Ob Booklet (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    1/13

     

    1

    Assignment Front Sheet

    Qualification Unit Number and Title

    Pearson BTEC Level 4 HND Diploma in Business Unit 3: Organisations and Behaviour

    Student Name Student No.

    Assessor name Nadine Gibson

    Date of Issue Completion date Submitted on

    18th April 2014 

    30TH May 2014

    Assignment title Organisation and Behaviour:

    Learning

    Outcome

    Learning

    outcome

    Assessment

    criteria

    In this assessment you will

    have the opportunity to

    present evidence that shows

    you are able to

    Task

    No.

    Evidence

    (Page no)

    LO1 Understandtherelationshipbetweenorganisationalstructure andculture

    1.1 Compare and contrastdifferent organisationalstructures and cultures

    1

    1.2 Explain how the relationshipbetween an organisation’sstructure and culture canimpact on the performance

    1

    1.3 Discuss the factors whichinfluence individual behaviour

    at work

    1

    LO2 Understanddifferentapproaches tomanagementandleadership.

    2.1 Compare the effectiveness ofdifferent leadership styles indifferent organisations

    2

    2.2 Explain how organisationaltheory underpins the practiceof management

    2

    2.3 Evaluate the differentapproaches to managementby different organisations

    2

    LO3 Understandways of usingmotivationaltheories in

    3.1 Discuss the impact thatdifferent leadership stylesmay have on motivation inorganisations in periods of

    3

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    2/13

     

    2

    organisations change3.2 Compare the application of

    different motivational theorieswithin the workplace

    3

    3.3 Evaluate the usefulness of amotivation theory formanagers

    3

    LO4 Understandmechanismsfor developingeffectiveteamwork inorganisations

    4.1 Explain the nature of groupsand group behaviour withinorganisations

    4

    4.2 Discuss factors that maypromote or inhibit thedevelopment of effectiveteamwork in organisations

    4

    4.3 Evaluate the impact oftechnology on teamfunctioning within a givenorganisation

    4

    Learner declaration

    I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sources are fully

    acknowledged.

    Student Signature: Date: 

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    3/13

     

    3

    In addition to the above PASS criteria, this assignment gives you the opportunity to submit evidence in order to achieve the followingMERIT and DISTINCTION grades.

    Grade Descriptor Indicative characteristic/s Contextualisation

    M1 Identify and apply strategies tofind appropriate solutions

    Effective judgements havebeen made

     An effective approach tostudy and research has beenapplied 

    To achieve M1, you will make effective judgments about the organisationalstructure and culture that is most suitable to Zappos.(Task 1)

    M2 Select/Design and applyappropriate methods/techniques

    Relevant theories andtechniques have beenapplied 

    To achieve M2, you will have used relevant management theories to underpinand justify your arguments, particularly in terms of establishing the linkbetween management/leadership style and motivation as well as exploring theapproaches to motivation used by Zappos ( Task 2 & 3) 

    M3 Present and communicateappropriate findings

    The appropriate structure andapproach have been used

     A range of sources ofinformation has been used 

    To achieve M3, your work will be presented in the appropriate formats andpresentation. Evidence of wider reading and research. (Task 1,2,3 &4) 

    D1 Use critical reflection to evaluateown work and justify valid conclusions

    Conclusions have beenarrived at through synthesisof ideas and have been

     justified 

    To achieve D1, you will have drawn conclusions which underscore the linksbetween motivation, leadership, organisational structure and employeeperformance.( Task 1 &3)

    D2 Take responsibility for managingand organising activities

     Autonomy/ independencehas been demonstrated

    To achieve D2, you will have displayed an effective approach to independentresearch. work is referenced appropriately using the Harvard system (Task

    1,2,3 and 4) 

    D3 Demonstrate convergent/lateraland creative thinking

    Effective thinking has takenplace in unfamiliar context

    To achieve D3, you will need to demonstrate critical thinking and analysis. Youshould be able to link theory to practice. ( Task 1,2,3 & 4) 

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    4/13

     

    4

    Assignment Brief

    Unit Number and title Unit 3: Organisations and Behaviour

    Qualification Pearson BTEC Level 4 HND Diploma in Business

    Start Date 18th April 2014

    Deadline 30th May 2014

    Assessor Nadine Gibson

    Assignment title

    Purpose of this assignment

    This assignment explores the impact of individual and group behaviour within

    organisations. It focuses on exploring the link between organisational structure and

    culture and their impact on individual and group behaviour. Structure and culture are

    influenced by the organisation’s size, the approach to leadership and management.

    The structure and culture of an organisation are key factors contributing to the

    motivation of the workforce at all level in the organisation. In addition, the assignment

    will explore the links between structure and culture and effective team working.

    De-layering, team-working, multi-skilling, integrated job descriptions and empowerment

    are all features of modern organisations. All of which is centred on the need for more

    flexible organisation and management in the face of continuous change.

    Organisations have devolved from traditional hierarchical structures with rigid cultures,

    to flatter structures with adaptive cultures and participative styles of management.

    While most organisation evolution is often continuous, incorporating modern

    management practice overtime, some organisations, such as Zappos, are taking a

    more radical approach to organisational re-structuring.

    Zappos, was founded in 1999 by Nick Swinmurn and has since become one of the

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    5/13

     

    5

    largest online shoe stores. In 2009, Zappos was purchased by Amazon.

    Zappos is known for its unconventional corporate culture. The company’s Q4 “All

    Hands” meeting in November 2013 was aptly-themed “Gone Wild”: one female

    employee voluntarily climbed into a case filled with tarantulas to win a $250 gift

    card. The event opened with a Lion King   performance put on by employees at the

    Smith Center in downtown Las Vegas and closed with an after party at the museum

    next door. Focusing on company culture and customer service is how CEO Tony Hsieh

    built Zappos into a billion-dollar online retailer. While he’s not getting rid of those

    priorities, Hsieh is laying the groundwork for a major reorganisation.

    Zappos’  recently announced that its traditional organisational structure is being

    replaced with Holacracy, a radical “self -governing” operating system where there are

    no job titles and no managers. The term Holacracy is derived from the Greek

    word holon, which means a whole that’s part of a greater whole. Instead of a top-down

    hierarchy, there’s a flatter “holarchy” that distributes power more evenly. The company

    will be made up of different circles—there will be around 400 circles at Zappos once

    the rollout is complete in December 2014—and employees can have any number of

    roles within those circles. This way, there’s no hiding under titles; radical transparency

    is the goal. 

    CEOs who sign on to Holacracy agree to relinquish some level of power. The

    advantage is that they get to view their company through an entirely different lens. But

    it’s an adjustment for both leaders and employees. Zappos, which has 1,500

    employees, will be the largest company to date to implement Holacracy.

    “We’re classically trained to think of ‘work’ in the traditional paradigm,” says John

    Bunch, who, along with Alexis Gonzales-Black, is leading the transition to Holacracy at

    Zappos. “One of the core principles is people taking personal accountability for their

    work. It’s not leaderless. There are certainly people who hold a bigger scope of

    purpose for the organisation than others. What it does do is distribute leadership into

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    6/13

     

    6

    each role. Everybody is expected to lead and be an entrepreneur in their own roles,

    and Holacracy empowers them to do so.” 

    In its highest-functioning form, he says, the system is “politics-free, quickly evolving to

    define and operate the purpose of the organization, responding to market and real-

    world conditions in real time. It’s creating a structure in which people have flexibility to

    pursue what they’re passionate about.” 

    Twitter Co-Founder Ev Williams is one of the system’s early adopters; he uses

    Holacracy to run his publishing platform Medium, which has around 50 employees.

    Jason Stirman, whose roles include head of people operations and product designer at

    Medium, says that one of the best things about Holacracy is that it facilitates

    autonomy. “Ev isn’t the CEO of Medium to have another title for his Twitter bio graphy.

    He wants the company to operate at the highest level possible, and he recognizes that

    all the power consolidated at top is great for people who are hungry but it can be a total

    bottleneck. There are decisions he wants to make and the rest can be absorbed in

    other areas of the organization.” 

    Still, Holacracy can feel unnatural, especially at first. Meetings are designed to rapidly

    process tensions. The focus is on the work, not the people. “It’s not a very human -

    centric model for things,” says Stirman. “For example, if you’re a junior designer,

    Holacracy says that you should bring up everything in this forum, but it can be difficult

    to ask for feedback or mentorship, especially when you’re new.” 

    Robertson says that Holacracy is meant to address structural issues, and that leaders

    will respond to the human element in different ways. Medium has created mentorship

    circles, and Zappos has similar plans. Williams and Hsieh both “have a high capacity to

    see the complex systems at play in their organizations,” says Robertson. “It’s not linear

    or a matter of just following the logical argument; it’s seeing the cloud of

    interconnections and influences, beyond just cause and effect thinking.” 

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    7/13

     

    7

     At the Zappos “All Hands” meeting Hsieh said that at most companies, “there’s  the

    organisation chart on paper, and then the one that is exactly how the company

    operates for real, and then there’s the organisation chart that it would like to have in

    order to operate more efficiently. … [With Holacracy] the idea is to process tensions so

    that the three organisational charts are pretty close together.” 

    Hsieh’s plans for Zappos are part of an even more ambitious undertaking. He’s

    currently investing $350 million of his own fortune to transform downtown Las Vegas,

    where Zappos’ is now headquartered, into an improved holarchical system. For Hsieh,

    work, play and everything else are already a series of overlapping circles. (Source:

    www.qz.com) 

    Task 1 (LO1: 1.1,1.2,1.3 and

    (a) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages to Zappos (i) if they maintain a

    traditional hierarchical structure, and (ii) if they adopt a flatter structure.

    (b) Explain how the new organisational structure and culture may impact on bothemployee and organisational performance.

    Task 2 (LO2: 2.1,2.2,2.3 and

    Compare and contrast the leadership and management styles of Zappos with its

    parent company Amazon. Use appropriate management and leadership theories to

    underpin and justify your answer.

    Task 3 (LO3: 3.1,3.2,3.3 and

    (a) Examine how Zappos leadership style may affect the motivation of their

    employees during the organisational re-structuring.

    (b) Clearly defined job titles, responsibilities and authority have traditionally

    been used as a means of motiving employees. Under the new organisation

    structure there are no job titles or managers. Critically discuss the alternative

    http://www.qz.com/http://www.qz.com/http://www.qz.com/

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    8/13

     

    8

    approaches Zappos can use to motivate their staff.

    (c) Evaluate the benefits of motivation to both Zappos and its employees.

    Task 4 (LO4: 4.1,4.2,4.3 and

    Zappos’s flatter organisational structure will be made of ‘circles’ or groups.

    (a) Explain the behaviours and dynamics of groups, including the factors that may

    inhibit effective group formation and teamwork.

    (b) Discuss the strategies that Zappos can use to develop and promote effective

    teamwork. Examine the impact of technology on teamwork.

    Evidence

    Checklist

    Summary of evidence Evidence presented

    Task 1 Essay (word count 750 max ) Task 2 Essay (word count 900 max)Task 3 Essay (word count 1100 max)Task 4 Essay (word count 750 max)  AdditionalInformation

    References ( Harvard referencing system)

    Important 

      Plagiarism, collusion and non-compliance with assessment regulations are offences underthe awarding body regulations and where suspected will be thoroughly investigated underoff icial procedures.

      Penalties may be imposed depending on the severity of the offence, as per the awardingbody guidance.

      Appropriate citations of source documents are essential when presentingwritten/word processed work and it is crucial that you quote the books, journals,websites etc. that you used whilst you carried out desk research.

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    9/13

     

    9

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    10/13

     

    10

    Achievement Summary

    Qualification Pearson BTEC Level 4 HNDBusiness

    AssessorName

    Nadine Gibson

    Unit Numberand title

    Unit 3: Organisations and Behaviour

    Student Name Student No.

    CriteriaReference

    To achieve the criteria the evidence must show that thestudent is able to:

    Achieved?(tick)

    LO1

    1.1 Compare and contrast different organisational structures and

    culture1.2 Explain how the relationship between an organisation’sstructure and culture can impact on the performance if thebusiness

    1.3 Discuss the factors which influence individual behaviour atwork

    LO2

    2.1 Compare the effectiveness of different leadership styles indifferent organisations

    2.2 Explain how organisational theory underpins the practice ofmanagement

    2.3 Evaluate the different approaches to management used bydifferent organisations

    LO3

    3.1 Discuss the impact that different leadership styles may haveon motivation in organisations in periods of change.

    3.2 Compare the application of different motivational theorieswithin the workplace.

    3.3 Evaluate the usefulness of a motivation theory for mangers

    LO4

    4.1 Explain the nature of groups and group behaviour withinorganisations4.2 Discuss the factors that my promote or inhibit the

    development of effective teamwork in organisations4.3 Evaluate the impact of technology on team functioning within

    a given organisation

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    11/13

     

    11

    Grade Descriptor Achieved?(tick)

    Grade descriptor Achieved?(tick)

    M1 Indentify and applystrategies to find appropriatesolutions

    D1 Use critical reflection toevaluate own work and justifyvalid conclusions 

    M2 Select/Design and applyappropriatemethods/techniques

    D2 Take responsibility formanaging and organisingactivities 

    M3 Present andcommunicate appropriatefindings

    D3 Demonstrateconvergent/lateral andcreative thinking 

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    12/13

     

    12

    Assignment Feedback

    Formative Feedback: Assessor to Student

    Action Plan

    Summative feedback

  • 8/9/2019 Ob Booklet (1)

    13/13

     

    13

    Feedback: Student to Assessor

    Assessor

    Signature

    Date

    Student

    Signature

    Date