Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mundflora des
MenschenHintergrundinformation zum
Präparationsabend in der MGW 2014
Präparate:
• Abstrich von Zahnplaque
• Ausstrich von Lactobazillus casei (aus
Medikamentenkapsel)
Einleitung....
• GI tract: 1014 Mikroorganismen
• ca. 6x 1013 Zellen im menschl. Körper
Microbial ecosystem in the oral cavity: Metabolic diversity in an ecological niche and ist relationship with
oral diseases Nobuhiro Takahashi *
International Congress Series 1284 (2005) 103– 112
http://www.infection-research.de/de/perspectives/view/detail/23/shape_matters_why_bacteria_care_how_they_look/
Historischer Rückblick
Historischer Rückblick
• 1873: Mycobacterium leprae durch Gerhard Armauer Hansen
• 1876: Bacillus anthracis durch Robert Koch
• 1877: Clostridium septicum durch Louis Pasteur, Jules Joubert
• 1879: Neisseria gonorrhoeae durch Albert Neisser
• 1880: Salmonella typhi durch Karl Joseph Eberth, Erysipelothrix muriseptica durch Robert Koch
• 1882: Mycobacterium tuberculosis durch Robert Koch
• Streptococcus pyogenes durch Friedrich Fehleisen
• 1883: Vibrio cholerae durch Robert Koch, Corynebacterium xerosis durch Albert Neisser und S. Kuschbert
• 1884: Corynebacterium diphtheriae durch F. Loeffler und Clostridium tetani durch Arthur Nicolaier
• 1886: Streptococcus pneumoniae (Syn. Diplococcus p.) durch Albert Fraenkel (1848–1916) und Anton Weichselbaum, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae durch F. Loeffler
• 1887: Neisseria meningitidis durch Anton Weichselbaum, Corynebacterium pseudodiphthericum durch Franz Adolf Hofmann, Streptococcus agalactiae durch E. Nocard und H. Mollereau
• 1888: Salmonella enteritidis durch August Gärtner
• 1891: Salmonella typhimurium durch Friedrich Loeffler
• Clostridium botulinum durch Emile van Ermengem
• 1897: Propionibacterium acnes (Syn. Corynebacterium acnes) durch Raymond Sabouraud
• 1898: Shigella dysenteriae durch Kiyoshi Shiga, Mycoplasma durch E. Nocard, Émile Roux
• 1900: Salmonella paratyphi B durch Hugo Schottmüllr, Shigella flexneri (Syn. S. paradysenteriae B) durch Simon Flexner und Richard Pearson Strong Shigella boydii durch Boyd
• 1903: Enterococcus faecalis (Syn. Streptococcus f.) durch Theodor Escherich
• 1905: Treponema pallidum durch Fritz Schaudinn, Erich Hoffmann, Treponema pertenue durch Aldo Castellani
• 1907: Chlamydia trachomatis durch Ludwig Halberstaedter und Stanislaus von Prowazek
• 1983: Helicobacter pylori durch Barry Marshall und John Robin Warren
Gram Färbung
• Färben: Im ersten Schritt färbt man mit einer Lösung von Gentianaviolett mit Zusatz von 15 g/l Phenol, sogenanntem „Karbol-Gentianaviolett“. Hierbei werden alle Bakterien, grampositive wie gramnegative, gefärbt. Bei der nachfolgenden Behandlung mit Lugolscher Lösung werden größere Farbstoff-Komplexe gebildet, alle Bakterien erscheinen dunkelblau.
• Entfärben („Differenzieren“): Im zweiten Schritt erfolgt eine Behandlung mit 96 %igem Ethanol. Dabei verhalten sich grampositive und gramnegative Bakterien verschieden: gramnegative Bakterien werden wieder entfärbt, während die blauen Farbstoffkomplexe aus grampositiven Bakterien mit dem Alkohol nicht ausgewaschen werden können.
• Gegenfärben: Zur Darstellung der gramnegativen Bakterien können diese abschließend mit verdünnter Fuchsinlösung (eine Lösung von Fuchsin mit Phenol in etwa 1/10 der üblichen Konzentrationen von „Karbolfuchsin“) oder Safraninlösung gegengefärbt werden, worauf sie rot beziehungsweise rotorange erscheinen.
C. Gram: Über die isolirte Färbung der Schizomyceten in Schnitt- und Trockenpräparaten. In:
Fortschritte der Medicin. Vol. 2, 1884, S. 185–189.
1. grampositive Zellwand
2. 2. gramnegative Zellwand
3. Peptidoglycan (Murein)
4. Plasmamembran
5. Zytoplasma
6. Periplasmatischer Raum, bei grampos.
Bakterien die inner wall zone (IWZ)
3. 7. äußere Membran
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY,
Nov. 2005, p. 5721–5732 Vol. 43, No. 11
0095-1137/05/$08.000
doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721–5732.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for
Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Defining the Normal Bacterial Flora of the
Oral Cavity
Jørn A. Aas,1,2* Bruce J. Paster,1,3 Lauren
N. Stokes,1 Ingar Olsen,2
and Floyd E. Dewhirst1,3
Department of Molecular Genetics, The
Forsyth Institute,1 and Faculty of Dentistry,2
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,
and Department of Oral and Developmental
Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts3
Received 10 June 2005/Returned for
modification 2 August 2005/Accepted 12
August 2005
Mundflora...
The Normal Bacterial
Flora of Humans
© Kenneth Todar, PhD
Pyrosequencing Analysis of the
Oral Microflora of Healthy AdultsB.J.F. Keijser1, E. Zaura2, S.M.
Huse3,
J.M.B.M. van der Vossen1, F.H.J. Schuren1,
R.C. Montijn1, J.M. ten Cate2,
and W. Crielaard2*
1TNO Quality of Life, Business Unit Food and
Biotechnology Innovations, Microbial Genomics Group,
Zeist, The Netherlands; 2Department of Cariology
Endodontology Pedodontology, Academic Centre for
Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam
and VU Amsterdam, Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam,
The Netherlands; and 3Josephine Bay Paul Center,
Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, USA;
*corresponding author, [email protected]
Gram positiv Gram negativ
Staphylokokken Bacteroidaceae:
Fusobacterien, Prevotella,Porphyromonas, Bacteroides
Streptokokken Haemophilus
Actinomyceten Spirochäten
Lactobacillus Neisserien
Corynebacterium Veilonella
Anaeobier: Eubacterium,
Propionibacterium,
Bifidobacterium
Actinobacillus
Rothia Gemella
Capnocytophaga
Eikenella
Gram positiv
Staphylokokken
• 30 Spezies; 1μm DM
• Gram pos. unbewegliche Mikrokokken
• Fakultativ anaerob
• S. aureus
• S. epidermidis
• S. saprophyticus
http://www.atsu.edu/faculty/chamberlain/Website
Orale Streptokokken
• S. mutans
• S. sangius
• S. mitis
• S. salivarius
• S. anginosus
• Ketten oder Diplokokken, unbeweglich, sporenlos 1μm DM; fakultativ anaeron (aerotolerant)
• Bilden aus Kohlehydrate Milchsäure (Lactat)
• 50-70% der Endokarditiden
• Karies
• S. Pyogenes (A Streptokokken)
• S. agalactiae (B-Streptokokken)
• S. pneumoniae (Pneumokokken): meist
Diplokokken + Kapsel: wohnt in SH des oberen
Respirationstraktes: Pneumonie; Otitis media;
Sinusitis; Meningitis
Exkurs: Pyogene Streptokokken
PeptostreptokokkenAnaerob, gram pos. Kokken
Karies; Peridontitis
P. anaerobius
P. asaccharolyticus
P. harei
P. hydrogenalis
P. indoliticus
P. ivorii
P. lacrimalis
P. lactolyticus
P. magnus
P. micros
P. octavius
P. prevotii
P. tetradius
P. vaginalis
Actinomyces
Pleomorphe, verzweigte grampos. Stäbchen mit Knäuelbildung
Früher als Pilz aufgefasst; nicht sporenbildend
Fakultativer Anaerobier – flexibler Stoffwechsel
Produziert Säuren nach Kohlenhydrataufnahme
Bis 50 μm lang
A. israelii -> Zahnplaque; Abszesse in Mundhöhle
A. naeslundii -> Zahnplaque: Karies; Gingivitis
Infektionen als Mischinfektion möglich mit Anaerobier wie
Actinobacillus actinomycetemconcomitans oder mit fakultativ
anaerobier wie Staphylokokken, Streptokokken;
A. odontolyticus
A. georgiae
Lactobacillus
Lactobacillus casei ist ein stäbchenförmiges grampositives Bakterium. Es gehört zu den kleineren Lactobacillus-Arten und
wächst in Form kürzerer oder längerer Stäbchen mit meist abgerundeten Ecken und einer Größe von durchschnittlich 0,9 µm
Durchmesser und 2 µm Länge. Sie liegen meist einzeln oder in Paaren, seltener in kurzen Ketten vor.[1]
Das Wachstumsoptimum liegt bei etwa 30 °C, ob Wachstum bei 15 und 45 °C möglich ist, wird von verschiedenen Autoren
unterschiedlich angegeben. Das Wachstum in Milch ist sehr langsam, die proteolytische Aktivität hoch und durch
homofermentative Milchsäuregärung können bis zu 1,5 % Milchsäure gebildet werden. Hierbei wird ein Gemisch aus L- und D-
Milchsäure mit deutlich vorherrschendem Anteil der L-Form erzeugt.[2] Sie können viele Kohlenhydrate, darunter Melezitose, aber
nicht Melibiose und Xylose abbauen. Gluconat aber nicht Glukose kann unter Gasproduktion zu Milchsäure vergoren werden
Lactobacillus acidophilus ist ein mittellanges, fakultativ anaerobes, grampositives Stäbchen mit abgerundeten Enden, das einzeln,
in Paaren oder kurzen Ketten vorkommt. Es wächst auch in saurer Umgebung (pH 4–5 und tiefer) und bei Temperaturen bis 45
Grad Celsius. Durch Hitze und Sonneneinstrahlung wird das Bakterium abgetötet. Das Bakterium ist Katalase-negativ und
Oxidase-negativ.
L. acidophilus kommt in verschiedenen Lebensmitteln, wie Milch, Getreide, Fleisch und Fisch vor. Innerhalb des Menschen
besiedelt L. acidophilus den Mund, den Verdauungstrakt und die Vagina bzw. beim Mann das unverhornte Plattenepithel der
Fossa navicularis, den erweiterten Bereich kurz vor der Harnröhrenöffnung.
Im Allgemeinen vergärt das Bakterium homofermentativ Laktose zu Milchsäure. Einige heterofermentative Stämme können
Ethanol, Kohlendioxid und Essigsäure produzieren
Verschiedene Arten von Lactobacillus bilden die sogenannte Döderlein-Bakterien oder Döderleinsche Stäbchen. Die Döderlein-
Bakterien sind ein Teil der natürlichen Scheidenflora der Frau. Durch die Gärung erzeugen die Bakterien in der Scheide eine
saure Umgebung und schützen so die Scheide vor anderen, krankheitserregenden Bakterien, die einen niedrigen pH-Wert nicht
tolerieren. Zu den bei verschiedenen Untersuchungen am häufigsten bestimmten Arten[15][16] zählen Lactobacillus crispatus, L.
iners, L. gasseri und L. jensenii. Früher wurde Lactobacillus acidophilus als dominierende Art in der Scheidenflora von gesunden
Frauen bestimmt
wikipedia
Figure 5. A Lactobacillus species, possibly Doderlein's bacillus, in
association with a vaginal epithelial cell
The Normal Bacterial Flora of Humans
© Kenneth Todar, PhD
Corynebakterien
• Polymorphe, keulenförmige Stäbchen
• Grampositiv
• C. matruchotii
• C. durum• Bestandteil von Plaque
• Fraglich pathogen
http://www.medschool.lsuhsc.edu/microbiology/DMIP/dmex15.htm
Anarobe Gram-positive Stäbchen
Eubacterium
Pleomorphic rods or filaments, -> caries & periodontal
disease
50% of anaerobes of periodontal pockets
E. yurii; E. brachy; E. timidum; E. nodatum
Propionibacterium
Strict anaerobic bacilli (root surface caries & plaque)
P. acnes;
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Aug. 1987, p. 1540-1545
0095.1137/87/081540-06$02.00/0 Copyright © 1987, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 25, No. 8
Characteristics and Sites of Infection of Eubacterium nodatum, Eubacterium timidum, Eubacterium brachy, and OtherAsaccharolyt ic Eubacteria
GALE B. HILL,',2'3* OUIDA M. AYERS,l AND ALFREDA P. KOHAN3
Obstetric and Gynecologic Anaerobic Microbiology Research Laboratory,' Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2
and Anaerobe Section, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,3 Duke University Medical Center, Durham,
North Carolina 27710
Received 17 December 1986/Accepted 14 May 1987
Eubacterium nodatum
bacterioweb.univ-fcomte.fr
„Propionibacterium acnes ist ein gram-positives kurzes, stäbchenförmiges Bakterium, auch ellipsoide
Zellformen kommen vor. Eine einzelne Zelle ist 0,4–0,5 µm (Mikrometer) breit und 0,8–0,9 µm lang.[1] Im
lichtmikroskopischen Bild finden sich meist paarweise angeordnete Zellen, die nicht direkt hintereinander
liegen, sondern in einem Winkel. Dies führt bei weiteren Zellteilungen zur Ausbildung von V- oder Y-förmigen
Ketten.[2] Das Bakterium besitzt keine Flagellen zur aktiven Bewegung und kann keine
Überdauerungsformen wie Endosporen bilden“ (wikipedia)
http://cienciahoje.uol.com.br/noticias/microbiologia/um-universo-em-seu-braco/
Propionibacterium acnes
“Rothia dentocariosa is a species of gram-positive, round- to rod-shaped bacteria that
is part of the normal community of microbes residing in the mouth and respiratory tract.
First isolated from dental caries, Rothia dentocariosa is largely benign, but does very rarely
cause disease. The most common Rothia infection is endocarditis, typically in people with
underlying heart valve disorders.[1] Literature case reports show other tissues that are rarely
infected include the peritoneum,[2] tonsils,[3] lung,[1] cornea,[4] inner layers of the eye
(Endophthalmitis)[5] and brain and intercranial tissues.[1] It has been implicated in
periodontal disease, and one hypothesis is that Rothia periodontal disease, or dental
procedures in turn, may be first steps in the infection of other tissues.[1] One case reports
on a fatal Rothia dentocariosa infection of a fetus in utero.[6] Another reports the bacterium
was responsible for septic arthritis in the knee of a person treated with etanercept for
rheumatoid arthritis.[7] Like other Rothia infections reported in the literature, once the cause
of infection was identified, this responded fully to treatment with antibiotics. Rothia infections
may be treated with penicillins, erythromycin, cefazolin, rifampin, aminoglycoside,
tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.[1]
Variable or pleomorphic in shape and similar to Actinomyces and Nocardia, Rothia was only
defined as a genus in 1967.[1] Rothia dentocariosa, like several other species of oral
bacteria, is able to reduce nitrate to nitrite, and one study found it in 3% of isolates of nitrate-
reducing bacteria from the mouth “ (wikipedia)
Granulicatella
• G. elegans
• G. adiacens
• Pleomorphe gram pos. Kokken (früher
„Satelittenstreptokokken“ um Staphylokokken)
• Endokarditiserreger
Abiotrophia defectiva
• Pleomorphe gram pos. Kokken
• „Satelittenstreptokokken“
J. Clin. Microbiol. May 1999 vol. 37 no. 5
1564-1566 Abiotrophia Species as a Cause
of Endophthalmitis Following Cataract
Extraction
Hassan Namdari1,2,3,*, Kathleen Kintner2,
Barbara A. Jackson3, Surena Namdari1,
Joan L. Hughes1, Randall R. Peairs3, and
Donald J. Savage
Gram negativ
Neisserien• Gramnegative, paarige, aerobe Kokken
• N. subflava
• N. polysaccharea
• N. baciliformis
• N. mucosa
• N. elongata
• Rolle in der Plaqueentstehung ?
This photomicrograph reveals the presence of the Gram-negative bacteria, Neisseria subflava.By:
CDC/ Dr. W. A. Clark, Courtesy: Public Health Image Library
Views: 308 | Downloads: 0
Neisseria meningitidis. Gram stain.
The Normal Bacterial Flora of Humans
© Kenneth Todar, PhD
Spirochäten• Treponema: gram neg: • T. denticola, T. macrodentium:
• Strict anaerobes
• -> Gingivitis, Perodontitis
Nach Kohlenbrander et al 2002
Bacteroidaceae
• Obligat, anaerobe, gram neg. pleomorphe
Stäbchen, nicht sporenbildend• Porphyromonas gingivalis
• Prevotella
• Fusobacterium
• Bacteroides
• Tanerella
Porphyromonas gingivalis
• Gram neg. Anaerobier mit Fimbrien
• Parodontitiskeim
• P. gingivalis, P. endodontalis; P. asacharolytica (pleomorphic Stäbchen)
• Adhärent an initilae Plaqueorganismen wie Streptokokken oder Actinomyceten
• Periodontitis, dentoalveolarer Abszess
Prevotella
• P. intermedia, P. melaninogenica (pleomorphic rods); P. nigrescens; P. oris
• Strikt anaerob, gram negativ
• Auch Bestandteil der Vaginalflora
• Zahnplaque,
• -> chronische periodontitis, dentoalveolar abszess
http://www.lookfordiagnosis.com
Prevotella melaninogenica, Gram stain: A gram negative coccobacillus
http://aapredbook.aappublications.org/site/week/iotw081108.xhtml
Fusobacterien
Fusobacterium nucleatum
Strikt anaerob; nicht sporenbildend, Gram neg.
-> akute ulcerative Gingivitis
-> dentoalveolar Abszess
Gram-negative stained culture of F. nucleatum. Image Courtesy of J. Michael Miller, Ph.D.,(D)ABMM of
National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-borne, and Enteric Diseases. Picture submitted by him to American
Society for Microbiology
http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/File%3AFnuclea1.JPG
Long, pointy Gram-negative rods typical of Fusobacterium nucleatum
http://infectionnet.org/supporting-content/fusobacterium-nucleatum/
Infect Immun. 1989 October; 57(10): 3194–3203. PMCID: PMC260789Coaggregation of Fusobacterium nucleatum,
Selenomonas flueggei, Selenomonas infelix, Selenomonas noxia, and Selenomonas sputigena with strains from 11
genera of oral bacteria.
P E Kolenbrander, R N Andersen, and L V Moore
Laboratory of Microbial Ecology, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Author information ► Copyright and License information ►
Copyright notice
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Twenty-eight strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum and 41 Selenomonas strains, including S. sputigena (24 strains), S.
flueggei (10 strains), S. infelix (5 strains), and S. noxia (2 strains), were tested for their ability to coaggregate with
each other and with 49 other strains of oral bacteria representing Actinobacillus, Actinomyces, Bacteroides,
Capnocytophaga, Gemella, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Propionibacterium, Rothia, Streptococcus, and
Veillonella species. Selenomonads coaggregated with fusobacteria and with Actinomyces naeslundii PK984 but not
with any of the other bacteria, including other selenomonads. In contrast, fusobacteria coaggregated with members of
all genera, although not with all strains of each species tested. Each fusobacterium strain appeared to have its own
set of partners and coaggregation properties, unlike their partners, whose coaggregation properties in earlier surveys
delineated distinct coaggregation groups. Coaggregations of fusobacteria with the 63 gram-negative strains were
usually inhibited by EDTA, whereas those with the 27 gram-positive strains were usually not inhibited. Likewise,
lactose-inhibitable coaggregations were common among some strains of fusobacteria and some strains from each of
the genera containing gram-negative partners but were rarely observed with gram-positive partners. Heating the
fusobacteria at 85 degrees C for 30 min completely prevented coaggregation with most partners, suggesting the
involvement of a protein on the fusobacteria. Heat treatment of many of the gram-negative partners not only enhanced
their coaggregation with the fusobacteria but also changed lactose-sensitive coaggregations to lactose-insensitive
coaggregations. Although fusobacteria coaggregated with a broader variety of oral partner strains than any other
group of oral bacteria tested to date, each fusobacterium exhibited coaggregation with only a certain set of partner
strains, and none of the fusobacteria adhered to other strains of fusobacteria, indicating that recognition of partner cell
surfaces is selective. The strains of F. nucleatum are heterogeneous and cannot be clustered into distinct
coaggregation groups. Collectively, these results indicate that coaggregation between fusobacteria and many gram-
negative partners is significantly different from their coaggregation with gram-positive partners. The contrasting variety
of partners for fusobacteria and selenomonads supports the concept of coaggregation partner specificity that has
been observed with every genus of oral bacteria so far examined
Eikenella• Eikenella corrodens: unbeweglich, kokkoides Kurzstäbchen
• E. corrodens (coccobacilli): plaque
• -> dentoalveolar Abszess, chronische Periodontitis,
• Endocarditis
Easow JM, Joseph NM, Tuladhar R, Shivananda P G. Empyema caused by Eikenella corrodens. J Global Infect Dis [serial online] 2011 [cited 2014
Oct 5];3:303-5. Available from: http://www.jgid.org/text.asp?2011/3/3/303/83546
Veillonella
Gram neg.Anaerobe Kokken
Verwertet Lactat zu Acetat
V. atypica: lebt v.a. in Zungen SH
V. parvula
http://www.atsu.edu/faculty/chamberlain/Website
Haemophilus parainfluenzae: gram neg. coccobazilli
Facultative anaerobes (plaque, saliva & mucosal surfaces)
-> acute bacterial epiglottitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, meningitis
Haemophilus
http://www.pathinformatics.com/microbiology/saeVIII/saeVIII-1.htm
Actinobacillus (Aggregatibacter)
Gram neg, fakult. Anaerobier; nicht sporenbildend, unbeweglich
A. actinomycetemcomitans (coccobacilli)
subgingivale Plaque, Periodontitis
Begleitkeim von Aktinomykosen
Capnocytophagalange dünne fusiforme Stäbchen, gram neg.
CO2-abhängig, fakult. anaerob
C. gingivalis, C, sputigena; C. ochraceae
Peridontitis
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_artte
xt&pid=S0716-10182007000100009
Die Arten Capnocytophaga gingivalis, C. ochracea,
C. sputigena, C. granulosa und C. haemolytica
kommen in der Mundflora des Menschen vor,
Capnocytophaga canimorsus und C. cynodegmi in
der Mundflora von Hunden und Katzen.
Moraxellaceae
• Moraxella (Brabhamella) catharalis
• Kingella: K. dentificans
• Plumpe, kokkoide, gram neg. Kurzstäbchen, aerob
Kingella kingae
http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v20/n9/fig_tab/6702119f2.html
Infect Immun. 1989 October; 57(10): 3194–3203. PMCID: PMC260789Coaggregation of Fusobacterium nucleatum,
Selenomonas flueggei, Selenomonas infelix, Selenomonas noxia, and Selenomonas sputigena with strains from 11
genera of oral bacteria.
P E Kolenbrander, R N Andersen, and L V Moore
Laboratory of Microbial Ecology, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Author information ► Copyright and License information ►
Copyright notice
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Twenty-eight strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum and 41 Selenomonas strains, including S. sputigena (24 strains), S.
flueggei (10 strains), S. infelix (5 strains), and S. noxia (2 strains), were tested for their ability to coaggregate with
each other and with 49 other strains of oral bacteria representing Actinobacillus, Actinomyces, Bacteroides,
Capnocytophaga, Gemella, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Propionibacterium, Rothia, Streptococcus, and
Veillonella species. Selenomonads coaggregated with fusobacteria and with Actinomyces naeslundii PK984 but not
with any of the other bacteria, including other selenomonads. In contrast, fusobacteria coaggregated with members of
all genera, although not with all strains of each species tested. Each fusobacterium strain appeared to have its own
set of partners and coaggregation properties, unlike their partners, whose coaggregation properties in earlier surveys
delineated distinct coaggregation groups. Coaggregations of fusobacteria with the 63 gram-negative strains were
usually inhibited by EDTA, whereas those with the 27 gram-positive strains were usually not inhibited. Likewise,
lactose-inhibitable coaggregations were common among some strains of fusobacteria and some strains from each of
the genera containing gram-negative partners but were rarely observed with gram-positive partners. Heating the
fusobacteria at 85 degrees C for 30 min completely prevented coaggregation with most partners, suggesting the
involvement of a protein on the fusobacteria. Heat treatment of many of the gram-negative partners not only enhanced
their coaggregation with the fusobacteria but also changed lactose-sensitive coaggregations to lactose-insensitive
coaggregations. Although fusobacteria coaggregated with a broader variety of oral partner strains than any other
group of oral bacteria tested to date, each fusobacterium exhibited coaggregation with only a certain set of partner
strains, and none of the fusobacteria adhered to other strains of fusobacteria, indicating that recognition of partner cell
surfaces is selective. The strains of F. nucleatum are heterogeneous and cannot be clustered into distinct
coaggregation groups. Collectively, these results indicate that coaggregation between fusobacteria and many gram-
negative partners is significantly different from their coaggregation with gram-positive partners. The contrasting variety
of partners for fusobacteria and selenomonads supports the concept of coaggregation partner specificity that has
been observed with every genus of oral bacteria so far examined
Campylobacter
• C. showae (1993)
• C. gracilis
• C. curvus
• C. concisus
• Oxidativer Energiestoffwechsel („Nitrat-Atmer“)• „Die Zellgröße liegt im Bereich von 0,2–0,8 × 0,5–5 Mikrometer. Sie sind
entweder mit jeweils einer einzelnen Geißel unipolar an einem Ende oder
bipolar an beiden Enden der Zelle begeißelt. Die Zellen können sich im
Laufe der Kultur von korkenzieherförmig zu kokkenförmig ändern. Die
meisten Arten von Campylobacter sind Katalase- und Oxidase-positiv, zu
den Katalase-negativen zählen beispielsweise C. sputorum, C. concisus, C.
mucosalis und C. helveticus. Die medizinisch wichtigen C. fetus subsp.
fetus, C. coli, C. jejun subsp. jejuni sind Katalase-positiv“ (wikipedia)
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;43(4):631-9.
Campylobacter showae sp. nov., isolated from the human oral cavity.
Etoh Y, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Yamamoto A, Goto N.
Author information Department of Oral Microbiology, Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo,
Japan.
Abstract
Nine Campylobacter-like strains were isolated from human gingival crevices and characterized. These
strains were gram-negative, straight rods that were motile by means of multiple unipolar flagella. They
were asaccharolytic and preferred an anaerobic atmosphere rather than a microaerophilic atmosphere
for growth, and their growth was stimulated by formate and fumarate. These strains were biochemically
similar to Campylobacter curvus and Campylobacter rectus, but were clearly distinguishable from these
organisms by the number of flagella (two to five flagella at one end of the cell), by being catalase
positive, by their whole-cell protein profiles, by their Western blot (immunoblot) patterns, and on the
basis of DNA-DNA homology data. They could also be differentiated from the other species of the genus
Campylobacter. The nine Campylobacter-like strains were compared with two strains (FDC 286 and VPI
10279) representing a previously described but unnamed Wolinella sp. The nine isolates and strains
FDC 286 and VPI 10279 were found to be members of a single species. The 16S rRNA sequences of
two strains of the newly identified species were compared with the rRNA sequences of 21 reference
Campylobacter, Wolinella, and Helicobacter species in order to generate a phylogenetic tree. We
propose the name Campylobacter showae for the newly identified strains; strain SU A4 (= ATCC 51146)
is the type strain of this new species.
Expand+Journal of Dental Researchjdr.sagepub.comdoi:
10.1177/00220345000790021301 JDR February 2000 vol. 79 no. 2 785-792
Campylobacter Species in Health, Gingivitis, and Periodontitis
P.J. Macuch
Altran Corporation, Boston, MA
A.C.R. Tanner
The Forsyth Institute, 140 Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Abstract
At least seven Campylobacter species have been identified from subgingival sites.
Campylobacter rectus has been implicated as a periodontal pathogen; however,
association with periodontal infections of other Campylobacter species, especially the
newly described Campylobacter showae, is unclear. This study examined which
Campylobacter species were associated with periodontal health and disease. Subgingival
Campylobacter species from initial and established periodontitis were compared with
species from periodontally healthy subjects, including subjects with gingivitis.
Campylobacter species were isolated on selective media and identified by whole-cell
protein profiles (SDS-PAGE). Except for C. rectus, Campylobacter levels were frequently
below the detection limit (2-5% of the microbiota) of non-selective culture methods. C.
rectus and C. showae, including Campylobacter X, were found more frequently and in
higher levels from diseased than from healthy periodontal sites. C. gracilis was the
dominant Campylobacter species found in relatively shallow pockets; however, its
presence was unrelated to periodontal health or disease. C. concisus was isolated in
higher proportions from relatively shallow and healthy sites, compared with deeper
pockets. C. curvus was unrelated to periodontal health or disease. Analysis of the study
data confirmed the relationship of C. rectus with diseased subgingival sites and indicated
that C. showae may also be associated with periodontal disease.
C. rectus
Curr Microbiol. 2012 Jul;65(1):22-7. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0121-8. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
Quantification of subgingival bacterial pathogens at different stages of periodontal diseases.
Lee HJ, Kim JK, Cho JY, Lee JM, Hong SH.
Author information Department of Oral Microbiology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National
University, 2-188-1 Samduk-dong, Jung-gu, Daegu, South Korea.
Abstract
Anaerobic gram-negative oral bacteria such as Treponema denticola, Aggregatibacter
actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter rectus,
and Fusobacterium nucleatum are closely associated with periodontal diseases. We measured the
relative population (bacterial levels) of these oral pathogens in subgingival tissues of patients at
different stages of Korean chronic periodontal diseases. We divided the individuals into those with
chronic gingivitis (G), moderate periodontitis (P1), severe periodontitis (P2), and normal individuals
(N) (n = 20 for each group) and subgingival tissue samples were collected. We used real-time
PCR with TaqMan probes to evaluate the change of periodontal pathogens among different stages
of periodontitis. Bacterial levels of A. actinomycetemcomitans and C. rectus are significantly
increased in individuals with chronic gingivitis and moderate periodontitis, but unchanged in severe
periodontitis patients. These results suggest that analyzing certain bacterial levels among total oral
pathogens may facilitate understanding of the role of periodontal bacteria in the early stages of
periodontitis
HistophysiologiePlaqueentstehung
Krankheiten durch orale Bakterien
Ökologische Nischen im Mund
Microbial ecosystem in the oral cavity: Metabolic diversity in an ecological niche and ist relationship with
oral diseases Nobuhiro Takahashi *
International Congress Series 1284 (2005) 103– 112
Oral bacterial colonization. From the following article:
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Paul E. Kolenbrander, Robert J. Palmer, Jr, Saravanan Periasamy & Nicholas S. Jakubovics
Nature Reviews Microbiology 8, 471-480 (July 2010) doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381
Spatiotemporal model of oral bacterial colonization, showing recognition of salivary
pellicle receptors by initial colonizing bacteria and coaggregations between initial
colonizers, fusobacteria and late colonizers of the tooth surface. Collectively, these
interactions are proposed to represent development of dental plaque. Starting at the
bottom, initial colonizers, Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus
oralis and Streptococcus sanguinis, bind to complementary salivary receptors
(sialylated mucins, proline-rich protein, α-amylase, salivary agglutinin and bacterial
cell fragments) in the acquired pellicle coating the tooth surface. Late colonizers bind
to previously bound bacteria. Sequential binding results in the appearance of nascent
surfaces that bridge with the next coaggregating partner cell. Coaggregation is
different from aggregation that occurs between genetically identical cells and from
agglutination of cells through interaction of cells with soluble molecules, for example,
antibodies. Most coaggregations are between cells of different genera; Fusobacterium
nucleatum strains, for example, coaggregate intergenerically with representatives of
all oral bacterial species. However, intrageneric coaggregation among fusobacterial
strains is only rarely observed. In sharp contrast, streptococci exhibit broad
intrageneric coaggregation partnerships (for example, S. gordonii and S. oralis) as
well as intraspecies partnerships (for example, S. gordonii DL1 and S. gordonii 38).
Each bacterial strain exhibits specificity in partners. For example, some streptococci
are capable of coaggregating with certain Veillonella spp., whereas other streptococci
cannot coaggregate with those veillonellae but do coaggregate with a separate group
of veillonellae24. Figure modified, with permission, from Ref. 106 © American Society
for Microbiology (2002).
Columbia university: school of dental and oral surgery
Prävalenz der Proteasen von Tannerella forsythia in subgingivaler Plaque Dissertation zur Erlangung des
akademischen Grades doctor medicinae dentariae (Dr. med. dent.) vorgelegt dem Rat der Medizinischen Fakultät
der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jenavon Sebastian Gäßner geboren am 08.08.83 in Leipzig
Orale Mikrobiologie von Philip Marsh,Michael V. Martin; Thieme Verlag
Krankheiten durch orale Bakterien
• Gingivitis
• Parodontitis
• Dentoalveoläre Abzesse
• Tonsillitis
• Pharyngitis
• Sinusitis
• Otitis media
• Endokarditis
• Epiglottitis
• Pneumonie
• Meningitis