Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    1/26

    DIESEL - RK

    RK-model of mixture formation and combustion in a dieseltakes intoaccount:

    - piston bowl shape;

    - swirl intensity;- injection profile, including multistage microprocessor controlled injection;

    - number, diameter and directions of sprayer nozzles;

    - interaction of sprays with walls;

    - interaction of wall surface flows formed by sprays among themselves.

    Built-in procedure of multiparameter optimizing.The library of searchingprocedures contains 14 methods of the nonlinear programming.

    Model of EGR system.

    Software for thermodynamic simulation and

    optimizing of ICEAdvanced abilities:

    "Fuel Spray Visualization" code.This code makes it possible in a pictorialform to analyze an animation picture of interaction of fuel sprays with combustion

    chamber walls, with swirl and among themselves.

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    2/26

    Simulation of the fuel sprays in the swirling air flow

    Penetration of spray tip (2) and

    boundaries of WSF* (3-6) as the

    functions of time

    Interaction of spray with a wall Schematic Fuel spray structure

    Character zones

    1. Rare environment of free spray

    2. Dense axial core of free jet

    3. Dense forward front

    4. Rare environment of WSF

    5. Dense core of WSF6. Dense forward front of WSF

    7. Axial conical core of WSF

    1. Velocity

    2. Penetration

    3. Right and left outer

    boundaries of WSF

    4. Forward outer

    boundary of WSF5. Back outer

    boundary of WSF

    6. Free spray

    * WSF is the so-called Wall Surface Flow of air

    with high density of fuel drops

    # Frame

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    3/26

    Simulation of the fuel sprays in the swirling air flow

    Piston bowl is a figure of revolutions.

    Direction of each fuel jet is

    specified in the two planes.

    Swirl intensity is specified as a

    swirl number.

    The trajectories and deformations of free

    sprays as well movement and deformation

    of wall surface flows formed by sprays are

    simulated in view of influence of

    tangential air swirl and angle between

    spray and wall.

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    4/26

    Simulation of fuel sprays in the swirling air flow

    Results of simulation of jets and

    WSF development

    Sketches of shadowgraphmovieof WSF development

    Allocation of fuel in the zones for each spray is presented in graph

    Spray # 3Spray # 1

    Heat release rate

    dx/d

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    5/26

    74,69

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Fractionoffuelinthezone,

    %

    Environment 17,03 19,61 20,95 17,09 74,69

    Free Jet Core 0,08 0,38 0,61 0,09 1,17

    WSF 7,84 5,01 3,43 7,57 23,85

    Cylinder Head 0,05 0 0 0,24 0,29

    Spray #1 Spray # 2 Spray # 3 Spray # 4 Sum

    Analysis of allocation of fuel in the character zones

    Tractor diesel

    S/D = 140 / 120

    RPM = 1800;BMEP = 7.7 bar

    *WSF - wallsurface flow

    formed by jets

    on piston surface

    Click picture to zoom

    and start visualization

    http://iviewhider.exe%20cm1800_1.gif%20/delay=030http://iviewhider.exe%20cm1800_1.gif%20/delay=030http://gifview.exe%20cm1800_1.gif%20/delay=040
  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    6/26

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    7/26

    Swirl occurred deformation of Wall Surface Flow

    Simulation Measurement

    ge,

    g/kW h

    Single cylinder

    diesel

    S/D = 140 / 130

    RPM = 2100;

    BMEP = 7.0 bar

    *WSF - wall surface flowformed by jets on piston surface

    - Swirl number

    Search of optimum value of swirl intensity

    Fraction of fuel in the

    zones of WSF crossing

    Fraction of fuel in

    the Environment

    ge

    Verification of the calculated data compared to experimental ones

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    8/26

    Simulation of diesel combustion

    over the whole speed range

    Comparison between calculated and experimental data

    Truck diesel S/D = 120 / 120

    SimulationMeasurement Click picture to zoom

    http://gifview.exe%20kamaz%202200.gif%20/delay=007http://gifview.exe%20kamaz%201400.gif%20/delay=007http://gifview.exe%20kamaz%201000.gif%20/delay=007
  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    9/26

    Simulation of soot emission in the diesel

    over the whole speed range

    Comparison between calculated

    and experimental data

    SimulationMeasurement

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    10/26

    NOx emission simulation

    The oxides of nitrogen are formed in a zone of combustion by the

    chain mechanism. The main reactions are described by the Zeldovichscheme:

    O2 2O;

    N2 + O NO + N;

    N + O2 NO + O.

    Temperature in a zone of combustion is defined by zone model.

    The calculation of nitrogen oxides formation is carried out on the

    kinetic equation.

    On each step the equilibrium composition of 18 components isdefined in a zone of combustion.

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    11/26

    11 components:O, O2 , H, H2 , OH, H2O,

    CO2 , N, N2 , NO, NO2

    Model of nitrogen oxides formation with

    calculation of equilibrium of 18 components

    18 components:O, O2 , O3, H, H2 , OH, H2O,

    C, CO, CO2 , CH4, N, N2 ,

    NO, NO2, NH3, HNO3, HCN

    Equilibrium equations:

    ;;;21

    HH3

    23

    OO2

    21

    OO1 2232ppKppKppK ===

    Material balance equations:

    HCNOOC ;; SSSSSS ppp ===

    The Dalton equation :

    HCNHNONHNONONNCH

    COCOHOHHHOOO

    33224

    22232

    pppppppp

    pppppppppp

    ++++++++

    +++++++++=

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    12/26

    Model of nitrogen oxides formation with

    calculation of equilibrium of 18 componentsComparison of calculated and experimental data

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

    Regime number

    NOx measurement

    NOx simulation

    NOx formation in exhaust gas of truck diesel YaMZ-7512

    at operation on 13 regimes cycle.

    NOxfraction,

    pp

    m

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    13/26

    NOx emission calculation

    at different values of Compression Ratio

    Diesel S/D = 120 / 105

    Full load:

    Ne = 22 kW, RPM = 2000

    NOx,

    g/3

    ge,

    g/kWh

    CR = 16.2

    CR = 18.8

    Simulation Measurement

    Click picture to

    zoom and start

    visualization

    CR

    Comparison between calculated

    and experimental data

    ll i f hi h f C i l i

    http://gifview.exe%20d120_1.gif%20/delay=040
  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    14/26

    Illustration of high accuracy of ICE simulation

    over the whole operating range

    Truck diesel: S/D=140/130

    Click picture to zoom and start visualization

    http://gifview.exe%201400_3_1.gif%20/delay=020http://gifview.exe%201400_3_1.gif%20/delay=020http://gifview.exe%202100_3_1.gif%20/delay=025http://gifview.exe%202100_2_1.gif%20%20/delay=030http://gifview.exe%20%202100_1.gif%20/delay=040http://gifview.exe%201400_1.gif%20/delay=040http://gifview.exe%201400_2_1.gif%20/delay=030
  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    15/26

    over the whole operating range

    Truck diesel: S/D=140/130

    Comparison between calculated and experimental data

    is the relative error

    Measur. Calcul. ,

    Ne 24.4 25.1 2.9

    SFC 577 560 2.9

    NOx 240 260 8.3

    Measur. Calcul. ,%

    Ne 122.2 122. 0

    SFC 258 258 0

    NOx 980 930 5.1

    Measur. Calcul. ,%

    Ne 244.3 252 3.1

    SFC 240 232 3.3

    NOx 1920 1869 2.6

    Measur. Calcul ,%

    Ne 180.3 178. 1.2

    SFC 219 222 1.4

    NOx 2160 1990 7.9

    Measur. Calcul ,%

    Ne 90.2 86 4.6

    SFC 223 235 5.4NOx 1430 1023 28

    Measur. Calcul. ,%

    Ne 18 16.2 10

    SFC 411 456 11

    NOx 280 320 14

    Ill t ti f hi h f ICE i l ti

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    16/26

    Illustration of high accuracy of ICE simulation

    over the whole operating range

    Experiment Simulation

    Characteristic of locomotive diesel S/D=260/260

    Click picture to zoom and start visualization

    http://gifview.exe%20536_1.gif%20/delay=030http://gifview.exe%20845_1.gif%20/delay=030http://gifview.exe%201001_1.gif%20/delay=040
  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    17/26

    Illustration of high accuracy of ICE simulation

    over the whole operating range

    Experiment Simulation

    Ne ge Air Flow Tt Smoke NO

    % 2.5 1.9 1.9 3.3 0 0.6

    Ne ge Air Flow Tt Smoke NOx% 0.7 0 6.2 0.9 14.2 2

    Comparison between calculated and experimental data

    is the relative error.

    Air Flow is the Air flow rate; ge is the specific fuel consumpti

    Tt is Turbine inlet temperature;Ne is engine power;

    Characteristic of locomotive diesel S/D=260/260

    Ne ge Air Flow Tt Smoke NOx

    % 3.6 3.5 1 1.2 7.1 0.7

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    18/26

    Simulation of combustion in diesel with

    multistage injection of fuel

    Locomotive diesel S/D=260/260,

    Full load.

    Piston bowl: Shallow Hesselman

    Click picture to start visualization

    http://gifview.exe%20double_inj.gif%20/delay=048
  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    19/26

    Two engine parameters are changed in

    X, Y directions from MIN up to MAX

    with fixed steps.

    DIESEL-4t carries out the ICE

    simulation in the bundles of the grid.

    2D optimization tasks

    Use the scanning if the problem of optimization of any process can be formulated as

    bivariate (number of arguments is 2)

    The results of scanning may be displayed as 3-D diagram

    ... or as isolines families

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    20/26

    Optimizing mixture formation to decrease

    NOx emission in the tractor dieselBase configuration Optimum solution

    Diesel S / D = 120 / 105Ne = 22 kW, RPM = 2000

    Parameter Base Optimum

    Compression Ratio 16 19.5

    Fuel-Injection timing, deg BTC 16 11.5

    Fuel nozzle design 3 x 0.3; = 56o / 66o 3 x 0.22; = 75o

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Max Pressure of Injection, bar 520 665

    Specific fuel consumption, g/kW h 239 236

    Smoke level, Hartridge number 17.2 17.9

    NOx emission, g/m3 3.4 1.92 = 40%

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Uo - Injection ratedx/dFi - Heat release rate.

    M l i i i i i f h hi h

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    21/26

    Multiparametric optimization of the high-

    speed dieselto decrease its emission levelGoal of optimizing: decrease of particulate matter emission () and

    nitrogen oxides emission(NOx).

    MIN

    CR - Compression ratio;

    i, di - Number and Diameter of injector nozzles;

    , - Injection duration and Injection Timing, deg B TDC;

    InjProf - Injection profile;

    PistBowl - Piston bowl shape;

    NuzzlDir - Injector nozzles design.

    )(XfNOx

    NOxC

    PM

    PMCF

    o

    NOx

    o

    PM =+=

    Arguments:

    =Y

    Limits:Pz - Maximum cylinder pressure (Pz < 150 bar);

    Pinj - Maximum injection pressure (Pinj < 1500 bar);ge - Specific fuel consumption (ge < 260 g/kW h).

    =X

    The complex arguments: Injection profile, Piston bowl shape, Injector nozzles design are

    assigned by user by experience and analysis of allocation of fuel in the zones (by using FJV

    software). For searching the optimum combination of scalar arguments the well known

    algorithms of nonlinear programming are used.

    M lti t i ti i ti f th hi h

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    22/26

    Multiparametric optimization of the high-

    speed dieselto decrease its emission level

    Alternate designsof the piston bowl ( PistBowl )

    Variants of the injection profiles ( InjProf )

    Alternate designsof the injector nozzles ( NuzzlDir )

    Base:

    #

    Alternates:

    Base Alternate # 1 (narrowed) Alternate #2

    i = 5, angle between jet axes: 146 ; i = 5, angle between jet axes : 134 ;

    i = 6, angle between jet axes : 146 ; i = 6, angle between jet axes : 134 .For each combination of complex arguments: the searching rational combination of the varied

    factors [F = f(, dc, , ) => MIN ] is entrusted to a formal procedure of non-linearro rammin .

    Complex arguments

    M lti t i ti i ti f th hi h

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    23/26

    Multiparametric optimization of the high-

    speed dieselto decrease its emission level

    *N - Number of ICE simulation sessions at optimization

    1,31 1,371,454 1,4

    1,33 1,32 1,31

    2,52

    0

    0,5

    1

    1,5

    2

    2,5

    3

    F

    Results of optimizing obtained by different methods for one of combination of the

    complex arguments

    o

    NOx

    o

    PMNOx

    NOxC

    PM

    PMCF +=

    NuzzlDir:5 di 146

    PistBowl: Base

    N=46 N=114 N=67 N=58 N=102 N=118 N=115

    Method:

    Rosenbrok

    Method:

    Pearson

    Gradient

    method

    Method:

    Flatcher-

    Reeves

    Method:

    Newton-

    Rafson

    Method:

    Broiden

    Method:

    Davidone-

    Flatcher-

    Powell

    Base

    configuration

    InjProf: 1

    Combination of the complex arguments

    Optimum

    solutionScalar

    arguments:CR = 20;

    di = 0.195; = 24.4;

    = 9.4.

    Limits:Pz =139 bar;

    Pinj = 1441 bar;

    ge = 251 g/kWh

    NOx=6.11

    PM=0.495

    NOx=7.43

    PM=0.074

    NOx=7.25

    PM=0.101

    NOx=8.66PM=0.067

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    24/26

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    25/26

    Multiparametric optimization of the high-

    speed diesel to decrease its emission level

    *N - Number of ICE simulation sessions at optimization

    1,25 1,26 1,27 1,27 1,251,3 1,3

    2,52

    0

    0,5

    1

    1,5

    2

    2,5

    3

    F

    Results of optimizing obtained by different methods foranothercombination of the

    complex arguments: InjProf, PisBowl, NuzzlDir

    o

    NOx

    o

    PMNOx

    NOxC

    PM

    PMCF +=

    NuzzlDir:6 di 134

    PistBowl: 1

    N=76 N=124 N=57 N=88 N=112 N=128 N=85

    Method:

    Rosenbrok

    Method:

    Powell

    Gradient

    method

    Method:

    Nelder-Mead

    Method:

    Newton-

    Rafson

    O

    n-coordinates

    method

    Method:

    Davidone-

    Flatcher-

    Powell

    Base

    configuration

    InjProf: 5

    Combination of the complex arguments

    Optimum

    solution

    Scalar

    arguments:

    CR = 21.7;di = 0.225;

    = 17.6;

    = 8.2.

    Limits:Pz =150 bar;

    Pinj = 1501 bar;

    ge = 247 g/kWh

    NOx=6.11

    PM=0.495

    NOx=6.9

    PM=0.079

    NOx=6.6

    PM=0.093

    NOx=6.6PM=0.0934

  • 8/14/2019 Diesel - Rk 2003 Audio

    26/26

    Multiparametric optimization of the high-

    speed diesel to decrease its emission level

    Comparison between obtained optimum solutions and base ICE

    configuration at full load.

    Base configuration

    F = 2.52

    Optimum solution # 1:

    F = 1.31

    Optimum solution # 2:

    F = 1.25

    NuzzlDir:

    6 0.225 134

    PistBowl: # 1

    InjProf: 5

    Complex

    arguments:

    NuzzlDir:

    5 0.195 146

    PistBowl: Base

    InjProf: 1

    Complex

    arguments: