AREVA 002-Fischer

8/8/2019 AREVA 002-Fischer

1/32


2/32


3/32


4/32

4> AREVA NP GmbH < Kurt Fischer September 26th 2006Slovak Nuclear Society Slovak Nuclear Forum

Back end Division

Front end Division Reactors and

Services Division

Transmission andDistribution Division

Energy, our core business

Front end DivisionReactors and

Services Division

Back end Division

AREVA NP


5/32


25 000 Bill. kWh

15 400 Bill. kWh

14 Bill. t HCE1)

6 Bill. Population8 Bill. Population

19 Bill. t HCE1)

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Electricity

Primary Energies

World Population

1) Hard Coal Equivalent

Growing Population and Demand on Electrical Power


6/32


World Primary Energy Demand(World Energy Council, Reference Scenario)

Billion TCE

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Hydro power

Natural gas

Oil

Coal

Nuclear energy

Other

renewable

energies2050

27,1

2020

19,4

1998

13,7

1990

12,6

1970

7,9

1980

10,4

Source:W

EC/I


7/327> AREVA NP GmbH < Kurt Fischer September 26th 2006Slovak Nuclear Society Slovak Nuclear Forum

Environment ProtectionEmission of carbon dioxide

Fossil

Source:SiemensPG,owncalc

ulations

Regenerative Nuclear0,95

0,72

0,37

0,2

0,020 0,004 0,025

UraniumWaterWindSolarOilHard

CoalLignite Gas

(Photovoltaic)

Emissions in kg CO2/kWh

Operation

Fuel

Erection

0

0,25

0,5

0,75

1

kg CO2pro kWh

0,68



Nuclear energy and Environment Protection

Nuclear energy is the only no greenhouse gas-emitting power sourcethat can effectively replace fossil fuels and satisfy global demand

Patrick Moore, founder of Greenpeace, The Miami Herald, January 30, 2005

"It's like a slow-motion train crash. If we don't do anything about this

next year, and the next, nothing will happen. But we will find soon that

our electricity supply becomes even more fragile and we get power

cuts and it will get worse.Prof. Ian Fells, Chairman New and Renewable Energy Centre,

BBC News Website, 16. Mai 2005


9/32



Economical Best Alternative: Nuclear PowerNeed of Electricity in Finland

generation cost of electricity, with emission trading

27.322.8

14.9

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

Elspot

2000

Elspot

2001

Elspot

2002

13.87.6 5.3

10.213.0

40.17.2

7.4

3.5

6.5

8.2

10.0

2.717.9

22.4

17.9

16.2

7.0

50.1

25.6

19.638.2

54.2

46.849.1

23.7

Nuclear Coal Gas Peat Wood Wind

Euro/MWh

real interest rate: 5.0 %

prices: March 2004

emission trade

20 /t CO2

fuel

operation/

maintenance

capital cost 35.3

27.7

Elspot Elspot

2003 2004

Operating hours 8000 hours/year

Operating hours

2200 hours/year

Source: R.Tarjanne & K. Luostarinen 06.04.2004

Lappeenranta University of Technology



Rising electricity demand and/or need for replace-ment of aging nuclear and fossil power plants

Instability of international markets forfossil fuels

Ongoing commitment to improving the environment

and combating climate change

Security of supply in baseload power generation

Competitive power production costs

Perspectives for New NPPs

Driving Forces

AREVA NP 11> Slovak Nuclear Society Slovak Nuclear Forum



Competitive NPPs

Safety enhancement (CDF < 10 -6/a)

Worldwide-acting vendors of NPPs

with long-term commitment

Viable sub-supplier base

Ongoing R&D and education in nuclear technology

High-level waste repositories (long-term issue)

as one of the keys for

Public acceptance

Perspectives for New NPPs

Prerequisites




Nuclear

Coal

Gas

Oil

Others

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

GW

Required capacity

Expansion

-2015

Replacement-2015 139

84

Replacement

2016 - 2030

Expansion

2016 - 2030

221

139EU-25

Age structure of installed capacity inGW

> 4031 - 4021 - 3011 - 201 - 10

Age in years

30

102

138112

90

Expansion

-2015

Replacement

-2015

139

84

Age of fleet and increasing power demand result innew and replacement power plant capacity

AREVA NP



Arevas scenarios fit with existing trends

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

GWe

DOE-EIA High DOE-EIA Low OCDE-IEA Reference

OCDE-IEA Alternative IAEA-High IAEA-Low

Arevas scenarios

Actual capacity in 2004



Reactor Generations

1950 201019901970 2030 2050

Generation IEarly Prototype Reactors

Generation IEarly Prototype Reactors

Generation II

Commercial Power Reactors: PWR, BWR, CANDU, VVER/RBMKincl. modernization, power increase and life time extension

Generation IICommercial Power Reactors: PWR, BWR, CANDU, VVER/RBMK

incl. modernization, power increase and life time extension

Generation III, IIReactors with further enhanced safety and increased competitivenes

Advanced water cooled reactors, e. g. EPR, SWR 1000, ABWR, AP10

Generation III, IReactors with further enhanced safety and increased competitivenes

Advanced water cooled reactors, e. g. EPR, SWR 1000, ABWR, AP10

Generation IVFuture Additional Reactor concepts:

e. g. HTR, FR

Generation IV

Future Additional Reactor concepts:e. g. HTR, FR

FusionFusion

TN


Thi d ti t



Third-generation reactors:Enhanced Safety, improved cost-effectiveness

SWR 1000 EPR (Evolutionary Power Reactor)

An advanced design based on proven technology

AREVA NP



EPR Conception 3rd Generation

Additional measures toprevent the occurrenceof events likely todamage the core

An extremely robust,

leak tight containmentReduced exposureof operating andmaintenance personnel

HIGHER LEVEL

OF SAFETYUses less uranium,produces less plutoniumand generatesless long-livedradioactive waste

GREATERPROTECTION

OF THEENVIRONMENT

Electrical Poweraround 1600 Mwe,

Increased

Energy efficiency,Better use of fuel,

Service life extendedto 60 years,

Increase of reactoravailability over 90%

Simplified maintenance

operation

AN EVEN MORECOMPETITIVE

REACTOR

AREVA NP



Conception of the EPR

Reactor Building

Diesel Building 3+4

Diesel Building 1+2

Turbine Building

Access Building C.I. Electrical Building

Office Building

Fuel Building

Nuclear Auxiliary Building

Waste Building

Safeguard Building 1

Safeguard Building 4

Safeguard Building 2+3

AREVA NP


19/32

OLKILUOTO , 2009



SWR 1000 our BWR option

The SWR was optionally proposed for OL 3 and its licensabilityconfirmed

The SWR 1000 remains an AREVA NP product for new builds

Selected SWR 1000 features will be offered in modernization projects

AREVA NP



Decision Taken for the First EPR in France

Nuclear Power covers 78% of electricity;

France features the lowest CO2 emission of all OECD countries

A new energy law is in the voting process of the parliament

with the aim to give priority to nuclear power in national

energy strategy

Start in next decade with modernization of the

existing power plant pool

NPPs of EPR type are planned to replace older plants

The first EPR will be erected on site of Flamanville from 2007 on

AREVA NP

Positioning the EPR on the US market



AREVAs goal is to deploy EPR plants in the USA and therefore to licence theEPR design

Design Certification Application: end 2007

AREVA and Constellation have formed UniStar Nuclear - a unique businessmodel - to market the U.S. EPR in the USA

Several US utilities have expressed strong interest and consider EPR as aviable option for future needs.

The U.S.EPR will be 100% American:

Re-engineered to conform US codes and standards

80% of supply to originate from the USA

Long-term industrial partnership contemplated

UniStar recently stepped into component manufacturing in USA

Positioning the EPR on the US market



Three Tasks for Nuclear Energy,Today and Tomorrow

Cover part of power demand growthin industrialized and emerging countries

We are readyto bear these

challenges!

Substitution of aging base-load power plants

in industrialized countries, starting about 2010

Deployment of nuclear energy in new fields

other than electricity generation,based on new reactor types (Generation IV)

AREVA NP


24/32

Back Up


25/32


EPR Safety ImprovementsMain Safeguard Systems of the EPR

Double containmentwith ventilation and

filtration

Water reserves

inside the

containment

Spreading Area

protection of

the basemat

Melt corecooling area

Containment heat

dispersion

system

Four redundant

safety systems

AREVA NP


26/32


Evolution of AREVA NPs BWR Technology

SWR 1000

(1992-2002)

Product Line 69

Product Line 72

Pressure

containment

Kahl (1961) Gundremmingen A

Lingen (1968) 1)

Wrgassen 2)

Brunsbttel (1977) 3)

Philippsburg 1 Isar 1 Tullnerfeld Krmmel

Gundremmingen B/C

(1984/85)

Solid basis of experience with outstanding performance.

1) First BWR with Fine Motion Control Rod Drives

2) With external Recirculation Loops & Internal Jet Pumps

3) First BWR with Reactor Internal Recirculation Pumps

AREVA NP


27/32


811.9 TWh

GER

139.8 TWh

434.7 TWh JAP

164.8 TWh

20.4 %30.6 %

78.0 %

34.3 %

USA

FRA

RUS

313.5 TWh

15.4%

GB

89.6 TWh

21.9%

CAN

75.9 TWh

11.8 % Source

:McGra

w

G8 - Nuclear Generation (TWh and %)


28/32


Governance

Chairman of the Supervisory Board:

Frdric Lemoine

Chairman of the Executive Board:

Anne Lauvergeon

Commissariat l'Energie Atomique (CEA) 79%

French State 5%

Investment certificate holders listed on the SBF 120 4%

Caisse des dpts et consignations 4%

ERAP 3%

EDF 2%

Frampargne 2%

Total 1%

Shareholders

AREVA NP


29/32


Key data for 2005

Sales revenue by division(in millions of euros and employees)

Front End

division

Employees11,047

Sales 2.631 M

Reactors

& Services

division

Employees14,323

Sales 2.348 M

Back End

division

Employees10,864

Sales 1.921 M

Transmission

& Distribution

division

Employees22,094

Sales 3.212 M

Front End division

Reactors & Services

divisionBack End division

Transmission & Distribution

division

10.1 M

Front endReactors& Services

division

Back enddivision

Transmission& Distribution

division

AREVA NP


30/32


The Finland case:Why additional Nuclear Power?

New nuclear power plantcovers partly the additional electricity demand and replaces

old power plants

enables, together with renewable, the fulfillment of the

Kyoto commitments

secures stable and predictable electrical price

reduces the dependence on electricity import

AREVA NP


31/32


32/32

Generation IV International Forum (GIF):Reactor Types Selected for Development

Gas Fast Reactor (GFR)

Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)

Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR)

Lead Fast Reactor (LFR)

Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR)

Super Critical Water cooled Reactor (SCWR)

Documents

AREVA 002-Fischer