26
Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer Luxembourg, 10.11.2015 1 Des bâtiments en construction mixte acier-béton: Une alternative pour les entreprises générales de construction?! Nachhaltige Gebäudelösungen in Stahl- und Verbundbauweise - eine Alternative für Generalunternehmer und Bauunternehmen?! Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer steelconstruction.lu

Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

  • Upload
    ngolien

  • View
    234

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

Luxembourg, 10.11.2015

1

Des bâtiments en construction mixte acier-béton: Une alternative pour les entreprises générales de

construction?!

Nachhaltige Gebäudelösungen in Stahl- und Verbundbauweise - eine Alternative für

Generalunternehmer und Bauunternehmen?!

Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

steelconstruction.lu

Page 2: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

Application of steel and composite structures

Multi-Storey Buildings

Hall Construction

Industrial Buildings

Pylons, Towers

Chimney

Scaffolds and Formwork

Cranes and conveying plants

Bridges

Bunker, Tanks

High Rising Buildings

2

Parking's

Page 3: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

Architectural Steel Structures

3

Stadtbibliothek im hessischen Bad Vilbel, Brücke über die Nidda Architekt: demmel und hadler GmbH, München

Hubschrauberlandeplattform Universitätsklinikum Aachen Architekt: OX2architekten

Advantages … for architecture

Ø  variety conceptions and forms Ø  innovative building structures Ø  elegant, transparent, lightweight and

filigree structures Ø  small cross-sections Ø  optimal use in existing buildings Ø  good combinations with other materials

such as concrete, glass and membranes, wood

Ø  many options for installations

Page 4: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

functional multi-storey office buildings

4

Are Steel and Composite solutions

also still interesting for functional

(“ordinary”) multi-storey office

buildings?

What does this mean for the

general contractor or contractor

and at least for the investor?

Page 5: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

standard-solutions in steel and composite

5

steel & composite columns

composite girders

composite slabs

slim-floor beams

Page 6: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

steel and composite structures what does it mean for organization of building site

6

Advantages … for production

Ø  industrial production in workshop Ø  higher quality standards

⇒ industrial standards Ø  production on basis of electronically

controlled systems (CNC) Ø  better dimensional accuracy Ø  better conditions for welding process Ø  better operational safety Ø  independent of weather Ø  better waste management

outsource of production processes

building site workshop

delivering “just in time”

Page 7: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

steel and composite structures what does it mean for organization of building site

7

Ø  efficient time and cost management with just-in-time processes

Ø  industrialized construction process for construction on site by using of “prefabricated” steel components

Ø  less noise/waste on building site Ø  short construction period Ø  small site equipment (!) Ø  better coordination of logistics

Advantages … for construction site

Example metal decking sheets: - 850-1500m2 of sheet by one lorry - placing by hand - low crane utilization - function as formwork and reinforcement

Page 8: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

Required preparation and planning phases for steel composite structures

8

key-dates→ to fixe in the contract

engineering - global design of structure general plans approval engineering - steel design of steel structure design of joints shop drawings erection drawings approval Work preparation purchasing of materials preparation of NC-datas Shop fabrication pre-processing rolling date!!! (saw, descale) prefabrication assembly process coating transport Erection on build site

Page 9: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

Advantages of early design state

9

design execution

cons

truct

ion

budg

et

time

Ø  Agreement with architect and building installation engineers

Ø  Solve of conflicts and problems for divers interfaces in an early state

Ø  Planning reliability Ø  Time for optimization and preparation Ø  Including of 3-D drawings and BIM

models ⇒ Reduction of construction costs!

Advantages … of early design state

budg

et c

onsu

mpt

ion

Page 10: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

L Often two different contractors for concrete and steel work L Coordination of an additional subcontractors K Interface concrete work and steel work K Coordination of logistics with several subcontractors K Reliability of construction schedules L Availability of construction crane! L Connection steel to concrete L Connection often to labor intensive

Constraints in multi-storey buildings situation on construction site

10

Problems on building site for mixed structures

Economic multi-storeys = mixed systems of concrete + steel composite elements foundation stiffening walls slabs (semi-precast or composite) columns (concrete or composite)

girders slabs (composite slabs) columns (steel or composite)

reinforced concrete

steel / composite

Page 11: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

optimization and simplification of steel-composite structures for multi-story buildings

11

Hypothese:

STEEL COMPOSITE STRUCTURE = PRE-FABRICATED STRUCTURE

Solution: Ø  simplification of interface between steel and concrete Ø  simplified connections between steel and concrete

elements - plug-in connection (LEGO) - support consoles - easy compensation of tolerances

Ø  simple placing of beams by construction crane without much bolting or any welding! J

Page 12: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

example of a standard office building

12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A = 328 m2 A = 328 m2

A = 437,4m2

A = 1093,4m2

A = 250m2

3 Levels: A = 4030,2m2

Surface:

- 32,4m -

- 48,6m -

- 13,

5m

-

- 13,

5m

-

Page 13: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

example of a standard office building

13

Page 14: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

solution with pre-stressed hollow core slab – without internal columns axe raster 13,50m/4,05m

14

7,75

5,

75

8,10 8,10 8,10 8,10

edge girder edge girder

edge girder h=600mm

suspended ceiling

edge

gird

er h

= 6

00m

m

750

390

210

90

60

300

A

B

C

2 3 4 5 6

Page 15: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

solution with composite cellular beams – without internal columns axe raster 13,50m/4,05m

15

steelconstruction.info

7,75

5,

75

8,10 8,10 8,10 8,10

IPE 330 IPE 330

A

B

C

2 3 4 5 6

IPE 330

IPE

450

– S

460

IPE

450

– S

460

5,40 5,40 2,7 2,7 IPE 330 IPE 330 geometry: L = htot = hc = serviceability limit state fo = fo,q = w = fire: θcrit. = steel ratio:

13.500mm 640mm 130mm 4,0 Hz 3,8 Hz (0,2q) < L/500 617 C° 30,6 kg/m2

arcelormittal

h c = 1

3cm

Page 16: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

solution with solid concrete slab axe raster 8,10m/7,75m/5,75m

16

7,75

5,

75

2 3 4 5 6

A

B

C

8,10 8,10 8,10 8,10

271

60

13

63

solid concrete slab

27

30

350

230

13

Page 17: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

solution with slim-floor beams and Cofraplus 220 slab

17

7,75

5,

75

8,10 8,10 8,10 8,10

Pos

A1

Pos

A2

geometry: L = htot = hc = serviceability limit state fo = fo,q = w = fire: R60 steel ratio: 18,2 kg/m2

7.750/5.750mm 640mm 32mm 4,7/7,3 Hz 4,5/7,0 Hz (0,2q) < L/500

8,10

2 3 4 5 6

5,40 5,40

Cofraplus 220

Comflor 210

640

320

260

60

HEB180-S355 HEA180-S355

edge girder HEA

arcelormittal

dutchengineering

Page 18: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

solution with primary and secondary composite cellular beam axe raster 8,10m/7,75m/5,75m

18

7,75

5,

75

2 3 4 5 6

B

C

Pos

C1

A

8,10 8,10 8,10 8,10

Pos

C1

Pos C2

geometry: L = htot = hc = serviceability limit state fo = fo,q = w = fire: θcrit. = steel ratio: 23,5 kg/m2

7,75/5,75/8,1m 560mm 150mm 5,4/4,9Hz 5,0/4,6Hz (0,2q) < L/500 592/583C°

edge girder HEA160-S235

Page 19: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

Fire protection of steel sections? fire design by natural fire

19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A = 328 m2 A = 328 m2

A = 437,4m2

- 32,4m -

- 48,6m - - 1

3,5m

-

- 13,

5m

-

Fire Installations: Ø  Automatic Water Extinguishing

system Ø  Independent Water Supplies Ø  Automatic Fire Detection by

Heat and Smoke Ø  Safe Access Routes Ø  Fire Fighting Devices Ø  Smoke Exhaust System

θgaz= 642C° 40 Min. Pos C1: IPE 330 45 Min.

θsteel=549C°< θcrit =592C°

Page 20: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

comparison of structure weight superstructure

20

hc=27cm 100%

627 kg/m2

58% 366 kg/m2

41% 259 kg/m2

55% 344 kg/m2

47% 293 kg/m2

hc=25cm* 93 %

584kg/m2

Wei

ght o

f sla

bs b

ased

on

slab

sur

face

[kg/

m2 ]

Page 21: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

comparison of building site logistics site traffic for structural work – superstructure/slabs

21

80% n=103

51% n=67

100% n=130

94%* n=122*

59% n=77

58% n=76

Site

traf

fic fo

r sla

bs -

supe

rstr

uctu

re

Page 22: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

comparison of construction budget for slab systems of superstructure

22

98,33 €/m2 98,79€/m2 95,85€/m2 102,17 €/m2 101,69€/m2

102,6% 103,1% 100% 106,6% 106,1%

Bud

get b

ased

on

slab

sur

face

[€/m

2 ]

Page 23: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

influence of structure on facade

23

htot= 0,75m htot= 0,64m htot= 0,64m htot= 0,63m htot= 0,56m Slab height:

Bud

get b

ased

on

slab

sur

face

[€/m

2 ]

Page 24: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

comparison of construction budget for slab systems considering the influence of structure on facade

24

balance by façade budget of 348€/m2

Bud

get b

ased

on

slab

sur

face

[€/m

2 ]

Page 25: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer

advantages by the steel/composite construction method for the building owner and construction company

25

high degree of industrial prefabrication

small site installation reduce of site-traffic

high flexibility of use by large spans and small

component dimensions

integrated fire protection

high dimensional accuracy, unrestricted interior fittings

and installation works

high load capacity of the composite components

sustainable structures with possibilities of recycling +

re-use with financial returns

short construction times, reducing the cost of capital

reduction of construction self-weight

weather independence saving of natural recourses

reinforcement measures are simple to realize in

case of later use changes

Page 26: Univ.-Doz. Dr.- Ing. M. Schäfer

Univ.-Doz. Dr.-Ing. Markus Schäfer 26

Journée Construction Acier 2015 mardi le 10 novembre, Luxembourg

merci de votre attention!!!