26
3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 – Design, Modeling & Simulation 21 November 2019 | Darmstadt Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher, Maximilian Rösner, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Berthold Schlecht Institut für Maschinenelemente und Maschinenkonstruktion Lehrstuhl Maschinenelemente Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK

New Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK · 2019. 12. 23. · Page 2 dimensioning: ship hull, thruster housing, blades, couplings, motor, drive train, … dimensioning:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 – Design, Modeling & Simulation21 November 2019 | Darmstadt

    Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher, Maximilian Rösner, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Berthold SchlechtInstitut für Maschinenelemente und Maschinenkonstruktion Lehrstuhl Maschinenelemente

    Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 2

    dimensioning: ship hull, thruster housing, blades, couplings, motor, drive train, …

    dimensioning: drive train components

    standards (DIN 743, ISO 6336) software (mdesign, KissSoft, ..)

    finite-element-method (Nastran, Ansys, …)

    ? measurement → component load ?

    determination of design loads for single components by

    transfer/ extrapolation of measured forces and torques

    ? simulation → component load ?

    determination of design loads for single components by

    transfer/ extrapolation of simulated forces and torques

    loads loads

    multibody-system simulation (MBS)

    calculation of design loads for single components by

    recalculation of measured or simulated load cases

    global load assumptions (forces/torques hub, motor)

    measurement of forces and torques at thruster

    simulation of propeller loads (CFD)

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 3

    dimensioning: ship hull, thruster housing, blades, couplings, motor, drive train, …

    dimensioning: drive train components

    standards (DIN 743, ISO 6336) software (mdesign, KissSoft, ..)

    finite-element-method (Nastran, Ansys, …)

    ? measurement → component load ?

    determination of design loads for single components by

    transfer/ extrapolation of measured forces and torques

    ? simulation → component load ?

    determination of design loads for single components by

    transfer/ extrapolation of simulated forces and torques

    loads loads

    multibody-system simulation (MBS)

    calculation of design loads for single components by

    recalculation of measured or simulated load cases

    global load assumptions (forces/torques hub, motor)

    measurement of forces and torques at thruster

    simulation of propeller loads (CFD)

    paddle wheel conventional screw propeller

    Voith-Schneider propeller

    www.saechsische-dampfschiffahrt.de www.maritimepropulsion.com www.voith.com

    azimuth thruster

    www.schottel.de

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 4

    Outlook

    Introduction

    History

    Function

    Basic principle

    Mathematical description (kinematic, speeds and forces)

    Multibody-system model of the VSP

    Simulation of operational conditions

    Conclusion

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 5

    Voith-Schneider propeller

    — Combination of propulsion and steering for good manoeuvrability and positioning

    — Consists of circularly arranged rudder blades rotating around vertical axis

    — Adjustment of pitch of blades over rotation by lever mechanism

    — Definition of direction of propulsion

    — With two propellers sideways movement is possible

    — Used in tugs, ferries, minesweepers and floating cranes since 1927

    Voith-Schneider propeller

    Tugboat with two propellers arranged one behind the other

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 6

    History

    — Voith-Schneider propeller: company J. M. Voith GmbH + inventor Ernst Schneider

    — Schneider made invention during his student days through theoretical considerations

    — No tests carried out at the beginning

    — End of 1925: Schneider applied for patent (Austria, France and Germany)

    — With a small test model Schneider was able to convince Voith of his drive system

    — First demonstration boat “Torqueo”, powered by a 60 HP gasoline engine was built in 1929

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 7

    Function

    — Vertically arranged rudder blades rotate around a common axis

    — Blades pitched periodically around their own axis

    — Rotation generates propulsion and allows to steer the ship at the same time

    — Change from forward to reverse travel without changing of direction of rotation

    — For steering it is not necessary that the rudder is flown with a sufficiently high velocity

    — Single wing moves through the water on a cycloidal path - cycloidal propeller

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 8

    Basic principle

    — Drive in neutral position, rotor blades tangentially positioned on circular path

    − No force applied by rotor blades, regardless of applied speed

    — Deflected at constant angle causes different inflow - pressure difference - force effect

    — When wings deflected unevenly, thrust force generation to the left

    − Vertical forces must neutralize each other

    — Conditions with so-called normal law fulfilled (normal of rudders must always meet at control point S at all times)

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 9

    Mathematical description

    — Kinematic description of joint position points by calculation of angles as function of leading point vector (∆L) and lengths of levers

    — Center of drive: simple four-joint gearbox (B0-B-A-A0) ൰∆𝐿 = (𝐿1 cos 𝛿

    𝐿1 sin 𝛿

    ൰𝐴 = (𝐿2 cos 𝜑

    𝐿2 sin 𝜑

    ൰𝐵 = (𝐿4 cos 𝜓 + 𝐿1 cos 𝛿

    𝐿4 sin 𝜓 + 𝐿1 sin 𝛿

    ൰𝑆(4) = (𝐿41 cos 𝜓 + 𝐿1 cos 𝛿

    𝐿41 sin 𝜓 + 𝐿1 sin 𝛿

    ൰𝐻 = (𝐿7 cos 𝜑 + 𝜀

    𝐿7 sin 𝜑 + 𝜀

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 10

    Mathematical description

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 11

    Mathematical description

    — Additionally the deflection angle of the blade in relation to tangent to circle required to describe acting forces

    — Angle between C, H and A0, υ can described by L6, L7 and position of C using A0-C

    — Angle β between tangent at point H and lever 6, difference between υ and 90°

    — Point C lies outside the circle if υ is greater than 90° and β is less than 0°

    — Inner position for opposite signs

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 12

    Approach to describe action forces

    — Approach to describe acting forces for multibody-system simulation model

    — Using overall model to make statements to loads acting on drivetrain

    — Assumption: driving speed equal to inflow velocity in direction of travel

    — Combination of different speed vectors

    — Position of control point S defines direction of travel

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 13

    Approach to describe action forces

    — Inflow velocity acts correspondingly against direction of travel

    — Described vectorially using control point position

    — Resulting velocity (relevant for blade profile) results from superposition of inflow velocity v and circumferential velocity u

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 14

    Approach to describe action forces

    — Orientation of speed u and v is dependent on position at circumference

    — Resulting speed q with maximum and minimum at 12 and 6 o’clock

    — Velocity q and coefficients for lift and drag force (dependent on angle of attack and Reynolds number) simplified describe load conditions

    — Resistance force is orientated in direction of resulting inflow velocity, lift force acts at right angles to it in the direction of the centre or to the outside

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 15

    MBS model of the VSP

    — Assembling of a CAD model based on the determined kinematic

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 16

    MBS model of the VSP

    — Determination of mass and mass moment of inertia of the components

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 17

    MBS model of the VSP

    — Assembling of a multibody system model

    − Consideration of electric motor, bevel gear stage and complete mechanism

    − Modelling of simplified force approach

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 18

    Simulation of operational conditions

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 19

    Simulation of operational conditions

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 20

    Simulation of operational conditions

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 21

    Simulation of operational conditions

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 22

    Analysis of mechanism geometry

    — Available model allows the analysis of the influence of the mechanism geometry on resulting thrust and drag forces

    pitch → worse extreme valuesthrust in driving direction→ reducessideward thrust → increasesefficiency → reducesdriving torque → reducesresisting torque → reduces

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 23

    Analysis of mechanism geometry

    — Sideward movement of the drive due to the sideward thrust forces

    — A second Voith-Schneider propeller which rotates in the opposite direction can be used to eliminate the sideward forces

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 24

    Analysis of mechanism geometry

    — Joints A and B have to support the highest loads

    — The joints H and A0 have to transfer torques

    — The acting forces lead to a bending of the wing

    maximum resulting forces

    resulting forces

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 25

    Conclusion

    — Kinematic description of mechanism is basis for constructive design

    — Simulating operational conditions using a multibody-system model

    — Simulation model will be used for further investigations

    − Interactions between constructive design and resulting thrust forces

    − Determination of occurring loads for drivetrain components

    − Complete parameterization of geometric variables allows analysis of different drive train configurations

  • Analysis of a Voith-Schneider-Propeller in SIMPACK3DEXPERIENCE Conference 2019 / Dr.-Ing. Thomas Rosenlöcher21 November 2019 / Darmstadt

    Page 26

    »Knowledge builds bridges.«

    Technische Universität DresdenFaculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering

    Institute of Machine Elements and Machine DesignChair of Machine Elements

    Münchner Platz 3D-01062 Dresden

    www.tu-dresden.de/me

    Thank you for your attention