrun 1998: Ein Vorschlag zur Demokratisierung des europäischen Entscheidungssys-tems, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39: 1, 80–90.

Abromeit, Heidrun 2002: Wozu braucht man Demokratie? Die postnationale Herausforderung der De-mokratietheorie, Opladen.

Akermark, Spiliopoulou S./Marsaeter, Olle 2005: Treaties and the Limits of Flexibility, in: Nordic Journal of International Law 74: 3-4, 509–540.

Alcock, Antony 1971: History of the International Labour Organisation, London, Basingstoke. Alston, Philip 2004: 'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights

Regime, in: European Journal of International Law 15: 3, 457–521. Alston, Philip 2005: Facing Up to the Complexities of the ILO's Core Labour Standards Agenda, in:

European Journal of International Law 16: 3, 467–480. Amnesty International (15.11.2012): Public Statement. Civil Society rejects flawed ASEAN Human

Rights Declaration, in: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/IOR64/005/2012/en/7eacdb53-76a6-49d8-9466-dc7fdaeccec7/ior640052012en.pdf; eingesehen am 11.11.2013.

S. Stübig, Flexibilität und Legitimität in der ILO, Globale Gesellschaftund internationale Beziehungen, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-08764-7,© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

346 Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis

Anand, Ram Prakash 2010: The Formation of International Organizations and India: A Historical Study, in: Leiden Journal of International Law 23: 01, 5.

Armstrong, David/Farrell, Theo/Lambert, Hélène 2007: International Law and International Relations (Themes in International Relations), Cambridge.

Axelrod, Robert/Keohane, Robert O. 1993: Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and In-stitutions, in: Baldwin, David A. (Hrsg.): Neorealism and Neoliberalism. The Contemporary De-bate, New York, 85–115.

Bakvis, Peter/McCoy, Molly 2008: Core Labour Standards and International Organizations: What In-roads has Labour made? FES Briefing Paper No. 6 (Global Trade Union Programm), Bonn.

Bayne, Nicholas 2004: Hard and Soft Law in International Institutions: Complements, Not Alterna-tives, in: Kirton, John J./Trebilcock, Michael J. (Hrsg.): Hard Choices, Soft Law. Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment, and Social Governance, Aldershot, 347–352.

Beetham, David 1991: The Legitimation of Power (Issues in political theory), Basingstoke. Behrens, Maria/Reichwein, Alexander 2007: Global Governance, in: Benz, Arthur/Lütz, Susanne/Schi-

mank, Uwe/Simonis, Georg (Hrsg.): Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und em-pirische Anwendungsfelder, Wiesbaden, 311–324.

Beisheim, Marianne/Dingwerth, Klaus 2008: Procedural Legitimacy and Private Transnational Gov-ernance. Are the Good Ones Doing Better? (SFB-Governance working paper series), Berlin.

Beisheim, Marianne/Liese, Andrea/Ulbert, Cornelia 2007: Erfolgsbedingungen transnationaler Part-nerschaften: Hypothesen und erste Ergebnisse, in: Risse, Thomas/Lehmkuhl, Ursula (Hrsg.): Re-gieren ohne Staat? Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit, Baden-Baden, 247–271.

Benner, Thorsten/Reinicke, Wolfgang H./Witte, Jan M. 2004: Multisectoral Networks in Global Gov-ernance: Towards a Pluralistic System of Accountability, in: Government and Opposition 39: 2, 191–210.

Bennett, Andrew/Elman, Colin 2006: Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Meth-ods, in: Annual Review of Political Science 9: 1, 455–476.

Bennett, Andrew/George, Alexander L. 2005: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sci-ences, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.].

Blatter, Joachim K./Janning, Frank/Wagemann, Claudius 2007: Qualitative Politikanalyse. Eine Ein-führung in Forschungsansätze und Methoden, Wiesbaden.

Boekle, Henning/Rittberger, Volker/Wagner, Wolfgang 1999: Normen und Außenpolitik. Konstrukti-vistische Außenpolitiktheorie (Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur internationalen Politik und Friedens-forschung, Band 34), Tübingen.

Bohman, James 2010: Democratising the global order: from communicative freedom to communica-tive power, in: Review of International Studies 36: 2, 431–447.

Böhmert, Sabine 2002: Das Recht der ILO und sein Einfluß auf das deutsche Arbeitsrecht im Zeichen der europäischen Integration, Baden-Baden.

Börzel, Tanja A. 2006: Participation Through Law Enforcement, in: Comparative Political Studies 39: 1, 128–152.

Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis 347

Börzel, Tanja A./Risse, Thomas 2002: Die Wirkung internationaler Institutionen. Von der Normenan-erkennung zur Normeneinhaltung, in: Jachtenfuchs, Markus/Knodt, Michèle (Hrsg.): Regieren in internationalen Institutionen, Opladen, 141–181.

Bosch, Gerhard 2012: The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy: Negotiating for Social Justice, in: International Labour Review 151: 1-2, 134–139.

Brady, Henry E./Collier, David/Seawright, Jason 2004: Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology, in: Brady, Henry E./Collier, David (Hrsg.): Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham, Md., 3–20.

Buchanan, Allen/Keohane, Robert O. 2006: The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions, in: Ethics & International Affairs 20: 4, 405–437.

Buchstein, Hubertus/Jörke, Dirk 2003: Das Unbehagen an der Demokratietheorie, in: Leviathan 31: 4, 470–495.

Çali, Başak (Hrsg.) 2010: International Law for International Relations, Oxford [UK], New York. Carr, Edward H. 2001: The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939. An Introduction to the Study of Inter-

national Relations. With a New Introduction by Michael Cox, Basingstoke, Hampshire. Cashore, Benjamin 2002: Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–

State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority, in: Govern-ance 15: 4, 503–529.

Chayes, Abram/Chayes, Antonia H. 1993: On Compliance, in: International Organization 47: 2, 175–205.

Chayes, Abram/Chayes, Antonia H. 1995: The New Sovereignty. Compliance With International Reg-ulatory Agreements, Cambridge, Mass.

Cichowski, Rachel A. 2006a: Courts, Rights, and Democratic Participation, in: Comparative Political Studies 39: 1, 50–75.

Cichowski, Rachel A. 2006b: Introduction, in: Comparative Political Studies 39: 1, 3–21. Clark, Ian 2007a: International Legitimacy and World Society, Oxford. Clark, Ian 2007b: Legitimacy in International Society, Oxford. Collier, David/Brady, Henry E./Seawright, Jason 2004a: Critiques, Responses, and Trade-Offs: Draw-

ing Together the Debate, in: Brady, Henry E./Collier, David (Hrsg.): Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham, Md., 195–227.

Collier, David/Brady, Henry E./Seawright, Jason 2004b: Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology, in: Brady, Henry E./Collier, David (Hrsg.): Re-thinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham, Md., 229–266.

Collier, David/Seawright, Jason/Munck, Gerardo L. 2004c: The Quest for Standards: King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry, in: Brady, Henry E./Collier, David (Hrsg.): Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham, Md., 21–50.

Conzelmann, Thomas/Wolf, Klaus Dieter 2007: Doing Good While Doing Well?Potenzial und grenzen grenzüberschreitender privatwirtschaftlicher Selbstregulierung, in: Hasenclever, Andreas/ Wolf,


Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Macht und Ohnmacht internationaler Institutionen. Fest-schrift für Volker Rittberger, Frankfurt am Main, 145–175.

Creighton, Breen 2004: Freedom of Association, in: Blanpain, Roger (Hrsg.): Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Den Haag, Frederick, MD, 233–274.

Creighton, Breen 2005: Book Review. Unfair Advantage: Workers' Freedom of Association in the United States under International Human Rights Standards., in: Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal 26: 2, 327–335.

Cutler, A. Claire/Haufler, Virgina/Porter, Tony 1999a: Private Authority and International Affairs, in: Cutler, A. Claire/Haufler, Virgina/Porter, Tony (Hrsg.): Private Authority and International Af-fairs, Albany, NY, 3–28.

Cutler, A. Claire/Haufler, Virgina/Porter, Tony (Hrsg.) 1999b: Private Authority and International Af-fairs, Albany, NY.

Cutler, A. Claire/Haufler, Virgina/Porter, Tony 1999c: The Contours and Significance of Private Au-thority in International Affairs, in: Cutler, A. Claire/Haufler, Virgina/Porter, Tony (Hrsg.): Pri-vate Authority and International Affairs, Albany, NY, 333–376.

Deitelhoff, Nicole 2007: Was vom Tage übrig blieb. Inseln der Überzeugung im vermachteten Alltags-geschäft internationalen Regierens, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frank-furt am Main, 26–56.

Deitelhoff, Nicole 2009a: Fairness oder Demokratie? Zu den Chancen deliberativer Verfahren im internationalen Regieren, in: Brunkhorst, Hauke (Hrsg.): Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, 303–322.

Deitelhoff, Nicole 2009b: The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case, in: International Organization 63: 1, 33–65.

Deitelhoff, Nicole 2010: Parallele Universen oder Verschmelzung der Horizonte, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 17: 2, 279–292.

Deng, Francis 2007: The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and the Development of Inter-national Norms, in: Biersteker, Thomas J./Spiro, Peter J./Sriram, Chandra L./Raffo, Veronica (Hrsg.): International law and international relations. Bridging theory and practice, London, 141–165.

Dingwerth, Klaus 2003: Globale Politiknetzwerke und ihre demokratische Legitimation. Analyse der World Commission on Dams. (Global Governance Working Paper), Potsdam, Berlin, Oldenburg.

Dingwerth, Klaus 2007: The New Transnationalism. Transnational Governance and Democratic Le-gitimacy (Transformations of the State), Basingstoke, Hampshire.

Dingwerth, Klaus/Blauberger, Michael/Schneider, Christian 2011: Postnationale Demokratie. Eine Einführung am Beispiel von EU, WTO und UNO (Lehrbuch, Band 47), Wiesbaden.


Dingwerth, Klaus/Eichinger, Margot 2010: Tamed Transparency: How Information Disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative Fails to Empower, in: Global Environmental Politics 10: 3, 74–96.

Dirks, Jan 2005: Internationale Willensbildung für ein neues maritimes Übereinkommen der Interna-tionalen Arbeitsorganisation, in: Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva (Hrsg.): Weltweit geltende Arbeits-standards trotz Globalisierung. Analysen, Diagnosen und Einblicke, Münster, 37–48.

Djelic, Marie-Laure/Sahlin-Anderson, Kerstin (Hrsg.) 2006: Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, Cambridge.

Downs, George W./Rocke, David M./Barsoom, Peter N. 1996: Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?, in: International Organization 50: 3, 379–406.

Drouin, Renée-Claude 2010: Promoting Fundamental Labour Rights Through International Frame-work Agreements: Practical Outcomes and Present Challenges, in: Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 31: 3, 591–636.

Dryzek, John S./Stevenson, Hayley 2011: Global Democracy and Earth System Governance, in: Eco-logical Economics 70: 11, 1865–1874.

Duffield, John S. 2003: The Limits of "Rational Design", in: International Organization 57: 2, 411–430.

Dufty, Norman F. 1972: Organizational Growth and Goal Structure: the Case of the ILO, in: Interna-tional Organization 26: 3, 479–498.

Dunning, Harold 1998: The origins of Convention No. 87 on freedom of association and the right to organize, in: International Labour Review 137: 2, 149–168.

Duplessis, Isabelle 2008: Soft International Labour Law: The Preferred Method of Regulation in a Decentralized Society, in: International Institute for Labour Studies (Hrsg.): Governance, Inter-national Law & Corporate Social Responsibility, Genf, 7–36.

Finnemore, Martha 2007: New Directions, New Collaborations for International Law and International Relations, in: Biersteker, Thomas J./Spiro, Peter J./Sriram, Chandra L./Raffo, Veronica (Hrsg.): International law and international relations. Bridging theory and practice, London, 266–277.

Finnemore, Martha J. 2005: National Interests in International Society (1996), in: Koh, Harold H./Hathamay, Oona A. (Hrsg.): Foundations of International Law and Politics, New York, 112–120.

Finnemore, Martha J./Toope, Stephen 2001: Alternatives to "Legalization": Richer Views of Law and Politics, in: International Organization 55: 3, 743–758.

Fischer, Klemens H. 2007: Die Legitimation von supranationalen Organisationen, in: Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 62: 3, 323–370.

Forst, Rainer 2010: Der aufrechte Gang. Jenseits von religiösen oder kulturellen Besonderheiten: Über Sinn, Geschichte und Geltung der Menschenrechte, in: Frankfurter Rundschau, 25.11.2010, 32–33.

Franck, Thomas M. 1990: The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, New York, Oxford. Franck, Thomas M. 1997: Fairness in international law and institutions, Oxford.


Fransen, Luc W./Kolk, Ans 2007: Global Rule-Setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Standards, in: Organization 14: 5, 667–684.

Fraser, Nancy 2007: Die Transnationalisierung der Öffentlichkeit. Legitimität und Effektivität der öf-fentlichen Meinung in einer postwestfälischen Welt, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internati-onalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main, 224–253.

Friedensvertrag von Versailles (1919): zwischen den USA, dem Britischen Reich, Frankreich, Italien, Japan, Belgien, Bolivien, Brasilien, Kuba, Ekuador, Griechenland, Guatemala, Haiti, Hedschas, Honduras, Liberia, Nikaragua, Panama, Peru, Polen, Portugal, Rumänien, dem ser-bisch-kroatisch-slowenischen Staat, Siam, der Tschechoslowakei und Uruguay einerseits und Deutschland anderseits. 28. Juni 1919, in: http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/dokumente/versai-lles/index.html; eingesehen am 27.09.2013.

Fröbel, Folker/Heinrichs, Jürgen/Kreye, Otto 1977: Die neue internationale Arbeitsteilung. Struktu-relle Arbeitsteilung in den Industrieländern und die Industrialisierung der Entwicklungsländer, Reinbek bei Hamburg.

Gaddis, John L. 1998: We now know. Rethinking gold war history (A council on foreign relations book), Oxford.

Geis, Anna/Nullmeier, Frank/Daase, Christopher (Hrsg.) 2012: Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen (Leviathan Sonderband, Band 27), Baden-Baden.

Gernigon, Bernard/Odero, Alberto G. H. 2000: ILO Principles Concerning Collective Bargaining, in: International Labour Review 139: 1, 33–55.

Gernigon, Bernard/Odero, Alberto/Guido, Horacio 2000: Collective bargaining. ILO Standards and the Principles of the Supervisory Bodies, Genf.

Gerring, John 2007: Case study research. Principles and practices, Cambridge. Ghebali, Victor-Yves 1989: The International Labour Organisation. A Case Study on the Evolution of

U.N. Specialised Agencies (International Organization and the Evolution of World Society, Band 3), Dordrecht.

Goldstein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2000: Introduction: Le-galization and World Politics, in: International Organization 54: 3, 385–399.

Goldstein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2001: Introduction: Le-galization and World Politics, in: Goldstein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaugh-ter, Anne-Marie (Hrsg.): Legalization and World Politics, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.], 1–16.

Grant, Ruth W./Keohane, Robert O. 2005: Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, in: American Political Science Review 99: 1, 29–43.

Gravel, Eric/Duplessis, Isabelle/Gernigon, Bernard 2002: The Committee on Freedom of Association. Its impact over 50 years, Genf.


Graz, Jean-Christophe/Nölke, Andreas (Hrsg.) 2008: Transnational Private Governance and its Limits (Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science, Band 51), London.

Greven, Thomas/Scherrer, Christoph 2005: Globalisierung gestalten. Weltökonomie und soziale Stan-dards (Schriftenreihe, Band 440), Bonn.

Grieco, Joseph M. 1990: Cooperation among nations. Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade, Ithaca.

Grieco, Joseph M. 1993: Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism, in: Baldwin, David A. (Hrsg.): Neorealism and Neoliberalism. The Con-temporary Debate, New York, 116–140.

Gupta, Aarti 2010: Transparency in Global Environmental Governance: A Coming of Age?, in: Global Environmental Politics 10: 3, 1–9.

Habermas, Jürgen 1998: Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays (Edition Suhrkamp, Band 2095), Frankfurt am Main.

Habermas, Jürgen 1999: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Frankfurt am Main.

Habermas, Jürgen 2007: Kommunikative Rationalität und grenzüberschreitende Politik: eine Replik, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Ha-bermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main, 406–459.

Hagen, Katherine A. 2003: The International Labour Organization: Can it Deliver the Social Dimen-sion of Globalization? FES: Dialogue on Globalization. Occasional Papers, 11/Oktober., Genf.

Hall, Rodney B./Biersteker, Thomas J. (Hrsg.) 2002: The emergence of private authority in global governance (Cambridge Studies in International Relations), Cambridge.

Hasenclever, Andreas/Mayer, Peter/Rittberger, Volker 1998. Theories of International Regimes, Cam-bridge, Mass.

Haufler, Virginia 2001: A Public Role for the Private Sector. Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy, Washington, DC.

Held, David/Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias 2004: Introduction, in: Government and Opposition 39: 2, 125–131.

Hemmati, Minu 2002: Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability - Beyond Dead-lock and Conflict, London.

Hessler, Siglinde 2012: Arbeitnehmerrechte weltweit stärken? Die Umsetzung der Internationalen Rahmenvereinbarungen in Mexiko (Arbeit - Interessen - Partizipation, Band 10), Frankfurt am Main.

Honke, Jana/Kranz, Nicole/Börzel, Tanja A./Héritier, Adrienne 2008: Fostering Environmental Regu-lation? Corporate Social Responsibility in Countries With Weak Regulatory Capacities. The Case of South Africa (SFB-Governance working paper series), Berlin.

Hughes, Steve/Haworth, Nigel 2011: The International Labour Organization (ILO). Coming in from the cold (Global Institutions, Band 45), London.


Human Rights Watch (19.11.2012): Civil Society Denounces Adoption of Flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, in: http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/11/19/civil-society-denounces-adoption-flawed-asean-human-rights-declaration; eingesehen am 11.11.2012.

Hurd, Ian 1999: Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics, in: International Organization 53: 02, 379–408.

Hurrell, Andrew 2005: Legitimacy and the Use of Force: Can the Circle be Squared?, in: Review of International Studies 31: S1, 15.

Hurrelmann, Achim/Schneider, Steffen/Steffek, Jens 2007a: Conclusion: Legitimacy - Making Sense of an Essentialy Contested Concept, in: Hurrelmann, Achim/Schneider, Steffen/Steffek, Jens (Hrsg.): Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, Basingstoke, Hampshire [u.a.], 229–237.

Hurrelmann, Achim/Schneider, Steffen/Steffek, Jens 2007b: Introduction: Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, in: Hurrelmann, Achim/Schneider, Steffen/Steffek, Jens (Hrsg.): Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, Basingstoke, Hampshire [u.a.], 1–16.

IFTU 1919: Trade Union Congress, 05.-09.02.1919. Declaration of the IFTU expressing a protest against the clauses of the "Charter of Labour" as contained in the Versailles Peace Treaty. IFTU Archives. International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam.

ITUC (2012a): 2012 Annual Survey of Violations of Trade Union Rights - Canada, in: http://www.un-hcr.org/refworld/publisher,ITUC,ANNUALREPORT,CAN,4fd8895cc,0.html; eingesehen am 11.02.2012.

ITUC (2012b): 2012 Annual Survey of Violations of Trade Union Rights - Iraq, in: http://www.un-hcr.org/refworld/publisher,ITUC,,IRQ,4fd88946c,0.html; eingesehen am 11.02.2012.

ITUC (2012c): 2012 Annual Survey of Violations of Trade Union Rights - New Zealand, in: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/publisher,ITUC,ANNUALREPORT,NZL,4fd8893229,0.html; eingesehen am 11.02.2012.

Jakobeit, Cord/Kappel, Robert/Mückenberger, Ulrich 2010: Zivilisierung der Weltordnung, in: Levi-athan 38: 3, 411–427.

Jenks, Clarence W. 1934: The origins of the International Labour Organization, in: International La-bour Review 30: 5, 575–581.

Joerges, Christian/Sand, Inger-Johanne/Teubner, Gunther (Hrsg.) 2004: Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, Oxford.

Jörke, Dirk/Take, Ingo 2011: Vom demokratischen zum legitimen Regieren?, in: Politische Vierteljah-resschrift 52: 2, 286–305.

Kahler, Miles 1995: International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration, Washington, DC.

Kahler, Miles 2001: Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization, in: Goldstein, Judith L./Kahler, Miles/Keohane, Robert O./Slaughter, Anne-Marie (Hrsg.): Legalization and World Politics, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.], 277–299.

Kahler, Miles 2004: Defining Accountability Up: the Global Economic Multilaterals, in: Government and Opposition 39: 2, 132–158.


Keohane, Robert O. 2003: Global Governance and Democratic Accountability, in: Held, David/Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (Hrsg.): Taming globalization. Frontiers of governance, Cam-bridge, 130–159.

Keohane, Robert O./Nye, Joseph S. 2003: Redefinig Accountability for Global Governance, in: Kahler, Miles/Lake, David A. (Hrsg.): Governance in a global economy. Political authority in transition, Princeton, NJ; Oxford, 386–411.

King, Gary/Keohane, Robert O./Verba, Sidney 1994: Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, N.J.

Kingsbury, Benedict 1998: The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law, in: Michigan Journal of International Law 19: 2, 345–372.

Kirton, John J./Trebilcock, Michael J. (Hrsg.) 2004a: Hard Choices, Soft Law. Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment, and Social Governance (Global environmental governance series), Aldershot.

Kirton, John J./Trebilcock, Michael J. 2004b: Introduction: Hard Choices and Soft Law in Sustainable Global Governance, in: Kirton, John J./Trebilcock, Michael J. (Hrsg.): Hard Choices, Soft Law. Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment, and Social Governance, Aldershot, 3–29.

Klabbers, Jan 2006: The Meaning of Rules, in: International Relations 20: 3, 295–301. Klotz, Audie 2002: Transnational Activism and Global Transformations: The Anti-Apartheid and Abo-

litionist Experiences, in: European Journal of International Relations 8: 1, 49–76. Knothe, Danko 2009: Legitimität durch Flexibilität: Zur Governanceleistung des WTO- Streitbei-

legungsmechanismus in Handelskonflikten, in: Take, Ingo (Hrsg.): Legitimes Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates: Unterschiedliche Formen von Global Governance im Vergleich, Baden-Ba-den, 220–240.

Koh, Harold H. 1997: Review: Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, in: The Yale Law Journal 106: 8, 2599–2659.

Kolk, Ans/van Tulder, Rob 2002: Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of Interna-tional Business and Stakeholder Codes, in: Journal of Business Ethics 36: 3, 291–301.

Koremenos, Barbara 2005: Contracting around International Uncertainty, in: The American Political Science Review 99: 4, 549–565.

Koremenos, Barbara 2007: If Only Half of International Agreements Have Dispute Resolution Provi-sions, Which Half Needs Explaining?, in: Journal of Legal Studies 36: 1, 189–212.

Koremenos, Barbara/Lipson, Charles/Snidal, Duncan 2001a: Rational Design: Looking Back to Move Forward, in: International Organization 55: 04, 1051–1082.

Koremenos, Barbara/Lipson, Charles/Snidal, Duncan 2001b: The Rational Design of International In-stitutions, in: International Organization 55: 04, 761–799.

Krasner, Stephen D. 1983: Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Var-iables, in: Krasner, Stephen D. (Hrsg.): International Regimes, Ithaca, 1–21.

Kratochwil, Friedrich 1984: The Force of Prescriptions, in: International Organization 38: 4, 685–708.


Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989: Rules, norms, and decisions. On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs (Cambridge Studies in International Re-lations, Band 2), Cambridge.

Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 2000: How Do Norms Matter?, in: Byers, Michael (Hrsg.): The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law, Oxford, 35–68.

Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 2006: On Legitimacy, in: International Relations 20: 3, 302–308. Krumm, Thomas/Noetzel, Thomas/Westle, Bettina 2009: Ausgewählte wissenschaftstheoretische

Grundlagen und Grundfrgen, in: Westle, Bettina (Hrsg.): Methoden der Politikwissenschaft, Ba-den-Baden, 49–114.

Krumm, Thomas/Westle, Bettina 2009: Der Forschungsprozess im Überblick, in: Westle, Bettina (Hrsg.): Methoden der Politikwissenschaft, Baden-Baden, 115–124.

Kucik, Jeffrey/Reinhardt, Eric 2008: Does Flexibility Promote Cooperation? An Application to the Global Trade Regime, in: International Organization 62: 3, 477–505.

Kuckartz, Udo 2006: Computergestützte qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, in: Behnke, Joachim/Gschwend, Thomas/Schindler, Delia/Schnapp, Kai-Uwe (Hrsg.): Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. Neuere qualitative und quantitative Analyseverfahren, Baden-Baden, 81–91.

Lafont, Cristina 2010: Accountability and global governance: challenging the state-centric conception of human rights, in: Ethics & Global Politics 3: 3, 193–215.

Lang, Anthony/Rengger, Nicholas/Walker, William 2006: The Role(s) of Rules: Some Conceptual Clarifications, in: International Relations 20: 3, 274–294.

Langille, Brian A. 2005: Core Labour Rights - The True Story (Reply to Alston), in: European Journal of International Law 16: 3, 409–437.

Langlois, Anthony J. 2009: Normative and Theoretical Foundations of Human Rights, in: Goodhart, Michael E. (Hrsg.): Human rights. Politics and practice, Oxford, New York, 12–25.

Leary, Virginia A. 1997: The WTO and the Social Clause: Post-Singapore, in: European Journal of International Law 8: 1, 118–122.

Legro, Jeffrey W. 1997: Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the "Failure" of Internationalism, in: Inter-national Organization 51: 1, 31–63.

Levy, Marc A. 1993: European Acid Rain: The Power of Tote-Board Diplomacy, in: Haas, Peter M./Keohane, Robert O./Levy, Marc A. (Hrsg.): Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, Mass., 75–132.

Liese, Andrea 2005: "Capacity Building" als Strategie zur Förderung der Regeleinhaltung. Erfahrungen bei der Abschaffung von Kinderarbeit, in: Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva (Hrsg.): Weltweit geltende Arbeitsstandards trotz Globalisierung. Analysen, Diagnosen und Einblicke, Münster, 63–79.

Liese, Andrea 2009: Exceptional Necessity. How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Tor-ture and Ill-Treatment when Countering Terrorism, in: Journal of International Law and Interna-tional Relations 5: 1, 17–47.


List, Martin/Zangl, Bernhard 2003: Verrechtlichung internationaler Politik, in: Hellmann, Gunther/ Wolf, Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Die neuen internationalen Beziehungen. For-schungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, Baden-Baden, 361–399.

Mahaim, Ernest 1934: The Historical and Social Importance of International Labor Legislation, in: Shotwell, James T. (Hrsg.): The Origins of the International Labour Organization. Volume 1, New York, 3–18.

Mahoney, James 2007: Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics, in: Comparative Political Studies 40: 2, 122–144.

Martin, Lisa L./Simmons, Beth A. 1998: Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions, in: International Organization 52: 4, 729–757.

Maul, Daniel 2007: Menschenrechte, Sozialpolitik und Dekolonisation. Die Internationale Arbeits- organisation (IAO) 1940-1970, Essen.

Maupain, Francis 2003: International Labor Organization. Recommendations and Similar Instruments, in: Shelton, Dinah (Hrsg.): Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System, Oxford, 372–393.

Maupain, Francis 2005: Revitalization Not Retreat: The Real Potential of the 1998 ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers' Rights, in: European Journal of International Law 16: 3, 439–465.

Maupain, Francis 2009: New Foundation or New Facade? The ILO and the 2008 Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, in: European Journal of International Law 20: 3, 823–852.

Mayer, Arno J. 1964: Wilson vs. Lenin. Political Origins of the New Diplomacy: 1917-1918 (Meridian books, Band 175), Cleveland, New York.

Mayntz, Renate 2010: Legitimacy and Compliance in Transnational Governance (MPIfG Working Paper), Köln.

Mayring, Philipp 2002: Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken, Weinheim.

Mearsheimer, John J. 1994/95: The False Promise of International Instutions, in: International Security 19: 3, 5–49.

Meuser, Michael/Nagel, Ulrike 2009: Das Experteninterview — konzeptionelle Grundlagen und me-thodische Anlage, in: Pickel, Susanne/Pickel, Gert/Lauth, Hans-Joachim/Jahn, Detlef (Hrsg.): Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft. Neue Entwicklungen und Anwen-dungen, Wiesbaden, 465–479.

Milner, Helen/Rosendorff, Peter 2001: The Optimal Design of International Institutions: Why Escape Clauses are Essential, in: International Organization 55: 4, 829–857.

Mitchell, Ronald B. 1998: Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes, in: International Studies Quarterly 42: 1, 109–130.

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1960: Politics among nations. The struggle for power and peace, New York. Morrow, James D. 2001: The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties, in: International

Organization 55: 4, 971–991.


Morse, David A. 1969: The Origin and Evolution of the I.L.O. and its Role in the World Community (The Frank W. Pierce Memorial Lectures At Cornell University, October 1968), Ithaca; New York.

Müller, Harald 2004: Arguing, Bargaining and all That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations, in: European Journal of International Relations 10: 3, 395–435.

Nanz, Patrizia/Steffek, Jens 2004: Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere, in: Gov-ernment and Opposition 39: 2, 314–335.

Nanz, Patrizia/Steffek, Jens 2005: Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation in International Governance: Criteria and Research Strategies, in: Acta Politica 40: 3, 368–383.

Nanz, Patrizia/Steffek, Jens 2007: Zivilgesellschaftliche Partizipation und die Demokratisierung internationalen Regierens, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommu-nikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main, 87–110.

Neubauer, Gerald 2005: Judizialisierung und Effektivität quasi-gerichtlicher Streitverfahren in der ILO. Eine empirische Untersuchung zu Streitfällen um die Vereinigungsfreiheit in den USA, in: Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva (Hrsg.): Weltweit geltende Arbeitsstandards trotz Globalisierung. Ana-lysen, Diagnosen und Einblicke, Münster, 125–153.

Neubauer, Gerald 2009: Judizialisierungsprozesse im Arbeitsschutzbereich: Vom Vorreiter zum Nachzügler - die ILO, in: Zangl, Bernhard (Hrsg.): Auf dem Weg zu internationaler Rechtsherr-schaft? Streitbeilegung zwischen Politik und Recht, Frankfurt am Main, 191–227.

Neyer, Jürgen/Wolf, Klaus Dieter 2005: The Analysis of Compliance with International Rules: Defi-nitions, Variables, and Methodology, in: Zürn, Michael/Joerges, Christian (Hrsg.): Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Compliance Beyond the Nation-State, Cambridge, 40–64.

Nußberger, Angelika 2005: Sozialstandards im Völkerrecht. Eine Studie zu Entwicklung und Bedeu-tung der Normsetzung der Vereinten Nationen, der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation und des Europarats zu Fragen des Sozialschutzes (Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Band 161), Berlin.

Nußberger, Angelika 2007: Evaluating the ILO’s Approach to Standard-Setting and Monitoring in the Field of Social Security, in: Riedel, Eibe (Hrsg.): Social Security as a Human Right. Drafting a General Comment on Article 9 ICESCR - Some Challenges, Berlin, Heidelberg, 103–115.

Oatley, Thomas H. 2001: Multilateralizing Trade and Payments in Postwar Europe, in: International Organization 55: 4, 949–969.

Onuf, Nicholas G. 2008: The Constitution of International Society (1993), in: Onuf, Nicholas G. (Hrsg.): International Legal Theory. Essays and engagements, 1966-2006, London, 295–314.

Papadopoulos, Yannis 2004: Governance und Demokratie, in: Benz, Arthur (Hrsg.): Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. Eine Einführung, Wiesbaden, 215–237.

Pattberg, Philipp 2007: Private Institutions and Global Governance. The New Politics of Environmen-tal Sustainability, Cheltenham.


Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2011: How States Ration Flexibility: Tariffs, Remedies, and Exchange Rates as Pol-icy Substitutes, in: World Politics 63: 4, 618–646.

Politakis, George P. 2004: Deconstructing Flexibility in International Labour Conventions, in: Javillier, Jean-Claude/Gernigon, Bernard/Politakis, George P. (Hrsg.): Les normes internation-ales du travail. Un patrimoine pour l'avenir: mélanges en l'honneur de Nicolas Valticos, Genf, 463–496.

Raustiala, Kal 2005: Form and Substance in International Agreements, in: The American Journal of International Law 99: 3, 581–614.

Raustiala, Kal/Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2005: International Law, International Relations and Compli-ance, in: Carlsnaes, Walter/Risse, Thomas/Simmons, Beth A. (Hrsg.): Handbook of International Relations, London, 538–558.

Reinicke, Wolfgang H. 1998: Global Public Policy. Governing Without Government?, Washington, DC.

Reinicke, Wolfgang H./Deng, Francis (Hrsg.) 2000: Critical Choices. The United Nations, Networks, and the Future of Global Governance, Ottawa.

Risse, Thomas 2003: Konstruktivismus, Rationalismus und Theorien Internationaler Beziehungen - warum empirisch nichts so heiß gegessen wird, wie es theoretisch gekocht wurde, in: Hellmann, Gunther/Wolf, Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Die neuen internationalen Beziehungen. For-schungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, Baden-Baden, 99–133.

Risse, Thomas 2006: Transnational Governance and Legitimacy, in: Benz, Arthur/Papadopoulos, Yan-nis (Hrsg.): Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and International Ex-periences, London, 179–199.

Risse, Thomas/Ropp, Steve C. 2000: International Human Rights Norms and Domsetic Change: Comclusions, in: Risse, Thomas/Ropp, Steve C./Sikkink, Kathryn (Hrsg.): The power of human rights. International norms and domestic change, New York, NY, 234–278.

Rodgers, Gerry 2008: The Goal of Decent Work, in: IDS Bulletin 39: 2, 63–68. Rosenau, James N. 1990: Turbulence in World Politics. A Theory of Change and Continuity,

Princeton, NJ. Rosenau, James N. 2000: Governance in a Globalizing World, in: Held, David (Hrsg.): The Global

Transformations Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, Cambridge, 181–190. Ross, Rober J. S./Chan, Anita 2002: From North-South to South-South. The True Face of Global Com-

petition, in: Foreign Affairs 81: September/October, 8–13. Roy, Chandra/Kaye, Mike 2002: The International Labour Organization: A Handbook for Minorities

and Indigenous Peoples, London. Ruggie, John G. 1998a: What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social

Constructivist Challenge, in: Ruggie, John G. (Hrsg.): Constructing the world polity. Essays on international institutionalization, London, 1–40.

Ruggie, John G. 1998b: What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge, in: International Organization 52: 4, 855–885.


Rynhart, Gary 2004: International Employers' Organizations, in: Blanpain, Roger (Hrsg.): Compara-tive Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Den Haag, Fred-erick, MD, 55–73.

Samson, Klaus/Schindler, Kenneth 2002: The Standard-Setting and Supervisory System of the Inter-national Labour Organisation, in: Hanski, Raija/Suksi, Markku (Hrsg.): An Introduction to the International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook, Turkuu. a., 185–218.

Schaal, Gary S./Ritzi, Claudia (2009): Empirische Deliberationsforschung, in: www.mpifg.de/pu/- workpap/wp09-9.pdf; eingesehen am 01.11.2011.

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999: Regieren in Europa. Effektiv und demokratisch?, Frankfurt. Schimmelfennig, Frank 1997: Rhetorisches Handeln in der internationalen Politik, in: Zeitschrift für

Internationale Beziehungen 4: 2, 219–254. Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer 2007: An den Grenzen der Entstaatlichung. Bemerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas'

Modell einer 'Weltinnenpolitik ohne Weltregierung', in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internati-onalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main.

Schmidt, Hilmar/Take, Ingo 1997: More Democratic and better? The Contribution of NGOs to the Democratization The Contribution of NGOs to the Democratization of International Politics and the Solution of Global Problems (World Society Research Group Working Paper), Darmstadt.

Schönhoven, Klaus 1987: Die Gewerkschaften als Massenbewegung im Wilhelminischen Kaiserreich 1890 bis 1918, in: Borsdorf, Ulrich (Hrsg.): Geschichte der deutschen Gewerkschaften von den Anfängen bis 1945, Köln, 167–278.

Scholte, Jan Aart 2004: Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance, in: Gov-ernment and Opposition 39: 2, 211–233.

Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva 2005a: Geltungs und Wirksamkeit internationaler Regulierungen durch die Internationale Arbeitsorganistion (ILO) in der Zeiten der Globalisierung - Eckpunkte und Dis-kussionslinien, in: Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva (Hrsg.): Weltweit geltende Arbeitsstandards trotz Globalisierung. Analysen, Diagnosen und Einblicke, Münster, 5–33.

Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva 2005b: The ILO – Experience with Tripartism in the Governance Field of Labour Regulation (CIS-Papers), Hamburg.

Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva 2010: Internationale Arbeitsregulierung für ein menschenwürdiges Leben weltweit, in: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: 34-35, 27–33.

Servais, Jean-Michel 1986: Flexibility and Rigidity in International Labour Standards, in: International Labour Review 125: 2, 193–208.

Shaw, Jo 1998: The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges of Flexibility and Legitimacy, in: European Law Journal 4: 1, 63–86.

Shelton, Dinah 2003: Introduction. Law, Non-Law and the Problem of Soft Law, in: Shelton, Dinah (Hrsg.): Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Le-gal System, Oxford, 1–18.


Shotwell, James T. (Hrsg.) 1934a: The Origins of the International Labour Organisation. Volume 2, New York.

Shotwell, James T. (Hrsg.) 1934b: The Origins of the International Labour Organization. Volume 1, New York.

Simmons, Beth A./Martin, Lisa L. 2005: International Organizations and Institutions, in: Carlsnaes, Walter/Risse, Thomas/Simmons, Beth A. (Hrsg.): Handbook of International Relations, London, 192–211.

Stafford, Brigid 1952/1953: The International Labour Organisation - its origins and story, in: Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland XXIX: Part I, 109–126.

Standing, Guy 2008: The ILO: An Agency for Globalization?, in: Development and Change 39: 3, 355–384.

Stasavage, David 2004: Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bar-gaining, in: International Organization 58: 4, 667–703.

Steffek, Jens/Nanz, Patrizia 2008: Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and Eu-ropean Governance, in: Kissling, Claudia/Nanz, Patrizia/Steffek, Jens (Hrsg.): Civil Society Par-ticipation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit?, Basingstoke, Hampshire [u.a.], 1–29.

Strange, Susan 1983: Cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis, in: Krasner, Stephen D. (Hrsg.): International Regimes, Ithaca, 337–354.

Stübig, Steffen 2010: Legitimität und Flexibilität. Eine Fallstudie zur Internationalen Arbeitsorganisa-tion. (Konferenzpapier, Tagung der Nachwuchsgruppe der Sektion Internationale Politik der DVPW, 28.-30. Mai 2010), Schmitten.

Suchman, Mark C. 1995: Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, in: The Acad-emy of Management Review 20: 3, 571–610.

Sweet, Alec S. 1999: Judicialization and the Construction of Governance, in: Comparative Political Studies 32: 2, 147–184.

Swepston, Lee 1998: Human rights law and freedom of association: Development through ILO super-vision, in: International Labour Review 137: 2, 169–194.

Swepston, Lee 2004: International Labour Law, in: Blanpain, Roger (Hrsg.): Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Den Haag, Frederick, MD, 141–163.

Tajgman, David/Curtis, Karen 2000: Freedom of Association: A User's Guide. Standards, Principles and Procedures of the International Labour Organizatio, Genf.

Take, Ingo 2002: NGOs im Wandel. Von der Graswurzel auf das diplomatische Parkett, Wiesbaden. Take, Ingo 2009: Legitimes Regieren auf drei Ebenen - Konzeption und Analyseraster, in: Take, Ingo

(Hrsg.): Legitimes Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates: Unterschiedliche Formen von Global Governance im Vergleich, Baden-Baden, 9–25.

Take, Ingo 2011: Legitimes Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates im Vergleich. Die globalen Bemü-hungen zur Beseitigung der Kinderarbeit, in: Zeitschrift für Politik 58: 2, 170–187.


Take, Ingo 2013: Globales Regieren auf dem Prüfstand. Nicht demokratisch aber legitim? (Schriften zur Governance-Forschung, Band 26), Baden-Baden.

Tallberg, Jonas 2002: Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union, in: International Organization 56: 3, 609–643.

Thomann, Lars 2011: Steps to Compliance With International Labour Standards. The International Labour Organization (ILO) and the Abolition of Forced Labour, Wiesbaden.

Thomas, Albert 1921: The International Labour Organisation. Its Origins, Development and Future, in: International Labour Review 1: 1, 5–22.

Thompson, Alexander 2010: Rational design in motion: Uncertainty and flexibility in the global climate regime, in: European Journal of International Relations 16: 2, 269–296.

Thompson, Dennis F. 2008: Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science, in: Annual Review of Political Science 11: 1, 497–520.

Tosstorff, Reiner 2005a: Moskau oder Amsterdam? Die Rote Gewerkschaftsinternationale 1920 bis 1937, in: UTOPIE kreativ: 177/178, 704–718.

Tosstorff, Reiner 2005b: The International Trade-Union Movement and the Founding of the Interna-tional Labour Organization, in: International Review of Social History 50: 3, 399–433.

UN 1969: Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Done at Vienna on 23 May 1969. Entered into force on 27 January 1980. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, S. 331, Genf.

UN 1995: Report of the World Summit for Social Development, Copenhagen 6-12 March 1995. A/Conf/.166/9, Genf.

UN 2004a: Allgemeine Erklärung der Menschenrechte, in: Tomuschat, Christian (Hrsg.): Völkerrecht, Baden-Baden, (Kapitel 10).

UN 2004b: Internationaler Pakt über bürgerliche und politische Rechte, in: Tomuschat, Christian (Hrsg.): Völkerrecht, Baden-Baden, (Kapitel 15).

UN 2004c: Internationaler Pakt über wirtschaftliche, soziale und kulturelle Rechte, in: Tomuschat, Christian (Hrsg.): Völkerrecht, Baden-Baden, (Kapitel 16).

UN 2004d: Internationales Übereinkommen zur Beseitigung jeder Form der Rassendiskriminierung, in: Tomuschat, Christian (Hrsg.): Völkerrecht, Baden-Baden, (Kapitel 14).

UN 2005: Charter of the United Nations and Statue of the International Court of Justice, Genf. UN News Centre (19.11.2012): UN official welcomes ASEAN commitment to human rights, but con-

cerned over declaration wording, in: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=43536#.- UoDpUeL3Nv6; eingesehen am 11.11.2013.

US Department of State (20.11.2012): Press Statement. ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights, in: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/11/200915.htm; eingesehen am 11.11.2013.

Valticos, Nicolas 1996: Fifty Years of Standard-Setting Activities by the International Labour Organ-ization, in: International Labour Review 100: 3, 201–237.

Valticos, Nicolas 1998: International Labour Standards and Human Rights. Approaching the Year 2000, in: International Labour Review 137: 2, 135–147.


van Goethem, Geert 2006: The Amsterdam International. The World of the International Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU), 1913 - 1945 (Studies in labour history), Aldershot [u.a.].

Wagner, Dieter 1975: Die Gewerkschaften in Portugal, in: Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte 26: 8, 487–496.

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979: Theory of international politics, Boston. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986: Anarchic Orders and Balance of Power, in: Keohane, Robert O. (Hrsg.):

Neorealism and Its Critics, New York, 98–130. Wendt, Alexander 2001: Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional

Design, in: International Organization 55: 04, 1019–1049. Westle, Bettina/Krumm, Thomas 2009: Ausgewählte Verfahren der Datenerhebung, in: Westle,

Bettina (Hrsg.): Methoden der Politikwissenschaft, Baden-Baden, 207–271. Wiener, Antje 2003: Die Wende zum Dialog: Konstruktivistische Brückenstationen und ihre Zukunft,

in: Hellmann, Gunther/Wolf, Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Die neuen internationalen Be-ziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, Baden-Baden, 133–159.

Wiener, Antje 2004: Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Poli-tics, in: European Journal of International Relations 10: 2, 189–234.

Wiener, Antje 2007a: Contested Meanings of Norms: A Research Framework, in: Comparative Euro-pean Politics 5: 1, 1–17.

Wiener, Antje 2007b: The Dual Quality of Norms and Governance beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to 'Interaction', in: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10: 1, 47–69.

Wild, Florian 1992: Flexibilität in multilateralen Instrumenten. Eine völkerrechtliche Untersuchung anhand der Rechtsetzung der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation unter Berücksichtigung der Vergleichbarkeit der Ergebnisse für die multilaterale Rechtsetzung anderer internationaler Organisationen, Frankfurt am Main.

Wilson, Woodrow 1917: Address to Congress, 02.04.1917. Making the World “Safe for Democracy”, Washington, DC.

Wilson, Woodrow 1918: Address to Congress, 08.01.1918. President Wilson's Fourteen Points, Wash-ington, DC.

Windmuller, John/Pursey, Stephen/Baker, Jim 2004: The International Trade Union Movement, in: Blanpain, Roger (Hrsg.): Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Den Haag, Frederick, MD, 75–102.

Wisskirchen, Alfred 2005: The standard-setting and monitoring activity of the ILO: Legal questions and practical experience, in: International Labour Review 144: 3, 253–289.

Wolf, Klaus Dieter 1993: Internationale Verrechtlichung (Jahresschrift für Rechtspolitologie), Pfaffen-weiler.

Wolf, Klaus Dieter 2000a: Die neue Staatsräson. Zwischenstaatliche Kooperation als Demokratieprob-lem in der Weltgesellschaft. Plädoyer für eine geordnete Entstaatlichung des Regierens jenseits des Staates (Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert, Band 3), Baden-Baden.


Wolf, Klaus Dieter 2000b: The new Raison d’État: International Cooperation Against Society, in: Albert, Mathias/Brock, Lothar/Wolf, Klaus Dieter (Hrsg.): Civilizing World Politics. Society and Community Beyond the State, Lanham, Md., 119–132.

Wolf, Klaus Dieter 2006: Private Actors and the Legitimacy of Governance beyond the State. Concep-tual Outlines and Empirical Explanations, in: Benz, Arthur/Papadopoulos, Yannis (Hrsg.): Gov-ernance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and International Experiences, London, 200–227.

Woods, Ngaire 2003: Holding Intergovernmental Institutions to Account, in: Ethics & International Affairs 17: 1, 69–80.

World of Work 2009: From the right to "combine" to the right to organize (August, No. 66), Genf. Yarbrough, Beth V./Yarbrough, Robert M. 1987: Cooperation in the liberalization of international

trade: after hegemony, what?, in: International Organization 41: 1, 1–26. Zangl, Bernhard 2007: Verrechtlichung - Die Bedeutung internationaler Streitbeilegungsinstanzen, in:

Hasenclever, Andreas/Wolf, Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Macht und Ohnmacht interna-tionaler Institutionen. Festschrift für Volker Rittberger, Frankfurt am Main, 176–203.

Zangl, Bernhard (Hrsg.) 2009: Auf dem Weg zu internationaler Rechtsherrschaft? Streitbeilegung zwi-schen Politik und Recht (Staatlichkeit im Wandel), Frankfurt am Main.

Zangl, Bernhard/Zürn, Michael 2003: Frieden und Krieg. Sicherheit in der nationalen und postnatio-nalen Konstellation (Edition Suhrkamp Neue Sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliothek, Band 2337), Frankfurt am Main.

Zangl, Bernhard/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.) 2004: Verrechtlichung - Baustein für Global Governance? (Eine Welt, Band 18), Bonn.

Zürn, Michael 2004: Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems, in: Government and Opposition 39: 2, 260–287.

Zürn, Michael 2005a: From Interdependence to Globalization, in: Carlsnaes, Walter/Risse, Thomas/Simmons, Beth A. (Hrsg.): Handbook of International Relations, London, 235–254.

Zürn, Michael 2005b: Introduction: Law and Compliance at Different Levels, in: Zürn, Michael/ Joerges, Christian (Hrsg.): Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Compliance Beyond the Nation-State, Cambridge, 1–39.

Zürn, Michael 2005c: Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance (Edition zweite Moderne), Frankfurt am Main.

Zürn, Michael 2010: Internationale Institutionen und nichtstaatliche Akteure in der Global Gover-nance, in: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: 34-35, 14–20.

Zürn, Michael/Binder, Martin/Ecker-Ehrhardt, Mathias/Radtke, Katrin 2007: Politische Ordnungsbil-dung wider Willen, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 14: 1, 129–164.

Zürn, Michael/Joerges, Christian (Hrsg.) 2005: Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Compli-ance Beyond the Nation-State, Cambridge.


Primärquellen aus der ILO ILO 1927: ILC. Tenth Session. Record of Proceedings, Genf. ILO 1947a: Governing Body. Minutes of the 102nd Session. 13 June - 10 July 1947, Genf. ILO 1947b: Governing Body. Minutes of the 103rd Session, 12.-15. December, Genf. ILO 1947c: ILC. Thirtieth Session. Report VII. Freedom Association and Industrial Relations. Seventh

Item on the Agenda, Genf. ILO 1948a: Governing Body. Minutes of the 104th Session. 15.-20 March, Genf. ILO 1948b: ILC. Thirtieth Session. Record of Proceedings, Genf. ILO 1948c: ILC. Thirty-First Session. Record of Proceedings, San Francisco. ILO 1948d: ILC. Thirty-First Session. Report VII (Appendix). Freedom of Association and Protection

of the Right to Organise., San Francisco. ILO 1948e: ILC. Thirty-First Session. Report VII. Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right

to Organise., San Francisco. ILO 1948f: ILC. Thirty-First Session. Report VIII(1). Industrial Relations, San Francisco. ILO 1948g: ILC. Thirty-First Session. Report VIII(2). Industrial Relations, San Francisco. ILO 1949a: ILC. Thirty-Second Session. Record of Proceedings, Genf. ILO 1949b: ILC. Thirty-Second Session. Report IV (1). Application of the Principles of the Right to

Organise and to Bargain Collectively. Fourth Item in the Agenda, Genf. ILO 1949c: ILC. Thirty-Second Session. Report IV (2). Application of the Principles of the Right to

Organise and to Bargain Collectively. Fourth Item in the Agenda, Genf. ILO 1964: Official Bulletin. Vol XLVII. No. 3. Supplemet I. July, Genf. ILO 1975: Official Bulletin. Volume LVIII. Series A. Additional Texts and Decisions. Declaration on

Equality of Opportunity and Treatment for Women Workers, Genf. ILO 1982: Governing Body. Minutes of the 221st Session, Genf. ILO 1984: ILC. Seventieth Session. Record of Proceedings, Genf. ILO 1989: Governing Body. Committee on Standing Orders. Third Item on the Agenda. Follow-up to

the Report of the Governing Body Working party on International Labour Standards. (Doc. GB.244/SC3/3 (November 1989)). Appendix. Flexibility in ILO Standards, Genf.

ILO 1992: Governing Body. 253rd Session.Report of the Fact-Finding and Conciliation Commission on Freedom of Association concerning the Republic of South Africa. 15th Item on the Agenda. Report of the Director General. First Supplementary Report, Genf.

ILO 1994a: Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommenda-tions. ILC 81st Session. Report III (Part 4B). Freedom of association and collective bargaining, Genf.

ILO 1994b: Report of the Director General (Part I): Defending Values, Promoting Change. Social Jus-tice in a Global Economy: An ILO Agenda. International Labour Conference. 81. Session, Genf.


ILO 1996: Freedom of association. Digest of decisions and principles of the Freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO, Genf.

ILO 1997: Report of the Director General: The ILO, Standard Setting and Globalization. International Labour Conference. 85th Session, Genf.

ILO 1998a: ILC. Eighty-sixth Session. Record of Proceedings. Vol. 1, Genf. ILO 1998b: Official Bulletin. Volume LXXXI. Series A, Genf. ILO 1998c: Official Bulletin. Volume LXXXI. Series B. Special Supplement. Forced Labour in

Myanmar (Burma), Genf. ILO 1999: Report of the Director General: Decent work. International Labour Conference 87th Session

1999, Genf. ILO 2000a: ILC. Eighty-eighth Session. Record of Proceedings. Vol. 1, Genf. ILO 2000b: ILC. Eighty-eighth Session. Record of Proceedings. Vol. 2, Genf. ILO 2000c: Your voice at work. Global report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on funda-

mental principles and rights at work, Genf. ILO 2001a: Governing Body. 282nd Session. Eighth Item on the Agenda. Reports of the Committee

on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards. Second Report: International Labour Stand-ards and Human Rights, Genf.

ILO 2001b: Introductory note and Standing Orders of the Governing Body. Annex I-VIII, Genf. ILO 2002a: Governing Body. 285th Session. Eleventh Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee

on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards. Second Report: International Labour Stand-ards and Human Rights, Genf.

ILO 2002b: Working Party on Policy regarding the revision of standards (Cartier Working Party). Fol-low-up decisions by the Governing Body Information note on the progress of work and decisions taken concerning the revision of standards, Genf.

ILO 2003: Governing Body. 288th Session. Tenth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, Genf.

ILO 2004a: Constitution of the International Labour Organisation and Standing Orders of the Interna-tional Labour Conference, Genf.

ILO 2004b: Governing Body. 291st Session. Ninth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, Genf.

ILO 2004c: ILC. 92nd Session. Report 1(B). Organizing for Social Justice. Global Report under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Genf.

ILO 2004d: Report of the Director General on the World Commission on the Social Dimensions of Globalisation. A Fair Globalisation. The Role of the ILO. International Labour Conference 92nd Session, Genf.

ILO 2005: Governing Body. 294th Session. Ninth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, Genf.

ILO 2006a: Annex I: Special procedures for the examination in the International Labour Organization of complaints alleging violations of freedom of association, Genf.


ILO 2006b: Freedom of association. Digest of decisions and principles of the Freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO, Genf.

ILO 2006c: Governing Body. 297th Session. Twelfth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, Genf.

ILO 2006d: Handbook of Procedures Relating to International Labour Conventions and Recommen-dations, Genf.

ILO 2006e: Manual for drafting ILO instruments, Genf. ILO 2007a: Governing Body. 300th Session. Thirteenth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee

on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, Genf. ILO 2007b: Manual for Drafting ILO Instruments. The Quick Guide, Genf. ILO 2007c: The ILO at a glance, Genf. ILO 2007d: Thirteenth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee on Legal Issues and International

Labour Standards. GB.300/13 (Rev.). 300th Session, November, Genf. ILO 2008a: Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, Genf. ILO 2008b: Freedom of Association in Practice: Lessons Learned. Global Report under the Follow-Up

to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Practice and Rights at Work: Report of the Director-General, Genf.

ILO 2008c: Governing Body. 303rd Session. Twelfth Item on the Agenda. Report of the Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, Genf.

ILO 2008d: ILC. Provisional Record. 97th Session. No. 17, Genf. ILO 2009a: Governing Body. 304th Session. Seventh Item on the Agenda. Report of the Steering Group

on the Follow-up to the Declaration on Social Justice for a fair Globalization, Genf. ILO 2009b: Governing Body. 304th Session. Third Item on the Agenda. Review of Annual Reports

under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Genf. ILO 2009c: Governing Body. 306th Session. Fourth Item on the Agenda. Improvements in the Stand-

ards-Related Activities of the ILO Towards a Final Plan of Action for the Implementation of the Standards Strategy. GB.306/LILS/4 (Rev.), Genf.

ILO 2009d: Rules of the game. A brief introduction to international labour standards, Genf. ILO 2009e: Verwaltungsrat. Zweiter Punkt der Tagesordnung. Vorschläge für die Tagesordnung der

101. Tagung (2012) der Konferenz. GB.306/2/2, Genf. ILO 2010a: Governing Body. 307th Session. Third Item on the Agenda. Review of Annual Reports

under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Genf. ILO 2010b: Governing Body. 309th Session. Second Item on the Agenda. Progress on the Implemen-

tation Plan on the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, Genf.

ILO 2010c: ILC. 99th Session. Provisional Record 10. Seventh item on the agenda: Review of the follow-up to the 1998 ILO Declaration in Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work., Genf.

ILO 2011a: Compendium of Rules Applicable to the Governing Body of the International Labour Office, Genf.


ILO 2011b: Eine neue Ära sozialer Gerechtigkeit Internationales Arbeitsamt. Bericht des Gen-eraldirektors, Genf.

ILO 2011c: GB.05 (2011-2014) Rev.8. Composition of the Governing Body of the International Labour Office (as elected on 6th June 2011), Genf.

ILO 2011d: Governing Body. 310th Session. Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards. GB.310/LILS/3/2. Improvements in the Standards-Related Activities of the ILO. Streamlining of the Sending and Processing of Information and Reports, Genf.

ILO 2011e: Governing Body. 310th Session. Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards. GB.310/LILS/5(&Add.), Genf.

ILO 2011f: Governing Body. 310th Session. Third Item on the Agenda. Review of Annual Reports under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Genf.

ILO 2011g: ILC. 100th Session. Provisional Record 15. Fourth Item on the agenda. Decent Work for domestic Workers. Report of the Committee on Domestic Work, Genf.

ILO 2011h: ILC. 100th Session. Record of Proceedings, Genf. ILO 2011i: ILC. 100th Session. Report III (1A) - Report of the Committee of Experts on the Applica-

tion of Conventions and Recommendations, Genf. ILO 2011j: Plan of action (2010-2016). Towards Widespread Ratification and Effective Implementa-

tion of the Governance Conventions, Genf. ILO 2011k: The Committee on the Application of Standards of the International Labour Conference.

A Dynamic and Impact Built on Decades of Dialogue and Persuasion, Genf. ILO 2012a: 2012 Annual Review under the Follow-Up to the ILO 1998 Declaration. Compilation of

Baseline Tables. Freedom of Association and the Effective Recognition of the right to collective Bargaining, Genf.

ILO 2012b: Governing Body. 313th Session. Institutional Section. Third Item on the Agenda. Review of Annual Reports under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Genf.

ILO 2012c: Grundlegende Prinzipien und Rechte bei der Arbeit. ILC. 101st Session. Bericht VI. Grundlegende Prinzipien und Rechte bei der Arbeit: Vom Engagement zum Handeln. Wieder-kehrende Diskussion im Rahmen der Erklärung der IAO über soziale Gerechtigkeit für eine faire Globalisierung und der Folgemaßnahmen zu der Erklärung über grundlegende Prinzipien und Rechte bei der Arbeit, Genf.

ILO 2012d: ILC. 101st Session. General Survey on the fundamental Conventions concerning rights at work in light of the ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, 2008. Giving globalization a human face. Report III (Part 1B), Genf.

ILO 2013a: 2013 Annual Review under the Follow-Up to the ILO 1998 Declaration. Compilation of Baseline Tables. Freedom of Association and the Effective Recognition of the right to collective Bargaining, Genf.


ILO 2013b: Governing Body. 317th Session. Institutional Section. Third Item on the Agenda. Review of Annual Reports under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Genf.

ILO 2013c: Governing Body. 317th Session. Legal Issues and International Labour Standards Section. International Labour Standards and Human Rights Segment. GB/LILS/3. Third Item on the Agenda. Choice of Conventions and Recommendations on which reports should be requested under article 19 of the Constitution in 2014, Genf.

ILO 2013d: ILC. 102nd Session. Provisional Record 16 (Rev.). Third Item on the Agenda: Information and Reports on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations Report of the Committee on the Application of Standards, Genf.

ILO 2013e: ILC. 102nd Session. Report III (Part 1A). Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations., Genf.

ILO 2013f: ILC. 102nd Session. Report III (Part 1B). Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations. General Survey Concerning Labour Rela-tions and Collective Bargaining in the Public Service, Genf.

ILO (Hrsg.) 2004: Child labour. A textbook for university students, Geneva.

Zitierte Übereinkommen C4 von 1919: Night Work (Women) Convention. C5 von 1919: Minimum Age (Industry) Convention. C6 von 1919: Night Work of Young Persons (Industry) Convention. C10 von 1921: Minimum Age (Agriculture) Convention. C11 von 1921: Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention. C29 von 1930: Forced Labour Convention. C33 von 1932: Minimum Age (Non-Industrial Employment) Convention. C59 von 1937: Minimum Age (Industry) Convention (Revised). C60 von 1937: Minimum Age (Non-Industrial Employment) Convention (Revised). C81 von 1947: Labour Inspection Convention. C84 von 1947: Right of Association (Non-Metropolitan Territories) Convention. C87 von 1948: Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention. C98 von 1949: Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention. C100 von 1951: Equal Remuneration Convention. C102 von 1952: Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention. C105 von 1957: Abolition of Forced Labour Convention. C107 von 1957: Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention.


C111 von 1958: Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention. C122 von 1964: Employment Policy Convention. C123 von 1965: Minimum Age (Underground Work) Convention. C129 von 1969: Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention. C138 von 1973: Minimum Age Convention. C141 von 1975: Rural Workers' Organisations Convention. C144 von 1976: Tripartite Consultation (International Labour Standards) Convention. C151 von 1978: Labour Relations (Public Service) Convention. C154 von 1981: Collective Bargaining Convention. C160 von 1985: Labour Statistics Convention. C169 von 1989: Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention. C177 von 1996: Home Work Convention. C182 von 1999: Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention. C186 von 2006: Maritime Labour Convention (MLC). C187 von 2006: Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention. C189 von 2011: Domestic Workers Convention. R91 von 1951: Collective Agreements Recommendation. R92 von 1951: Voluntary Conciliation and Arbitration Recommendation. R163 von 1981: Collective Bargaining Recommendation.

Internetquellen http://labordoc.ilo.org/; eingesehen am 30.10.2013. http://www.hrw.org/de/news/2011/06/16/ilo-bahnbrechendes-abkommen-zum-schutz-von-hausange-

stellten; eingesehen am 30.10.2013. http://www.ilo.org/declaration/follow-up/tcprojects/lang--en/index.htm; eingesehen am 16.01.2012. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12000:1611284037486853::::P12000_INSTRUMENT-

_SORT:3; eingesehen am 12.11.2013. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:11001:0::NO::: ; eingesehen am 13.11.2013. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:20060:0::NO:20060::; eingesehen am 19.02.2013. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:50010:0::NO:50010:P50010_ARTICLE_NO:24; einge-

sehen am 08.11.2013 http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:50010:3992512758007375::::P50010_DIS-

PLAY_BY:1; eingesehen am 07.11.2013. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:50011:0::NO:::; eingesehen am 06.11.2012. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:1:0; eingesehen am 03.02.2013.


http://www.ilo.org/empent/areas/business-helpdesk/faqs/WCMS_DOC_ENT_HLP_CB_FAQ_EN/ lang--en/index.htm#Q5; eingesehen am 21.11.2013.

http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/how-the-ilo-works/departments-and-offices/lang--en/in-dex.htm; eingesehen am 05.10.2013.

http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/how-the-ilo-works/international-labour-conference/lang--en/index.htm; eingesehen am 09.10.13.

http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/post-2015/documents/WCMS_213209/lang--en/index.htm, eingese-hen am 11.11.2013.

http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/mstatese.htm; eingesehen am 09.10.2012 http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/reportforms/reportformsE.htm; eingesehen am 14.01.2012. http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/subjectE.htm; eingesehen am 09.12.11. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/leg/amend/1997.htm; eingesehen am 12.11.2013. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/leg/amend/qna1986.htm; eingesehen am 27.10.2013. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/leg/declarations.htm; eingesehen am 27.11.2013 http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/leg/resolutions.htm; eingesehen am 10.10.2013. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/pardev/civil/general.htm; eingesehen am 01.02.2012. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/pardev/civil/index.htm; eingesehen am 01.02.2012. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/pardev/civil/regional.htm; eingesehen am 02.02.2012. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/pardev/civil/special_list.htm; eingesehen am 02.02.2012. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/image/wcms_-

088439.pdf; eingesehen am 29.01.2012. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/image/wcms_-



088456.pdf; eingesehen am 29.01.2012. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/genericdocument/

wcms_-159872.pdf; eingesehen am 09.11.2013. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/

wcms_ 221635.pdf , eingesehen am 11.11.2013 http://www.ioe-emp.org/ioe-members/; eingesehen am 10.10.2013. http://www.ituc-csi.org/about-us.html; eingesehen am 10.10.2012. http://www.ituc-csi.org/countries-at-risk-2013-report-on; eingesehen am 03.12.2013. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/no_03_-_list_affiliates_--_010213.pdf; eingesehen am 01.12.2013. http://www.un.org/en/members/growth.shtml#2000; eingesehen am 09.10.2012.


Experteninterviews Beatrice Vacotto, ACTRAV ILO, am 12.09.2013 in Genf. Frank Hoffer, ACTRAV ILO, am 10.09.2013 in Genf. Karen Curtis, Deputy Director ILO International Labour Standards Department, 11.09.2013 in Genf. Kenneth Schindler, ILO International Labour Standards Department, 13.05.2008 in Genf. Werner Sengenberger, Consultant für die ILO, am 10.09.2013 und am 13.09.2013 in Genf.

Anhang: Beispielkodierungen Beispielkodierungen für “Indeterminiertheit”

Dokument Code Segment 02_ILC 09616(1949-32) - Collective Bargaining (industrial relat

Flexibilität\ In-determiniert-heit

I consider that efficiency is a primary consid-eration, and I therefore regret the vagueness of some of the expressions in this text. In particular, I refer to the words " or otherwise " in clause 2 (b) of Article 1, and to the words "or other means" in paragraph 2 of Ar-ticle 2. Such expressions might lead to end-less controversy in our respective countries, and even to corrupt interpretations which I am sure none of us have considered. These circumstances seem to me to be most regret-table. We are working here for leaders of in-dustry and for workers, who all prefer to call a spade a spade. We do not wish to give free rein to the capacity of our lawyers for inter-preting such things.

S. Stübig, Flexibilität und Legitimität in der ILO, Globale Gesellschaftund internationale Beziehungen, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-08764-7,© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

372 Anhang: Beispielkodierungen

01_ILC 09616(1947-30) - Freedom of Associa-tion_1


The text which we are now discussing is not, in my opinion', sufficiently clear to meet. the aims of the Economic and Social Council. There is still a certain confusion. 'We must choose clearly between the different concep-tions of liberty, and decide which is the bet-ter, and we must, state: categorically who is the person who is tO benefit by . this free-dom ; is it the individual, or is it the trade un-ion If we grant freedom to the individual, then we are remaining faithful to the clas-sic.concèption of liberty, according to which the 'individual is free to become a member of, or to withdraw from, an organisation ,at will ; if, on the other hand,,, we say that free-doiri of association is something different, I think we must be perfectly clear on this point, because this may lead 'us to. a sort of trade union monopoly, and a State-controlled or fascist kind of trade union such as was de-fended ten years ago on this rostrum by 'the Government delegate of Italy. We who are true to the classical concept of freedom think that freedom of association is an attribute of the individual, who must, irrespective of race, colour, religion, political or other opin-ions, be absolutely free to join or not to join a trade union. If the amendment of the Work-ers' group were accepted, I think that most of these difficulties would be overcome. We must give some definition, and it must be a clear definition, of freedom of association

01_02 Rep 47B09_4_engl - Free-dom of Assoc Indus Rela_first Repo


Anhang: Beispielkodierungen 373

Beispielkodierungen für “Grad der Verpflichtung”

Dokument Code Segment

01_02 Rep 48B09_7 - Freedom of Assoc

Flexibilität\Grad der Verpflichtung

The only way effectively to assure the right to organise is by means of legislation securing to every citizen an unconditional right to estab-lish or join organisations, the " positive " right to organise.

02_ILC 09616(1949-32) - Collective Bar-gaining (industrial relat


The Workers' members declared themselves to be in favour of a Convention. They stated that the principles to be laid down by the text were of fundamental importance to the work-ers, and had already been applied in many countries, and that they should, therefore, be recognised by means of a Convention, which alone imposed legal obligations upon Govern-ments.



The Employers' members, however, desired to emphasise the point that, in their opinion, Convention No. 87 adopted at the 31st Ses-sion of the Conference, at San Francisco, al-ready contained the necessary provisions for ensuring adequate protection to all concerned and that, therefore, the Conference might con-fine itself to adopting a Recommendation simply laying down the methods of applica-tion of the general principles expressed in Ar-ticle 11 of Convention No. 87.

Beispielkodierungen für „Adaptivität“

374 Anhang: Beispielkodierungen

Dokument Code Segment 02_ Rep 47B09_10_engl (1948-31) Indus Rela rep viii_2

Flexibilität\ Adaptivität

Such regulations would be without interest as far as Norway is concerned. It is realised, however, that in certain countries it would be of importance to establish appropriate ma-chinery for the purpose of ensuring respect for the right to organise. The Convention should leave the establishment of such ma-chinery to be decided by the respective coun-tries.


Flexibilität\ Adaptivität

The United Kingdom Government member considered that an Article on these lines should be retained, as possessing the neces-sary flexibility to permit of the progressive application of social to territories not suffi-ciently developed to permit of immediate ap-plication. Countries having metropolitan ter-ritories of this kind would thus be enabled to ratify the Convention. He was opposed to the outright deletion of Article 7, but was pre-pared to accept, with one amendment, the al-ternative text submitted by the Workers' group. He suggested that the application of such an Article might be limited to Article 4 of the Office text.


Flexibilität\Adap-tivität

When one compares the systems of industrial relations which exist in countries like Swit-zerland, Belgium, Sweden, the United States, Great Britain and so on, one sees that each na-tion has adopted a different system and it would be extremely difficult to try to unify these industrial agreements or even these cus-toms which are all of them no doubt adapted to the national character, the historical devel-opment, the type of production, the political situation, the trend of trade unions, and the so-cial climate of each country.

Documents

Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis - Springer978-3-658-08764-7/1.pdf · 348 Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis Klaus Dieter/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Macht und Ohnmacht internationaler