IGJ/ERDFRegionaldevelopmentprogrammeIGJ/ERDF Regional ...€¦ · A ti2014Austria2014Austria...

/ l d lIGJ/ERDF Regional development programmeIGJ/ERDF Regional development programmeIGJ/ERDF Regional development programme/ g p p gA t i 2014 2020 O i l tiAustria 2014‐2020: Ongoing evaluationAustria 2014‐2020: Ongoing evaluationAustria 2014 2020: Ongoing evaluation

Monitoring CommitteeMonitoring Committee

O i l ti P j t t tOngoing evaluation ∙ Project management team 

W k P k 5 W k P k 7W k P k 3W k P k 2W k P k 1 W k P k 4 W k P k 8 W k P k 9W k P k 6 W k P kWork Package 5 Work Package 7Work Package 3Work Package 2Work Package 1 Work Package 4 Work Package 8 Work Package 9Work Package 6 Work Package Governance CommunicationCO2SMER&D&I Sustainable  Art. 114 Reg.  Continuous Horizontal  102

territorialg

(EU) 1303/2013 ReportingPrinciples Processterritorialand urban

(EU) 1303/2013 ReportingPrinciples Processand urban 

development

ThematicThematicThematic Technical Evaluation of ContinuousThematic Evaluation SoundingFinal evaluationThematic Obj i 4

Thematic Obj i 2

Thematic Obj i 1

Technical A i

Evaluation of i i

Continuous Thematic Obj i

Evaluation ll

Sounding B d

Final evaluation Objective 4Objective 2Objective 1 Assistance communication  progress reportsObjectives  across all  Boardsreport

strategy1, 4, 6, 8, 9 priority axes Ad‐hoc Supportgy, , , , p y pp

S d d i f h l i I l f k h ldScope and design of the evaluation Involvement of stakeholdersp g

Duration: 2019‐2023 Stakeholders are incorporated into the evaluation via soundingDuration: 2019 2023C ib i l i hi f k

Stakeholders are incorporated into the evaluation via sounding b d Contribution analysis as overarching framework:  boardsy g

empirical revisiting of the factors underpinning the logical Composed of programme stakeholders experts and partners empirical revisiting of the factors underpinning the logical  Composed of programme stakeholders, experts, and partnerschains of policy action Provide feedback to interim results presented and discussedchains of policy action

l ti f h i it i i di id ll ith t il dProvide feedback to interim results presented and discussedM t th ti k k evaluation of each priority axis individually with tailored  Meet on three times per work package

qualitative and quantitative approachesqualitative and quantitative approaches generating short‐ and long‐term policy recommendationsg g g p y

The Contribution Analysis as a methodological framework Sounding boards to validate evaluation approaches and findingsThe Contribution Analysis as a methodological framework Sounding boards to validate evaluation approaches and findings

Desk review of specific objectives (SO) and ts

Addressed challenges1Desk review of specific objectives (SO) and 

di j tInception Report ∙ Interim Report ∙ Final Reportpug

corresponding projectsp p p p

Inp

s

Theory of Change (ToC)2 Development of ToC on level of SO esTheory of Change (ToC)2 Development of ToC on level of SO

oc

ProgrammePro

Programme StakeholderC t t Prd

Assessment of the assumptions of the ToC:StakeholderContent  Process 

oar

Evidence assessment 3Assessment of the assumptions of the ToC: D t ll ti PartnersModeration ModerationB

o

Data collection Partners

E

Moderation Moderation

ng 

Expertsdin

E i i l f T C i und

Overall assessment4Empirical assessment of ToC: varying 

Sou

Overall assessment4qualitative/quantitative approach per SO

S

qualitative/quantitative approach per SO

F db k th d l D t d

ts

Potential re‐adjustment of ToC; answering Feedback on methodology ∙ Data access and sourcespu

Synthesis5Potential re adjustment of ToC; answering f l ti bj ti Validation of findings ∙ Validation of recommendationsu

tpyof evaluation objectives Validation of findings   Validation of recommendations

O

f l f h lf h l ( ) Use of results of the evaluationState of the evaluation (May 2019) Use of results of the evaluationState of the evaluation (May 2019)

W k k St t P Short‐term: Results of the evaluation aid with the implemen‐

Work package Status Progress Short‐term: Results of the evaluation aid with the implemen‐

WP 1: R&D&I Plannedtation of the programme. In particular, the evaluation seeks to

WP   1: R&D&I Planned

WP 2 SME Interim report tation of the programme. In particular, the evaluation seeks to 

id i t hi h l t it i d t iWP   2: SME Interim report

provide inputs which complement monitoring and steering WP   3: CO2 Evaluation

processesWP   4: Sustainable territorial and urban development  Inception report

processes.WP   5: TA/Governance Final report

Long‐term: An important output of the evaluation are recommen‐/ p

WP 6: Horizontal Principles Evaluation Long term: An important output of the evaluation are recommen

d i f h dj f d h i i i li h

WP   6: Horizontal Principles Evaluation

WP 7 Communication Interim report dations for the adjustment of measures and their impacts in light WP   7: Communication Interim report j p g

of the programming of IJG/ERDF 2021 2027WP   8: Art. 114 Report Planned

of the programming of IJG/ERDF 2021‐2027. WP   9: Continuous Reporting Reports 2019

WP 10: Process Ongoing cooperationg g p

May 2019May 2019

Committed by: Managing authority at the Austrian Conference on Spatial Planning (ÖROK) ∙ oerok@oerok.gv.at ∙ +43 1 535 34 44y g g y p g g

Authors: ÖIR GmbH ∙ convelop – cooperative knowledge design gmbh ∙ KMU Forschung Austria ∙ ÖAR GmbH ∙Authors: ÖIR GmbH   convelop cooperative knowledge design gmbh  KMU Forschung Austria   ÖAR GmbH   ÖGUT GmbH Spatial Foresight GmbHÖGUT GmbH ∙ Spatial Foresight GmbH

Programme: IGJ/ERDF (Austria) 2014‐2020 ∙ www.efre.gv.at

Type: Ongoing evaluationType: Ongoing evaluation